IRS revokes a prior revocation of an annuity ruling

Number
202630002
Outcome
Revocation
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
Code sections
§ 72, § 6110
Ruling dated
April 28, 2026
Publicly released
July 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2026, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS had previously ruled that choosing a new variable-payment, term-certain annuity option would not cause income inclusion before amounts were actually paid. In 2024, it prospectively revoked that part of the earlier ruling for contracts with applications signed after a specified date. The IRS then reconsidered and concluded that its original position was correct. This letter retroactively revokes the 2024 revocation, thereby reinstating the ruling that no amount is included in gross income before actual payment under the annuity option.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS's 2024 prospective revocation of the no-income-before-payment annuity ruling remain in effect?
  • Outcome: Revocation of the prior revocation, with the original ruling reinstated
  • Key authorities: IRC § 72

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202630002
Release Date: 7/24/2026
Index Number: 72.00-00

Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------

-----------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------

Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:B04
PLR-104852-26

Date:
April 28, 2026

Legend

Taxpayer = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           ------------

Date = ----------------------

Dear ----------------:

This letter revokes PLR 202426001 (PLR-103975-24) issued to Taxpayer on April 3,
2024. This revocation applies retroactively.

In PLR 201424014 (PLR-138374-13), the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) issued
two rulings with respect to a new term certain annuity option with variable payments (the
“New Annuity Option”) that Taxpayer intended to offer with non-qualified deferred
variable annuity contracts. In PLR 202426001, the Service revoked the second ruling,
that “[o]n and after the date an [o]wner elects the New Annuity Option, no amount will
be includible in gross income before it is actually paid under the New Annuity Option.”
This revocation applied prospectively only to contracts with applications signed after
Date.

The Service has reconsidered its position and has determined that the position taken in
PLR 201424014 was correct. Thus, the second ruling, that “[o]n and after the date an
[o]wner elects the New Annuity Option, no amount will be includible in gross income

PLR-104852-26
2

before it is actually paid under the New Annuity Option”, is reinstated by the revocation
of PLR 202426001.

This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code provides that a private letter ruling may not be used or cited
as precedent. In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are
sending a copy of this letter to the Taxpayer’s authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Kathryn Sneade
Branch Chief, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions and Products)

Cc:     -----------------------
        --------------------------------
        --------------
        -------------------------------
        --------------------------

        ----------------------------------
        ------------------------
        ------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace