Late qualified opportunity fund certification accepted

Number
202532009
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Special Rules for Capital Gains Invested in Opportunity Zones; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 1400Z-2, § 6110, § 6662
Ruling dated
May 8, 2025
Publicly released
August 8, 2025

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership intended to self-certify as a qualified opportunity fund beginning in a particular month. Its original accountant incorrectly concluded that no federal return was required and did not know that the partnership needed to file a return with Form 8996 to make the certification. A later opportunity-zone adviser discovered the omission, prepared the return and form, and sought relief. The IRS found reasonable reliance on a tax professional, good faith, and no prejudice to the government. It treated the filed Form 8996 as timely and accepted the self-certification from the intended month, without deciding whether the partnership otherwise met the QOF requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership's late Form 8996 self-certification as a qualified opportunity fund be treated as timely?
  • Outcome: Approved because the partnership reasonably relied on an accountant and relief did not prejudice the government
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202532009
Release Date: 8/8/2025
Index Number: 1400Z.02-00, 9100.00-00

Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B08
PLR-120970-24
Date:
May 08, 2025

LEGEND

Taxpayer = -----------------------------------------------------------

Accountant P = -----------------------------

Accountant Q = -----------------------

Month 1 = -------------------------

Month 2 = -------------------------

Date 1 = -------------------------

Date 2 = --------------------------

Date 3 = ----------------

Date 4 = --------------------------

State = -------------

Year 1 = -------

Member A = ------------------------------------------------------------------

PLR-120970-24 2

Member B = ------------------------------------------

X = --------

Y = ----

Dear ---------------:

This letter responds to Taxpayer's request for a letter ruling dated Date 4. Specifically, Taxpayer requests relief under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-31 for an extension of time to make an election to self-certify as a qualified opportunity fund (QOF), as defined in section 1400Z-2(d), effective as of Month 1.

FACTS

According to the information and representations provided, Taxpayer, a limited liability Company (LLC) treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes, was formed on Date 1 in State. Pursuant to the terms of the LLC operating agreement, Taxpayer was formed for the primary purpose of investing into, holding, managing, and disposing of qualified opportunity zone property, and to do anything and all things permitted by section 1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder necessary or appropriate for this purpose. The operating agreement further states that Taxpayer will self-certify as a QOF by filing Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund, with the Taxpayer’s federal tax return for the taxable year in which the certification is made. Taxpayer represents that it operates on a calendar year tax year and utilizes the cash method of accounting. On its Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, for its Year 1 taxable year, Taxpayer indicated that Taxpayer had two members in Year 1, Member A and Member B, who owned X and Y percent, respectively, of the interests in Taxpayer.

Taxpayer represents that it intended to elect to self-certify as a QOF beginning in Month

  1. Taxpayer engaged Accountant P to prepare Taxpayer’s Federal income tax returns
    for Year 1 and subsequent years. Accountant P represents that based on information received from Member B, Accountant P determined that Taxpayer was not required to file a federal income tax return for Year 1. Accountant P further represents that due to being unfamiliar with the requirements under section 1400Z-2, Accountant P failed to advise Taxpayer of the necessity to file a federal income tax return in order to self- certify Taxpayer as a QOF. As such, Taxpayer did not timely file a federal income tax return and Form 8996 for Year 1.

Taxpayer represents that on Date 2, it engaged Accountant Q to consult on opportunity zone compliance and consulting. Taxpayer represents that after conversing with

1 Unless otherwise specified, all “section” references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and all “§” references to sections of the Treasury Regulations (26 CFR Part 1) or (26 CFR Part 301).

PLR-120970-24 3

Accountant Q, Taxpayer learned in Month 2 of its failure to timely file a Form 8996 to self-certify Taxpayer as a QOF. Subsequently, Taxpayer engaged Accountant Q to prepare a federal income tax return and Form 8996 for Year 1, which Taxpayer represents filing on Date 3. Taxpayer proceeded to also engage Accountant Q to file this request for a private letter ruling.

Taxpayer represents that all its federal income tax returns have been filed consistent with the intended election to self-certify as a QOF and the granting of its requested ruling would not result in Taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for Year 1 and all subsequent taxable years affected by the election than if the election had been timely made.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1400Z-2(e)(4) directs the Secretary to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of section 1400Z-2, including rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the self-certification of a QOF must be timely-filed and effectuated annually in such form and manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service (Service) forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The Instructions to Form 8996 published pursuant to these regulations specify that to self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 with its tax return for the year to which the certification applies by the due date of the tax return (including extensions).

Section 301.9100-3(a) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2) will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—

(i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service;

(ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer's control;

(iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;

(iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or

PLR-120970-24 4

(v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

In addition, § 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—

(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested;

(ii) was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or

(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief (if specific facts have changed since the original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service will not ordinarily grant relief).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief. Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).

CONCLUSION

The information and representations provided indicates that Taxpayer did not timely file its Form 8996 by the due date of its federal income tax return for Year 1 due to Taxpayer’s reasonable reliance on Accountant P and Accountant P’s failure to file a Form 8996 on behalf of Taxpayer. Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, including affidavits and representations under penalties of perjury, we conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. Accordingly, based solely on the facts and information submitted, and the representations made in the ruling request, the Form 8996 attached to Taxpayer’s return for Year 1, filed Date 4, is considered timely filed, and Taxpayer has thereby made the election under section 1400Z-2 and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) to self-certify as a QOF beginning Month 1. Taxpayer should submit a copy of this letter ruling to the Service Center where Taxpayer files its returns along with a cover letter requesting that the Service associate this ruling with the Year 1 tax return.

PLR-120970-24 5

CAVEATS

The granting of an extension of time in this ruling letter is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to self-certify as a QOF. See § 301.9100-1(a).

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by the appropriate parties. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual information, representations, and other data submitted.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is either expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, we have no opinion, either express or implied, concerning whether any investments made in Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in § 1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(34) or whether Taxpayer meets the requirements under section 1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder to be treated as a QOF. In addition, we also express no opinion on whether any interest owned in any entity by Taxpayer qualifies as qualified opportunity zone property, as defined in section 1400Z-2(d)(2), or whether such entity would be treated as a qualified opportunity zone business, as defined in section 1400Z-2(d)(3). We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is disclosed under section 6110.

Pursuant to the Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to Taxpayer's authorized representatives.

PLR-120970-24 6

Sincerely,

Dominic D. DiMattia
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 8
Office of Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)

cc: --------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace