Determination Letter 202538026 Released September 19, 2025 Denied Transcribed from scan

Condominium association denied social-welfare exemption

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A condominium association maintained one building's roof, siding, plumbing, appliances, fencing, patios, landscaping, sidewalks, and alleyway. Unit owners were its only members and supplied all of its funding through dues. Although a walkway and alley were accessible to the public and exterior upkeep offered aesthetic and safety benefits, the IRS found those public benefits incidental. The association primarily maintained private residences and member-restricted property rather than serving a community comparable to a governmental unit. It denied exemption under § 501(c)(4), and the denial became final when the association did not protest within 30 days.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did a condominium association qualify as a social-welfare organization under IRC § 501(c)(4)?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(4); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(4)-1; Rev. Rul. 69-280; Rev. Rul. 74-17; Rev. Rul. 74-99; Flat Top Lake Association v. U.S.; Rancho Santa Fe v. U.S.

Full text (IRS public release)

Department of the Treasury Date:
Internal Revenue Service 6/26/2025
IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Employer ID number:

Form you must file:
Tax years:

Person to contact:
Name:
Release Number: 202538026 ID number:

Release Date: 9/19/2025 Telephone:
UIL Number: 501.04-00, 501.04-06, 501.04-07

Dear

This letter is our final determination that you don't qualify for exemption from federal income tax under Internal
Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(a) as an organization described in IRC Section 501(c)(4). Recently, we sent
you a proposed adverse determination in response to your application. The proposed adverse determination
explained the facts, law, and basis for our conclusion, and it gave you 30 days to file a protest. Because we
didn't receive a protest within the required 30 days, the proposed determination is now final.

You must file the federal income tax forms for the tax years shown above within 30 days from the date of this
letter unless you request an extension of time to file. For further instructions, forms, and information, visit
www.irs.gov.

We'll make this final adverse determination letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for
public inspection after deleting certain identifying information, as required by IRC Section 6110. Read the
enclosed Letter 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose - Rulings, and review the two attached letters that show our
proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Letter 437 on how
to notify us. If you agree with our deletions, you don't need to take any further action.

If you have questions about this letter, you can call the contact person shown above. If you have questions
about your federal income tax status and responsibilities, call our customer service number at 800-829-1040
(TTY 800-829-4933 for deaf or hard of hearing) or customer service for businesses at 800-829-4933.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosures:

Letter 437

Redacted Letter 4034
Redacted Letter 4038

Letter 4038 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 47632S

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

Date:

05/09/2025
Employer ID number:

Person to contact:

Name:
ID number:
Telephone:
Fax:
Legend: UIL:
B = Date 501.04-00
C = State 501.04-06
D = Number 501.04-07
E = Name
Dear

We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Internal Revenue
Code (IRC) Section 501(a). We determined that you don't qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(4).
This letter explains the reasons for our conclusion. Please keep it for your records.

Issues

Do you qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(4) as an organization operating as a homeowners’
association? No, for the reasons stated below.

Facts

You were formed on B, by incorporating in the state of C as a non-profit corporation with a stated purpose to
provide for architectural control, maintenance and preservation of the Condominium Units and Common
Elements, and to promote the health, safety and welfare of the residents. You oversee D condo units in a single
housing development building, located in E. The lot owners are the sole members of your association.

You represent that you are responsible for the building maintenance which includes roof siding, plumbing,
sewer, waste removal, and lighting; building appliances which include boiler, washer, dryer, and water heaters;
and general exterior maintenance including fencing, sidewalks, patios, landscaping, and alleyways.

You represent that certain of these exterior areas are maintained for aesthetic compliance with E. You
represent that “The public benefits from historical neighborhood designation in its urban setting. Exterior
lighting benefits the public as it enhances public safety, given the urban location. The roof and siding must be
well-kept in accordance with the historical neighborhood designation. This benefits the public from aesthetic
and neighborhood continuity perspectives.”

Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K

2

The only common area you maintain for public access/benefit is a public through-way created by the alleyway
and adjacent sidewalk which connects the main street to the back alley. However, you represent that general
exterior maintenance (fencing, sidewalks, patios, landscaping, alleyway) and building maintenance (roof,
siding, plumbing, sewer, waste removal, lighting) are for both public and private usage. You further represent
in the information request that the “[p]ublic benefits from sidewalk maintenance, fencing, landscaping and the
alleyway. The alleyway and adjacent sidewalk connect the main street to the back alley creating a public
through-way. The landscaping and fencing benefit the public by keeping the exterior of the building well-
groomed and the street-view free from clutter.”

You acknowledge that that usage of the building appliances (boiler, washer/dryer, water heaters) is private due
to the building appliances being located inside the building and further that “the patios are located internal to
the fencing and are primarily for member benefit for outdoor enjoyment. The fencing also benefits the
members by creating privacy from passers-by using the sidewalk.”

You represent that you are exclusively funded by dues assessed to the members of the association who are the
sole property owners being served by the association. Your expenses include occupancy, sewer line, boiler, and
repair expenses.

You stated in your application that “Individual owners own each of the properties covered by the HOA. Each
owner has 1 vote per property owned. Rules are created or amended by a majority vote of the owners.” You
also represent that “Every condominium owner, his family members, guests and licensees shall have a right
and easement of enjoyment in and to the Common Elements. The association may charge reasonable
admission and other fees for the use of any facility which is part of the common elements. The association
may also limit the number of guests or invitees of each owner which may use the Common elements and also
limit which unit owners have a right of use.”

Law

IRC Section 501(c)(4) allows exemption to civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated
exclusively for the promotion of social welfare. In general, to qualify for tax exemption as a social welfare
organization described in Section 501(c)(4), an organization (1) must not be organized or operated for profit,
(2) must be operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, and (3) no part of the organization’s net
earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treasury Regulation Section 1.501(c)(4)-1(a)(2) provides that an organization is operated exclusively for the
promotion of social welfare if it is primarily engaged in promoting in some way the common good and general
welfare of the people of the community. An organization embraced within this section is one which is operated
primarily for the purpose of bringing about civic betterments and social improvements.

Revenue Ruling 69-280 held that a nonprofit organization formed to provide maintenance of exterior walls and
roofs of homes of members who own houses in a development is not exempt as a social welfare organization
under Section 501(c)(4). The organization in Rev. Rul. 69-280 was a nonprofit membership corporation
formed to provide services for the homeowners in a housing development. The services consisted of painting
exterior walls and repairing roofs. If a person purchased a unit in the housing development, he was required to
become a member of the organization. The organization was supported entirely by annual dues charged to

Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K

3

members. The dues were based on the estimated expenses of the organization plus an amount for reserves to
cover large expenditures, such as replacement of roofs. The IRS concluded that this organization was not
exempt because it is performing services that its members would otherwise have to provide for themselves.
Therefore, the organization was operated primarily for the private benefit of members and not operated
primarily for the common good and general welfare of the people of the community.

Rev. Rul. 74-17 held that an organization does not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) where it was
formed by the unit owners of a condominium housing project to provide for the management, maintenance, and
care of the common areas of the project, as defined by State statute, with membership assessments paid by the
unit owners. Condominium ownership involves ownership in common by all condominium unit owners of a
great many so-called common areas, the maintenance and care of which necessarily constitutes the provision of
private benefits for the unit owners. Rev. Rul. 74-17 held that since the organization's activities are for the
private benefit of its members, it cannot be said to be operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

Rev. Rul. 74-99 held that in order to qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(4), a homeowners association:
(1) must serve a “community” which bears a reasonable relationship to an area ordinarily identified as a
governmental unit; (2) it must not conduct activities directed to the exterior maintenance of private residences;
and (3) the common areas or facilities it owns must be for the use and enjoyment of the general public.

In Flat Top Lake Association v. U.S., 868 F.2d (4th Cir. 1989), the Court held that a homeowners association
did not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) when it did not benefit a “community” bearing a
recognizable relationship to a governmental unit and when its common areas or facilities were not for the use
and enjoyment of the general public. The organization in Flat Top Lake Association had 375 lots in the
development with 80 families residing there. The organization did undertake certain quasi-governmental tasks
including constructing a bridge, maintaining common areas such as a road, a park, and a lake, and providing
waste disposal for residents. The organization also paid for a “conservator of the peace” to perform law
enforcement duties. Despite this, the court held that this was not a “community” because it is a private
environment for its members and cannot claim a tax exemption for benefitting itself.

In Rancho Santa Fe v. U.S., 589 F. Supp 54 (S.D. Cal. 1984), the court interpreted Rev. Rul. 74-99 and held that
a homeowners’ association serving residents of a housing development of 3,000 homeowners constituted a
community and qualified for exemption under section 501(c)(4). Of the 600 acres of land within the
development, 465 acres, consisting of parks, hiking trails, open space, athletic fields, a public parking lot,
playgrounds, and a community club house, were available to the general public on an unrestricted basis. The
remaining 135 acres, consisting of a golf course and tennis courts, was restricted to only the members of the
association. The organization also loaned out its facilities free of charge to public service organizations and
schools. The court found that the homeowners’ association performed the functions of a governmental entity
and brought about civic betterments and social improvements on an unrestricted basis that would be missed by
the community without the activities of the organization. Thus, the court concluded that the benefits to the
organization benefited the social welfare of the general public of the community thereby meeting the
requirements of section 501(c)(4).

Application of law
You were formed and are operated to maintain private condominiums. You are not operated exclusively for the

Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K

4

promotion of social welfare within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(4)-1(a)(2) because you are
operated exclusively for the private benefit of your members rather than for the benefit of the community as a
whole.

You do not meet the three-prong test promulgated by Revenue Ruling 74-99 for a homeowners association to
qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(4). The first prong of the test is that you must serve a “community”
which bears a reasonable relationship to an area ordinarily identified as a governmental unit. You are a
condominium association of D units where the only public access is an alleyway connecting two streets. You
are like the organization in Top Lake Association which also did not meet this prong of the test, despite having
375 lots, constructing a bridge, having a law enforcement officer, and maintaining roads, a park, and a lake.

You also do not meet the second prong of the test because your primary activity is to provide maintenance and
operational services for the benefit of the D condominium owners and residents. You conduct activities directed
to the exterior maintenance of private residences, such as roof inspection, lawn maintenance, light installation,
and keeping the exterior in compliance with historical guidelines.

Your position is that by maintaining the exterior of the building, you provide the public aesthetically. Not only
is this an incidental public benefit because it is something the owners would do on their own, it is in accordance
with local requirements, and it is far away from concrete public benefits such as a park or athletic field, but it
also means that one of the few public benefits you claim is prohibited by the second prong of the test.

Further, you fail the third prong of the test because your common areas or facilities are not used or enjoyed by
the generic public with the exception of a small public walkway. An alley that may be used by the public is too
incidental a public benefit because the alley is primarily for the benefit of people living in the condo. This
would be akin to a road in a subdivision that connected members of a homeowners association.

You are unlike the organization described in Rancho Santa Fe vs. U.S. because you do not offer facilities or
other amenities to the general public on an unrestricted basis. You do not perform the functions of a
governmental entity, nor do you provide social benefit to the general public that may constitute social welfare
activities within the meaning of IRC Section 501(c)(4).

Additionally, you are like the organization described in Revenue Ruling 69-280 because you operate primarily
for the private benefit of your members rather than for the community. Your income is entirely from
membership dues and the great majority of your expenses are used to and enjoyed by the condo owners rather
than the general public. Plumbing repairs, building maintenance including washer, dryer, and water heaters;
boiler replacement, roof inspection, and sewer line replacement are items that can be serviced and/or replaced
by the owners of each of the individual condominiums. The only common area you maintain for public access is
a public through-way. You primarily maintain the exterior of the condominium buildings including exterior
lighting, fencing, sidewalks, and patios for cosmetic reasons. These items are restricted and can only be
assessed by members and their limited guests, indicating that these benefits are not for the general public or a
vital public venue such as parks or recreational facilities.

You also are like the organization described in Revenue Ruling 74-17 because your organization primarily
serves the private interest of the condominium owners. Your organization does assist with some exterior

Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K

5

lighting, landscaping, and the walk through, but this assistance is not your primary function. Your primary
function is the maintenance of the building where the condominiums are located, the maintenance of appliances
in each condominium, and restricted exterior maintenance including patios, fencing, and landscaping. The
primary function listed above minimally serves the community as a whole and does not focus on the social
welfare of the community except for cosmetic purposes.

Conclusion

Based on the information submitted, you are not organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes within
the meaning of IRC Section 501(c)(4). You are organized and operated primarily for the private interests of
your members and do not promote the social welfare of the community as a whole. Accordingly, you do not
qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(4).

If you agree

If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don’t need to do anything. If we don’t hear from
you within 30 days, we'll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on
your income tax filing requirements.

If you don't agree
You have a right to protest if you don’t agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, send us a
protest within 30 days of the date of this letter. You must include:

  • Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone number

  • A statement of the facts, law, and arguments supporting your position

  • A statement indicating whether you are requesting an Appeals Office conference

  • The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
    organization or your authorized representative

  • The following declaration:

For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this request, or this modification to the
request, including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request
or the modification contains all relevant facts relating to the request, and such facts are true, correct,
and complete.

Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the
IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if they haven’t
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the
IRS and Power of Attorney.

We’ll review your protest statement and decide if you gave us a basis to reconsider our determination. If so,
we’ll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven’t given us a basis
for reconsideration, we’ll send your case to the Appeals Office and notify you. You can find more information
in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Determination on Tax-Exempt Status.

If you don’t file a protest within 30 days, you can’t seek a declaratory judgment in court later because the
law requires that you use the IRC administrative process first (IRC Section 7428(b)(2)).

Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K

6

Where to send your protest
Send your protest, Form 2848, if applicable, and any supporting documents to the applicable address:

U.S. mail: Street address for delivery service:
Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service

EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Mail Stop 6403 550 Main Street, Mail Stop 6403

PO Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202

Cincinnati, OH 45201

You can also fax your protest and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If you
fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that they received it.

You can get the forms and publications mentioned in this letter by visiting our website at www.irs.gov/forms-
pubs or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676). If you have questions, you can contact the person listed at
the top of this letter.

Contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Service

The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS that can help protect your
taxpayer rights. TAS can offer you help if your tax problem is causing a hardship, or if you’ve tried but haven’t
been able to resolve your problem with the IRS. If you qualify for TAS assistance, which is always free, TAS
will do everything possible to help you. Visit www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov or call 877-777-4778.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Letter 4034 (Rev. 01-2021)
Catalog Number 47628K

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.