Private Letter Ruling 202528008 Released July 11, 2025 Approved

Late Form 8996 treated as timely for opportunity fund certification

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership formed to invest in qualified opportunity zone property relied on a longtime accountant to handle its tax compliance. The accountant did not know that Form 8996 was required and omitted it from the partnership's first-year return. The accountant discovered the requirement while preparing the next year's return and later filed an amended first-year return with Form 8996. The IRS concluded that the partnership reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, acted in good faith, and satisfied the requirements for regulatory relief. It treated the late Form 8996 as timely filed, while expressing no opinion on whether the partnership or its investments otherwise met the qualified opportunity fund rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the partnership's late Form 8996 be treated as timely for qualified opportunity fund self-certification?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202528008 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/11/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1400Z.02-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------- -------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------- ---------------------
------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B05
PLR-120087-24
Date:
April 10, 2025

                                                  LEGEND

                      Taxpayer             = ---------------------------------------------------
                      State                = -------------
                      Entity               = ------------------------------------
                      Accountant           = ----------------------
                      Firm                 = --------------------------------
                      Date 1               = -------------------------
                      Date 2               = ---------------------
                      Date 3               = --------------
                      Date 4               = ----------------------
                      Date 5               = -------------------
                      Date 6               = ----------------------
                      Date 7               = -----------------------
                      Date 8               = -----------------------
                      Year 1               = -------
                      Year 2               = -------

Dear --------------------:

This responds to Taxpayer’s request received by the Internal Revenue Service
(Service) on Date 8, for relief under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure
and Administration Regulations. Specifically, Taxpayer requests an extension of time to
file Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund, to (1) self-certify as a qualified opportunity
fund (QOF), as defined in Section 1400Z-1(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code),
and (2) to be treated as a QOF, effective as of Month, as provided under Section
1400Z-2 of the Code and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations.

PLR-120087-24 2

                                     FACTS

Taxpayer has represented that the facts are as follows:

Taxpayer is a limited liability company organized under the laws of State on Date 2 and
is classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Taxpayer was formed for
the purpose of investing in qualified opportunity zone property as defined in Section
1400Z-2(d)(2) of the Code.

Taxpayer’s members began investing on Date 3 to fund Taxpayer's investment in Entity.
Taxpayer represents that some of these member contributions were qualified capital
gains that were eligible for deferral on their personal income tax returns.

On Date 4, Taxpayer engaged Accountant, tax partner at Firm, to assist with their tax
compliance obligations for Year 1. Accountant had been the accountant for Taxpayer’s
investors and their medical practice for 15 years and had over 20 years of experience.
The members of Taxpayer believed that Accountant would adequately assist Taxpayer
with filing the required returns and forms to qualify Taxpayer as a QOF. However,
Accountant was unaware of the requirement to file Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity
Fund, and failed to attach a Form 8996 to the Taxpayer’s Form 1065, U.S. Return of
Partnership Income, for Year 1, filed on or about Date 5.

On Date 6, Taxpayer again engaged Accountant to prepare Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for
Year 2. While preparing this return, Accountant discovered that Form 8996 existed and
did further research on the rules for filing this form. Accountant included a properly
completed Form 8996 on the Year 2 tax return and made a note that the Year 1 tax
return omitted the form and needed to be amended.

Accountant prepared the amended Form 1065 for Year 1, which was eventually
approved for filing by the Taxpayer, and was filed with the Service on Date 7. Because
the Form 8996 was filed after the original due date, including extensions, for the
Taxpayer’s return for Year 1, Taxpayer failed to self-certify as a QOF.

After Taxpayer became aware of the consequences of failing to timely file the Form
8996, this request for relief was promptly submitted under Sections 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3. Taxpayer represents that it relied on Accountant to timely file Form 8996.
Taxpayer further represents that granting of the relief under Section 301.9100-3 will not
result in a lower tax liability for the years affected by the election.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code directs the Secretary to
prescribe regulations for rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)
of the Income Tax Regulations provides the rules for an entity to self-certify as a QOF.
Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that an entity electing to be certified as a QOF
must do so annually on a timely filed return in such form and manner as may be

PLR-120087-24 3

prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service
forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 with its tax return for the year
to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the
tax return (including extensions). The information provided indicates that Taxpayer did
not file its Form 8996 by the due date of its income tax return (including extensions).

Because § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for an entity to self-
certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in § 301.9100-1(b)
of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory
election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for
regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2) will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the
interests of the government.

Under § 301.9100-3(b), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good
faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is
discovered by the Service, or reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the
tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. However,
a taxpayer is not considered to have reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if
the taxpayer knew or should have known that the professional was not competent to
render advice on the regulatory election or was not aware of all relevant facts.

Under § 301.9100-3(b)(3), a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably and in
good faith if the taxpayer—

   (i)     seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has
           been or could be imposed under Section 6662 at the time the taxpayer
           requests relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory
           election for which relief is requested;
   (ii)    was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and
           related tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or
   (iii)   uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
           original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the
           Service will not ordinarily grant relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable
extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.

PLR-120087-24 4

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the government are prejudiced
if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate
for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the
election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the interests of the government are ordinarily
prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made or
any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made
are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under Section 6501(a) before the
taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting relief under § 301.9100-3.

Based on the facts and information submitted, and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Taxpayer reasonably relied on a
qualified tax professional, and the tax professional failed to timely make, or advise the
taxpayer to make, the election. Accordingly, based solely on the facts and information
submitted, and the representations made in the ruling request, Taxpayer has satisfied
the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief and Taxpayer’s Form 8996,
filed on Date 7, is considered timely filed.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in §
1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(34) or whether Taxpayer meets the requirements under Section
1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF. We express no opinion on
whether any interest in any entity owned by Taxpayer qualifies as QOZ property, as
defined in Section 1400Z-2(d)(2), or whether such entity would be treated as a QOZ
business, as defined in Section 1400Z-2(d)(3).

We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the
provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or
regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting
from, the instant transaction.

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This
office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling.
However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by

PLR-120087-24 5

attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to Taxpayer's authorized representative.

                                               Sincerely,




                                               Alina N. Lewandowski
                                               Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 5
                                               Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                               (Income Tax and Accounting)

CC: ---------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.