Private Letter Ruling 202629008 Released July 17, 2026 Approved

Extension lets a fund self-certify late as a Qualified Opportunity Fund

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2026, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A limited liability company (taxed as a partnership) was formed to invest in an
Opportunity Zone and intended to be a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF), a vehicle
that lets investors defer and reduce tax on capital gains they roll into it. To
become a QOF, an entity has to "self-certify" each year by attaching Form 8996 to
its timely-filed tax return. The fund's accounting firm, hit by sudden staff
turnover close to the filing deadline, failed to attach Form 8996 to the fund's
first-year return and then filled the form out incorrectly the following year. A new
tax manager caught the errors, and the fund filed an administrative adjustment
request (AAR) for the first year with a corrected Form 8996 and asked the IRS for
relief under Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3. Because the fund acted
reasonably and in good faith (it relied on its tax professionals and asked for
relief before the IRS flagged the problem) and relief would not prejudice the
government, the IRS ruled the Form 8996 filed with the AAR counts as timely, so the
fund's QOF self-certification is effective as of the intended first-year date. The
IRS expressed no opinion on whether the fund actually meets the QOF requirements or
whether any investment in it qualifies.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should a fund get an extension to self-certify as a QOF where its preparer failed to attach Form 8996 to the first-year return?
  • Outcome: Approved (Form 8996 filed with the AAR treated as timely; QOF election effective as of the intended date)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2(d), (e)(4)(A); Treas. Reg. § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

 Internal Revenue Service                                      Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

 Number: 202629008                                             [Third Party Communication:
 Release Date: 7/17/2026                                       Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
 Index Number: 9100.00-00, 1400Z.02-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
 -------------------------                                     ------------------------------------, ID No. ------
 ----------------------------------------                      -----------------
 ----------------------------------------------------          Telephone Number:
 ---------------------------------------------                 --------------------
                                                               Refer Reply To:
                                                               CC:ITA:B01
                                                               PLR-116525-25
                                                               Date:
                                                               April 20, 2026



Legend:

 Taxpayer                           =    -----------------------------------------------------------------
 Date 1                             =    ---------------------------
 Date 2                             =    ---------------------
 Date 3                             =    --------------------------
 Date 4                             =    -------------------
 Date 5                             =    -----------------
 Date 6                             =    ---------------------------
 Date 7                             =    -----------------------
 Date 8                             =    ---------------------
 Month 1                            =    ------
 Year 1                             =    -------
 Year 2                             =    -------
 Year 3                             =    -------
 Year 4                             =    -------
 State                              =    --------------
 Managing Member                    =    -------------------------
 Partner                            =    ------------------------
 Tax Manager                        =    -----------------------
 Senior Manager                     =    --------------------------
 Accounting Firm 1                  =    ----------------
 Corporation 1                      =    -----------------------------------
 X                                  =    ---

Dear ----------------:

This letter responds to Taxpayer’s request for a ruling dated Date 1. Specifically,
Taxpayer requests relief under §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations, granting an extension of time to make an election under
§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations to self-certify as a Qualified
PLR-116525-25                               2

Opportunity Fund (QOF), as defined in § 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). The election would be effective as of Date 2 for Taxpayer’s initial tax year
ending on Date 3.

                                         FACTS

Taxpayer’s submission includes documents and the affidavits of individuals with
knowledge of Taxpayer’s affairs and tax matters. Taxpayer represents the facts as
follows:

Taxpayer is a limited liability company formed pursuant to the laws of State. Taxpayer
is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Taxpayer uses the accrual
method of accounting and reports income on a calendar year basis. Taxpayer is
managed by Managing Member and has X number of non-managing members
(collectively “member-owners”).

Taxpayer was formed in Year 1 for the purpose of investing in a qualified opportunity
zone property as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(2). A copy of Taxpayer’s amended and
restated limited liability company agreement reflects that the member-owners of the
Taxpayer intended for Taxpayer to qualify as a qualified opportunity fund, within the
meaning of § 1400Z-2(d)(1) and to meet the Code’s requirements pertaining to qualified
opportunity funds, by investing and holding equity interests in one or more qualified
opportunity zone businesses within the meaning of § 1400Z-2(d)(3).

In early Year 2, Accounting Firm 1 was engaged to prepare the federal partnership
returns for various entities related to investments in which the member-owners had
controlling interests, including Taxpayer’s Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership
Income, for Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3. Partner, a member of Accounting Firm 1,
managed and reviewed the work of the professionals at Accounting Firm 1 who were
responsible for the tax return preparation services provided to Taxpayer. He was
primarily responsible for the work product and deliverables (relevant returns and forms)
that were prepared for Taxpayer by the professionals from Accounting Firm 1.

During the return preparation, Accounting Firm 1 requested and Taxpayer provided to
Accounting Firm 1 all information relevant to prepare Form 1065 for Year 1, including
the limited liability company agreement reflecting that Taxpayer was formed for purpose
of investing in qualified opportunity zone property. Members of Accounting Firm 1
internally discussed completing and attaching Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund,
to Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for Year 1 as needed for Taxpayer to elect to self-certify as a
QOF.

Due to inadvertent oversight of personnel from Accounting Firm 1, the firm failed to
prepare or attach Form 8996 to the Taxpayer’s initial Form 1065 in Year 1. Accounting
Firm 1’s oversight was caused by a sudden and unusual turnover in personnel that
included multiple core members of the firm’s tax preparation team, resulting in a strain
PLR-116525-25                                3

on resources. Accounting Firm 1 experienced the loss of personnel at a time relatively
close to the due date for filing Taxpayer’s Year 1 Form 1065. For Year 2, Accounting
Firm 1 completed and attached Form 8996 to Taxpayer’s return but incorrectly indicated
that the first month in which the entity elected to be a QOF was in Year 2.

During Month 1, Year 4, while engaging in a comprehensive review of the taxpayer’s
prior year returns, Tax Manager, who served as the tax manager of Corporation 1 and
Taxpayer’s new tax manager, discovered that the Form 1065 of Taxpayer for Year 1 did
not include Form 8996 and that the Form 8996 attached to Form 1065 for Year 2 was
incorrectly prepared. On Date 4, Tax Manager contacted Senior Manager at
Accounting Firm 1 and communicated the discoveries. Subsequently, Senior Manager
contacted Partner to discuss the oversights involving Taxpayer’s returns and the failures
related to Form 8996. Partner then reviewed Taxpayer’s previously filed returns for
Year 1 through Year 3 and confirmed that Taxpayer’s return failed to include a
necessary Form 8996 and other issues existed with the Year 2 return and Form 8996
attached to such return.

In the early part of Date 5, Partner discussed the issues affecting the omitted and filed
Forms 8996 with Tax Manager and Managing Member. Partner informed them of the
effect the filing issues would have on the ability of Taxpayer to self-certify as a QOF.
Managing Member then promptly instructed Accounting Firm 1 to prepare and file a
request for relief under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations.

In conjunction with the filing of the ruling request on Date 1, Accounting Firm 1 prepared
an administrative adjustment request (AAR) for Year 1 and filed it with the Internal
Revenue Service (the Service) on Date 6. Accounting Firm included Taxpayer's Form
8996 with the Year 1 AAR.

Taxpayer requests that the Service rule that the Form 8996 included with Taxpayer’s
AAR for Year 1 be deemed timely filed and consequently, Taxpayer’s self-certification
as a QOF be effective as of Date 2.

As of the submission of the ruling request on Date 1, the additional information on Date
7 and Taxpayer’s partial modification of its ruling request on Date 8, Taxpayer has not
been contacted or notified by the Service about its failure to make the regulatory
election for Year 1.

                                  LAW AND ANALYSIS

       Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Code directs the Secretary to prescribe
regulations or rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the
Income Tax Regulations provides the rules for an entity to self-certify as a QOF.
Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to be certified as a QOF
must do so annually and timely in such form and manner as may be prescribed by the
PLR-116525-25                                 4

Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service forms or
instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund,
with its tax return for the year to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be
filed by the due date of the tax return (including extensions). The information provided
indicates that Taxpayer did not file its Form 8996 by the due date of its income tax
return due to Accounting Firm 1's failure to prepare Form 8996 and attach it to
Taxpayer’s Year 1 return.

Because § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for an entity to self-
certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in § 301.9100-1(b)
of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory
election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for
regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2) will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the
interests of the Government.

Under § 301.9100-3(b) a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good
faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is
discovered by the Service, or reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the
tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. However,
a taxpayer is not considered to have reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if
the taxpayer knew or should have known that the professional was not competent to
render advice on the regulatory election or was not aware of all relevant facts.

In addition, § 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—

       (i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been
       or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and
       the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is
       requested;

       (ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax
       consequences but chose not to make the election; or

       (iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
       original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service
       will not ordinarily grant relief.
PLR-116525-25                                 5

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable
extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced
if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate
for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the
election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the interests of the Government are ordinarily
prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made or
any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made
are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the
taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief would not prejudice the interests of the Government. Consequently, the Form
8996 included with Taxpayer’s AAR for Year 1, filed Date 6, is considered timely filed,
and Taxpayer has thereby made the election under § 1400Z-2 and § 1.1400Z2(d)-
1(a)(2)(i) to self-certify as a QOF for Year 1. Taxpayer’s election to self-certify is
effective as of Date 2. Taxpayer should submit a copy of this letter ruling to the Service
Center where Taxpayer files its returns along with a cover letter requesting that the
Service associate this ruling with the Form 1065 filed and Taxpayer's AAR for Year 1.

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This
office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling.
However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in
§ 1.1400Z2(a)–1(b)(34) or whether Taxpayer meets the requirements under § 1400Z-
2 and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF. We express no opinion regarding the
tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the
Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any
conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-116525-25                                  6

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.


                                         Sincerely,



                                         Gerald Semasek
                                         Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 5
                                         Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                         (Income Tax & Accounting)


 cc:     ------------------------
       -------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2026, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.