Extra time granted for a foreign insurer's lost 953(d) election to be taxed as a U.S. corporation

Number
202617011
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Election by Foreign Insurance Company to be Treated as Domestic Corporation
Code sections
§ 953, § 6072, § 6662, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 22, 2026
Publicly released
April 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2026, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A regulated insurance company organized in a foreign country, but wholly owned inside a U.S. corporate group, wanted to be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. tax purposes by making an election under Section 953(d). Its advisors recommended the election, and the group's tax staff prepared and, according to the taxpayer, timely filed the 953(d) election statement. Ever since, the company has been treated as domestic and included in the group's consolidated U.S. tax return. During an audit, however, the IRS found it had no record of receiving the election statement and had never issued an approval letter. The taxpayer asked for an extension of time under Treasury Regulation 301.9100-3. The IRS concluded the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith (it had relied on qualified tax professionals) and that relief would not prejudice the government, so it granted 60 days to make the election, effective back to the original year. The IRS cautioned that this is not a ruling that the company is otherwise eligible to make the election. This matters because a 953(d) election lets a foreign insurer be taxed like a U.S. company, and a lost or unacknowledged election can be rescued through 9100 relief.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the taxpayer get more time under § 301.9100-3 to make a § 953(d) election to be treated as a domestic corporation?
  • Outcome: Approved (60 days from the date of the letter)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 953(d); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2003-47; Notice 89-79

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202617011
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 4/24/2026
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 953.06-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------
-----------------, ID No. ------------------
-------------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------
--------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B02
PLR-117602-25
Date:
January 22, 2026

TY: ------

Legend

Taxpayer: ------------------------------- EIN: ----------------
Country X: ------------
Date 1: -------------------
Year 1: ------
Company A: -------------------------------------------------------- EIN: ----------------
Company B: ------------------------------ EIN: -------------------
Company C: -----------
EIN: ----------------
Accounting Firm: ---------------
Insurance Advisor: ------------------------------

Dear ------------:

This is in response to a letter dated September 30, 2025, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer by its authorized representative, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make the election provided by section 953(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. tax purposes effective for the taxable year ending Date 1, Year 1.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.

FACTS

Taxpayer is a regulated insurance company organized under the laws of Country X. Taxpayer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company A and is an affiliate of Company B, both U.S. corporations. Company C, also a U.S. corporation, is the ultimate parent company of the affiliated group that includes Taxpayer, Company A, and Company B, which files a consolidated federal income tax return.

Taxpayer represents that for the relevant years, Company A and Company B engaged the services of Accounting Firm and Insurance Advisor for the planning of Taxpayer's insurance program. Both Accounting Firm and Insurance Advisor concluded that it was advisable for Taxpayer to make an election under section 953(d) of the Code to be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. tax purposes.

Taxpayer represents that prior to filing its tax return for the taxable year ending Date 1, Year 1, Taxpayer submitted the section 953(d) statement in accordance with Rev. Proc. 2003-47, 2003-2 C.B. 55. A member of Company B's tax staff prepared the necessary statement and other attachments required to make an election under section 953(d) of the Code. Taxpayer represents its section 953(d) election statement was timely filed with the IRS and has provided supporting documentation of such filing. However, the IRS has no record of receiving Taxpayer's section 953(d) election statement, and thus, did not issue a letter in response to Taxpayer's section 953(d) election statement. Company C assumed Taxpayer's section 953(d) election was in order, and included Taxpayer in its U.S. consolidated return for the year ending Date 1, Year 1, and attached a copy of Taxpayer's section 953(d) election statement to its return.

Taxpayer represents that Company B's tax staff were qualified tax professionals, on whom Taxpayer relied to ensure that the section 953(d) election statement was properly filed and that all necessary elements required to effect the election were completed. Taxpayer further represents that, beginning with the Year 1 taxable year, Taxpayer has consistently been treated as if a valid section 953(d) election had been made: as a domestic corporation and a member of the consolidated group.

However, during an audit of Company C's U.S. consolidated return, the IRS asked Taxpayer for the approval of its section 953(d) election statement. Upon executing a search, Taxpayer was unable to locate such letter or any IRS documentation acknowledging Taxpayer's section 953(d) election statement.

Taxpayer represents that it does not seek to alter a return position for which the accuracy-related penalty has been or could have been imposed under section 6662 at the time Taxpayer requested relief and that it has not used hindsight to seek an extension of time to make the election. Taxpayer also represents that granting relief will not result in a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than it would have had if it had filed the section 953(d) election timely.

LAW AND ANAYLSIS

Under section 953(d), certain foreign insurance companies may elect to be treated as domestic corporations for U.S. tax purposes. The substantive and procedural rules for making a section 953(d) election are contained in Notice 89-79, 1989-2 C.B. 392, and Rev. Proc. 2003-47, 2003-2 C.B. 55. Rev. Proc. 2003-47 provides that the election must be filed by the due date prescribed in section 6072(b) (including extensions) for the U.S. income tax return that is due if the election becomes effective. Rev. Proc. 2003-47, section 4.04(2). In addition, an electing corporation must use the calendar year as its annual accounting period for U.S. tax purposes, unless it joins in the filing of a consolidated return and adopts the parent corporation's tax year. Notice 89-79, section 1. Rev. Proc. 2003-47 fixes the time to make the election under section 953(d). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to that section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (iii) of that section, a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if it meets one of the conditions described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100- 3(b)(1)(i) through (v):

(i) Requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the Internal Revenue Service;

(ii) Failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer's control;

(iii) Failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence (taking into account the taxpayer's experience and complexity of the return or issue), the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;

(iv) Reasonably relied on the written advice of the Internal Revenue Service; or

(v) Reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Further, the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(c)(1). The interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i).

Lastly, Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a) cautions that granting an extension of time to make an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election.

CONCLUSION

Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a). Taxpayer qualifies for an extension of time to make the election under section 953(d). Taxpayer is deemed to have acted in good faith, as defined by Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b), and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make the election provided by section 953(d), in accordance with the procedural rules set forth in Rev. Proc. 2003-47, to be treated as a domestic corporation for federal income tax purposes effective for the taxable year ending Date 1, Year 1.

The above extension of time is conditioned on Taxpayer's tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the section 953(d) election applies than it would have been if the election had been timely filed (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to Taxpayer's tax liability for the years involved. Further, the granting of the above extension is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the section 953(d) election. Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-1(a).

Taxpayer should attach a copy of this letter ruling to its federal income tax return for the relevant year.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

/s/ Kristine Crabtree

Kristine A. Crabtree
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
(International)

cc: ----------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
----------------------------------
-----------------------------

-------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
------------------------------------

--------------------------
-------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
-------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace