Determination Letter 202527016 Released July 3, 2025 Revocation Transcribed from scan

IRS revoked a foundation that used fundraising to pay members' private expenses

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS revoked a private foundation's section 501(c)(3) status because its fundraising primarily benefited participating families and a related for-profit youth athletics program. Families received fundraising profits in proportion to what they raised, and those amounts were credited toward their children's tuition and other program expenses. The IRS found private benefit and inurement because families that did not fundraise received no comparable benefit, while the arrangement also supported the related business. The foundation also failed the organizational test because its bylaws supported the for-profit program and did not adequately dedicate assets to exempt purposes on dissolution. A prior IRS examination had warned the foundation that offsetting individual accounts was inurement, but the practice continued.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the foundation remain organized and operated exclusively for section 501(c)(3) purposes?
  • Outcome: Revocation
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501, 502, 503, 507, and 509; Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1

Full text (IRS public release)

Department of the Treasury Date:

Internal Revenue Service April 8, 2025
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Taxpayer ID number (last 4 digits):
Form:

Tax periods ended:

Person to contact:

ID number:
Telephone:

Release Number: 202527016

Release Date: 7/3/2025 Last day to file petition with United States
UIL Code: 501.03-00 Tax Court:
July 7, 2025

CERTIFIED MAIL - Return Receipt Requested

Dear

Why we are sending you this letter
This is a final determination that you don’t qualify for exemption from federal income tax under Internal

Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(a) as an organization described in IRC Section 501(c)(3), effective
Your determination letter dated , is revoked.

Our adverse determination as to your exempt status was made for the following reasons: You do not meet the
organizational test nor the operational tests. Treasury Regulation Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) states that an
organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in IRC
Section 501(c)(3). If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not

exempt.

Organizations that are not exempt under IRC Section 501 generally are required to file federal income tax returns
and pay tax, where applicable. For further instructions, forms and information please visit IRS.gov.

Because you were a private foundation as of the effective date of the adverse determination, you are considered
to be a taxable private foundation until you terminate your private foundation status under IRC Section 507.

In addition to your income tax return, you must also continue to file Form 990-PF, Return of Private Foundation
or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation, by the 15th day of the fifth month after the end of

your annual accounting period.

Contributions to your organization are no longer deductible under IRC Section 170.

What you must do if you disagree with this determination

If you want to contest our final determination, you have 90 days from the date this determination letter was
mailed to you to file a petition or complaint in one of the three federal courts listed below.

How to file your action for declaratory judgment
If you decide to contest this determination, you can file an action for declaratory judgment under the provisions

of Section 7428 of the Code in either:
• The United States Tax Court,
• The United States Court of Federal Claims, or
• The United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Letter 6337 (Rev. 3-2024)
Catalog Number 74808E

You must file a petition or complaint in one of these three courts within 90 days from the date we mailed this
determination letter to you. You can download a fillable petition or complaint form and get information about
filing at each respective court's website listed below or by contacting the Office of the Clerk of the Court at one
of the addresses below. Be sure to include a copy of this letter and any attachments and the applicable filing fee
with the petition or complaint.

You can eFile your completed U.S. Tax Court petition by following the instructions and user guides available
on the Tax Court website at ustaxcourt.gov/dawson.html. You will need to register for a DAWSON account to
do so. You may also file your petition at the address below:

United States Tax Court
400 Second Street, NW
Washington, DC 20217
ustaxcourt.gov

The websites of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia contain
instructions about how to file your completed complaint electronically. You may also file your complaint at one of
the addresses below:

US Court of Federal Claims

717 Madison Place, NW

Washington, DC 20439

uscfc.uscourts.gov

US District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001

dcd.uscourts.gov

Processing of income tax returns and assessments of any taxes due will not be delayed if you file a petition for
declaratory judgment under IRC Section 7428.

We’ll notify the appropriate state officials (as permitted by law) of our determination that you aren’t an
organization described in IRC Section 501(c)(3).

The IRS office whose phone number appears at the top of the notice can best address and access your tax
information and help get you answers. However, you may be eligible for free help from the Taxpayer Advocate
Service (TAS) if you can’t resolve your tax problem with the IRS or if you believe an IRS procedure just isn't
working as it should. TAS is an independent organization within the IRS that helps taxpayers and protects
taxpayer rights. Visit TaxpayerAdvocate.IRS.gov/contact-us or call 877-777-4778 (TTY/TDD 800-829-4059)
to find the location and phone number of your local advocate. Learn more about TAS and your rights under the
Taxpayer Bill of Rights at TaxpayerAdvocate.IRS.gov. Do not send your Tax Court petition to TAS. Use the
Tax Court address provided earlier in the letter. Contacting TAS does not extend the time to file a petition.

Where you can find more information
Enclosed are Publication 1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer, and Publication 594, The IRS Collection Process, for

more comprehensive information.

Find tax forms or publications by visiting IRS.gov/forms or calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676). If you
have questions, you can call the person shown at the top of this letter.

If you prefer to write, use the address shown at the top of this letter. Include your telephone number, the best
time to call, and a copy of this letter.

Letter 6337 (Rev. 3-2024)
Catalog Number 74808E

You may fax your documents to the fax number shown above, using either a fax machine or online fax service.
Protect yourself when sending digital data by understanding the fax service's privacy and security policies.

Keep the original letter for your records.

Sincerely,

Lynn A. Brinkley
Director, Exempt Organizations Examinations

Enclosures:
Publication 1
Publication 594
Publication 892

Letter 6337 (Rev. 3-2024)
Catalog Number 74808E

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Tax Exempt and Government Entities
Exempt Organizations Examinations

Date: January 17, 2025
Taxpayer ID number:

Form:
Tax periods ended:

Person to contact:
Name:

ID number:
Telephone:
Fax:

Address:

Manager's contact information:
ID number:

Telephone:
Response due date:

CERTIFIED MAIL - Return Receipt Requested

Dear
Why you’re receiving this letter

If you agree

If you haven’t already, please sign the enclosed Form 6018, Consent to Proposed Action, and return it to the
contact person shown at the top of this letter. We'll issue a final adverse letter determining that you aren't an
organization described in IRC Section 501(c)(3) for the periods above.

If you disagree

  1. Request a meeting or telephone conference with the manager shown at the top of this letter.

  2. Send any information you want us to consider.

  3. File a protest with the IRS Appeals Office. If you request a meeting with the manager or send additional
    information as stated in 1 and 2, above, you'll still be able to file a protest with IRS Appeals Office after
    the meeting or after we consider the information.

The IRS Appeals Office is independent of the Exempt Organizations division and resolves most disputes
informally. If you file a protest, the auditing agent may ask you to sign a consent to extend the period of
limitations for assessing tax. This is to allow the IRS Appeals Office enough time to consider your case.
For your protest to be valid, it must contain certain specific information, including a statement of the
facts, applicable law, and arguments in support of your position. For specific information needed for a
valid protest, refer to Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Determination on Tax-Exempt Status.

Fast Track Mediation (FTM) referred to in Publication 3498, The Examination Process, generally doesn’t
apply now that we’ve issued this letter.

  1. Request technical advice from the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt Government Entities)
    if you feel the issue hasn’t been addressed in published precedent or has been treated inconsistently by the
    IRS.

Letter 3618 (Rev. 3-2024)
Catalog Number 34809F

If you’re considering requesting technical advice, contact the person shown at the top of this letter. If you
disagree with the technical advice decision, you will be able to appeal to the IRS Appeals Office, as
explained above. A decision made in a technical advice memorandum, however, generally is final and
binding on Appeals.

If we don't hear from you
If you don't respond to this proposal within 30 calendar days from the date of this letter, we'll issue a final
adverse determination letter.

Contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Office is a taxpayer right

The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS that can help protect your
taxpayer rights. TAS can offer you help if your tax problem is causing a hardship, or you've tried but haven't
been able to resolve your problem with the IRS. If you qualify for TAS assistance, which is always free, TAS
will do everything possible to help you. Visit www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov or call 877-777-4778.

Additional information
You can get any of the forms and publications mentioned in this letter by visiting our website at
www.irs.gov/forms-pubs or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).

If you have questions, you can contact the person shown at the top of this letter.

Sincerely,

Denise Gonzalez
Group Manager, Exempt Organization Examinations
Enclosures:
Form 886-A
Form 6018
Form 4621-A
Publication 892
Publication 3498

Letter 3618 (Rev. 3-2024)
Catalog Number 34809F

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service Schedule number
. or exhibit
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended
Issue:
Whether (hereafter the Foundation) continues to qualify for exemption as an

organization described in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3).

Facts:
was formed in and is a for-profit owned and operated by ( ).
is located at and provides classes
to children between the ages of and
organized the Foundation as an unincorporated association in the state of .On ;
, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determined the Foundation was exempt from federal income tax under
IRC Section 501(c)(3), effective , and classified the Foundation as a private foundation within the

meaning of IRC Section 509(a).
The Foundation’s Articles of Association state its primary purpose is to provide a community service by:

• Fundraising for athletes’ expenses (i.e., uniforms, shoes, bows, dance attire, competition fees, tumbling, and
monthly tuition expenses, and travel costs).

• Sharing information among all parents of the

• Assisting new families to the program on how the program works and ways in which they can help as part of
the

• Organizing events such as basket parties, cash bashes, end of year banquet, team bonding activities, and
general fundraising information.

The Foundation does not provide any or _ Its principal office is in

Form 1023-EZ, Streamlined Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Form 1023-EZ), was submitted on , and signed by , Vice President of
the Foundation. In Part, Specific Activities of Form 1023-EZ, the Foundation declared it was organized and
operated exclusively to

In : expanded its facility by adding an additional with a competition regulation size spring
floor and practice areas for athletes. In , began offering a training¹ option in

Catalog Number 20810W Page 1 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended
addition to its training. That same year, name was changed to
. However, the name on its bank account, :
remained the same.
In and , the Foundation amended its by-laws. The by-laws state the Foundation
“ ” by assisting its members with
“ *: providing information to its members; and organizing
p 8 B 8

+e ch]

The by-laws also state that the Foundation “is in no way to interfere with or impede the day-to-day business
operations and/or business decisions associated with ”

+

Upon dissolution, is authorized to take possession of all account funds and use the funds for the members
children’s outstanding expenses (e.g., uniforms, shoes, choreography fees, bows, etc.) at until all
funds have been depleted. However, if both the Foundation and are dissolved, all funds will be
donated to a “non-profit organization chosen by the executive board and owner, aa

In , held seats on the executive board -- president and owner of . The remaining
board seats were occupied by family members:

• Vice President
• Treasurer —

• Secretary -

As the owner of was authorized to provide input and vote on any necessary business during
board meetings, delegate responsibility to board members and members, and ensure that all responsibilities are
being carried out to benefit the program. During board meetings, the board often discussed
matters relating to (e.g., past due accounts and coaching assignments).

also had the authority to sign checks and make deposits with only her signature required and accepted

payments on behalf of the Foundation and via her personal account. According to
statement, she received $ and $ in payments relating to the Foundation and
, respectively.

provides all athletes and members with a copy of the Information Packet for

  • Season (hereafter Information Packet). The Information Packet states the
    mission is to enrich the lives of the athletes and their families through the sport of

training is ( days per for an hour and ; and full-season training is ( } days a for hours.

  • is also referred to ; program, and the program in the
    by-laws and Information Packet for

Catalog Number 20810W Page 2 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

D. - i Schedule number
Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service

  • hibi
    (May 2017) Explanations of Items orexnns

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended

The Information Packet sets forth the guidelines for Foundation membership and fundraisers as well as the tuition
and fees charged by

The cost for the and seasons of competitive classes in for families
with multiple athletes was as follows:

Teams First Child Second Child

$ $

$ $
Members are required to pay all expenses relating to their children’s tuition,
registration fees, uniforms, shoes, bows, choreography, and Foundation membership to . The
Information Packet states:
[t]he cannot cover your expenses for the entire season. Please plan accordingly and use fundraisers that are
available each month ... The needs to be able to pay its bills so that it operates efficiently. Your individual

account needs to be kept current so that your athletes’ expenses can be paid (i.e., uniforms, choreography,
accessories, competition fees).

offers several payment options to members such as monthly tuition payments, credit card payments, and
income tax return payments where parents pre-pay for the upcoming season in advance. The only discounts provided

are for dual participation.

Membership in the Foundation is available to all parents who sign their children up for

classes at and pay a $__ registration fee ($1 of the registration fee pays for membership in the
Foundation). Only members with accounts in good standing at have the right to vote. Membership
may be denied by members or the executive board by a majority vote with consent.

The Foundation sponsors general sales and optional sales fundraisers. All athletes and members are required to
participate in general sales fundraisers per year which include ticket sales, basket parties, cash bashes, jewelry

bashes, etc. These sales help the Foundation pay for the party and banquet along with
offsetting unexpected additional costs, license fees, etc. In , the general sales fundraisers raised $ in
net income.

Optional sales fundraisers are not mandatory. All profits are shared with members who fundraise and offset their
children’s expenses at . Optional fundraisers are held each month. The
major optional fund fundraisers are:

Catalog Number 20810W Page 3 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service Schedule number or exhibit
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended
In , the Foundation hosted —_ optional fundraisers and raised $ in net income. Net income only

benefited athletes and members who fundraised. They received a portion of the net income in direct proportion to
the amount their family raised. This amount was credited to the athlete’s individual account at

Individual account sheets were provided once a month and included the athlete’s most recent account balance. See
Exhibit 1.

In her capacity as the Foundation’s president, , has the authority to write checks, signs checks, and make
deposits with only one signature required. The Foundation provided accounting records such as excel
spreadsheets, bank records, check register and sample of invoice statements. During the examination it was
determined fundraiser proceeds were paid to those who participated in each fundraiser.

Any family who raised over $ was issued a Form 1099 for the tax year. encouraged families to
itemize costs incurred at on their personal tax returns against their income on the Form 1099.

The Foundation also solicited sponsorships and provided athletes with sponsorship letters for businesses who
wanted to donate money to a specific athlete’s account at . Expenses not covered by the
fundraisers were the responsibility of the members. According to the Information Packet, members experiencing
financial hardship were encouraged to contact to discuss alternate payment arrangements.

The Foundation does not have a website, but there is a page for . It shares

information regarding upcoming competitions, fundraisers, and details regarding how to enroll in
classes at

Prior Examination
On , the IRS informed the Foundation that its Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1)
Trust Treated as Private Foundation (Form 990-PF) for tax periods ending , and

, had been selected for audit.

The IRS issued Letter 3609 as shown in Exhibit 2 to the Foundation stating the organization would remain

exempt from taxation under IRC Section 501(c)(3). However, “ [who fundraise]
by off-setting the individual account [at ] is inurement and a prohibited transaction.” The IRS
instructed the Foundation to amend its by-laws to prohibit this practice and stated that “

In , the Foundation amended its by-laws.

Current Examination

On , the Foundation filed its Form 990-PF for tax year ending , . The
Foundation reported all income on as contributions, gifts, grants, etc., and all expenses on as
other expenses.?

3 In an attached schedule, all expenses were categorized as competition expenses.
Catalog Number 20810W Page 4 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service Schedule number or exhibit
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended
On , the IRS informed the Foundation that its Form 990-PF for tax period ending
: , had been selected for audit. During the audit, , verbally and in writing, stated that the
Foundation met the requirements of IRC Section 501(c)(3). Moreover, “ ... the

concern [raised by the revenue agent] was providing ... [Forms 1099] for any families that raised over
$ in fundraising money. There was not a concern regarding how the money was used. I do recall ... [the
revenue agent] telling me that any mandatory fundraisers had to include all athletes and they would all benefit
from the proceeds equally. We have followed this guideline.”

The Foundation provided accounting records such as spreadsheets, bank records, check register and
sample of invoice statements. During the examination it was determined fundraiser proceeds were paid to those
who participated in each fundraiser.

Law:

IRC Section 501(a) states that an organization described in IRC Section 501(c)(3) shall be exempt from
taxation unless such exemption is denied under IRC Sections 502 or 503.

IRC Section 501(c)(3) describes organizations organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable,
scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international
amateur sports competition (but only if no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic facilities or
equipment).

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) states that an organization must be both organized and operated
exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in IRC Section 501(c)(3). If an organization fails to
meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(1)(i) states that an organization is organized exclusively for one or more
exempt purposes only if its articles of organization limit the purposes of such organization to one or more
exempt purposes; and do not expressly empower the organization to engage, otherwise than as an insubstantial
part of its activities, in activities which in themselves are not in furtherance of one or more exempt purposes.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(4) provides that an organization is not organized exclusively for one or
more exempt purposes unless its assets are dedicated to an exempt purpose. An organization, however, does not
meet the organizational test if its articles or the law of the State in which it was created provide that its assets
would, upon dissolution, be distributed to its members or shareholders.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) states that an organization will be regarded as operated exclusively for
one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which accomplish one or more exempt
purposes specified in IRC Section 501(c)(3). An organization will not be so regarded if more than an
insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.

Catalog Number 20810W Page 5 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service Schedule number or exhibit
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2) provides that an organization is not operated exclusively for one or
more exempt purposes if its net earnings inure in whole or in part to the benefit of private shareholders or
individuals.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(a)-1(c) defines a private shareholder or individual as persons having a personal and
private interest in the activities of the organization.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(i) provides that an organization may be exempt as organization
described in IRC Section 501(c)(3) if it is operated exclusively for one or more of the following purposes:
religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, educational, or prevention of cruelty to
children or animals.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) provides that an organization is not organized or operated
exclusively for one or more exempt purposes specified in subdivision (1) of this subparagraph unless it serves a
public rather than a private interest. Thus, to meet the requirement of this subdivision, it is necessary for an
organization to establish that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, such as
designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled,
directly or indirectly, by such private interests.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) states that the term charitable is used in IRC Section 501(c)(3) in its
generally accepted legal sense. It also includes the promotion of social welfare by relieving the poor and
distressed or the underprivileged, combating community deterioration, lessening neighborhood tensions, and
eliminating prejudice and discrimination.

In Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. U.S., 326 U.S. 279 (1945), the United States Supreme
Court found that an important, if not the primary, pursuit of the organization was to promote not only an ethical
but also a profitable business community. The organization was not operated exclusively for an educational
purpose under IRC Section 501(c)(3). The United States Supreme Court provided that “the presence of a single
nonexempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance
of truly exempt purposes.”

In P.L.L Scholarship v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 196 (1984), an organization operated bingo games at a bar for
the avowed purpose of raising money for scholarships. The board included the bar owners, the bar’s accountant,
also a director of the bar, as well as others. The court reasoned that, because the bar owners controlled the
organization and appointed the organization's directors, the activities of the organization could be used to the
advantage of the bar owners. The organization claimed that it was independent because there was separate
accounting, and no payments were going to the bar. The court was not persuaded: A realistic look at the
operations of these entities, however, shows that the activities of the taxpayer and the Pastime Lounge
were so interrelated as to be functionally inseparable.” Separate accountings of receipts and disbursements do
not change that fact. The court went on to conclude that because the record indicates that it substantially
benefited private interests, exemption was properly denied.

Catalog Number 20810W Page 6 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service Schedule number or exhibit
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended

In Church by Mail, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-349, aff'd 765 F. 2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1985), the Tax
Court found that a church was operated with a substantial purpose of providing a market for an advertising and
mailing company owned by the same people who controlled the church. The church argued that the contracts
between the were reasonable, but the Court of Appeals pointed out that “the critical inquiry is not whether
particular contractual payments are reasonable or excessive, but instead whether the entire enterprise is carried
on in such a manner that the for-profit organization benefits substantial from the operation of the Church.”

In Wendy Parker Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1986-348, an organization was
formed to aid coma victims, however 30% of funds went to the benefit of Wendy Parker. Significant
contributions were made to the organization by the Parker family, and the Parker family controlled the
organization. Wendy's selection as a substantial recipient of funds substantially benefited the Parker family by
assisting with the economic burden of caring for her. The benefit didn't flow primarily to the public as required
under Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii). Therefore, the Foundation was not exempt under IRC Section
501(c)(3).

In Capital Gymnastics Booster Club v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo -193, the Court analyzed the
fundraising activity of a gymnastic booster club. Members sold items and were awarded points in proportion to
the profit that the family generated. Each point was valued at $10 and used to offset the family's assessed costs
of competition for their children. Parents who did not fundraise did not receive a benefit from the activity and
were responsible for paying the full assessment for their children. The court held that the fundraising structure
allowed assets of the organization to inure to members who control the organization and provided a private
benefit to its member’s children rather than a public benefit.

In Giving Hearts, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C. Memo 2019-94, a non-profit corporation was
not operated exclusively for exempt purposes, and thus it was not entitled to federal income tax-exempt status;
while the corporation was organized for charitable purposes, focusing on funding local children's charities, it
operated a sponsorship program that, by design and effect, permitted for profit businesses to invoke its name as
part of a telemarketing pitch intended, first and foremost, to generate sales leads and revenues, as participating
businesses would be obliged to make a charitable contribution only when a potential customer agreed to an in-
home product demonstration.

Rev. Rul. 69-175, 1969-1 C.B. 149, states that when a group of individuals associate to provide a cooperative
service for themselves, they are serving a private interest. By providing bus transportation for school children,
the organization is enabling the participating parents to fulfill their individual responsibility of transporting
their children to school. Thus, the organization serves a private rather than a public interest. Accordingly, it was
not exempt from federal income tax under IRC Section 501(c)(3).

Rev. Rul. 71-395. 1971-2 C.B. 228, holds that a cooperative art gallery formed and operated by a group of
artists for the purpose of exhibiting and selling their works does not qualify for exemption under IRC Section
501 (c)(3). The IRS concluded that the cooperative gallery served the private purposes of its members, even
though the exhibition and sales of paintings were also educational in some respects.

Catalog Number 20810W Page 7 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service Schedule number or exhibit
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended

Government’s Position:

It is the government’s position that the Foundation does not qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3)
because it fails to meet both the organizational and operational tests, thus the Foundation’s exemption should
be revoked. The Foundation did not address the issues brought to its attention in the prior examination
regarding its individual fundraising practices. The Foundation’s primary activity continues to be to raise funds
to benefit only members and athletes who fundraise and share net income exclusively with athletes, including
on an individual basis, to offset their expenses at . The Foundation’s
primary activity does not accomplish one or more exempt purposes under IRC Section 501(c)(3). This
arrangement results in inurement to its members who fundraised and its organizer and president,

Organizational Test

All nonprofits are not tax-exempt organizations for purposes of IRC Section 501(c)(3). Nonprofit status refers
to incorporation status under state law; tax-exempt status refers to federal income tax exemption under the
Internal Revenue Code. An organization is exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3) if the organization is both
“organized and operated” for one or more exempt purposes such as religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or
to foster national or international amateur sports competition. IRC Section 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. Section
1.501(c)(3)-1(a).

An organization is organized exclusively for one or more exempt purposes if its articles of organization: (1)
limit its purposes to one or more exempt purposes, (2) do not expressly empower it to engage, otherwise than
as an insubstantial part of its activities, in activities which in themselves are not in furtherance of one or more
exempt purposes, and (3) contain an express or implied provision dedicating its assets to an exempt purpose
upon dissolution, Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(1), (4).

The Foundation fails the organizational test. First, the by-laws do not limit the Foundation’s purposes to one or
more exempt purposes. Article II states that the Foundation’s sole purpose is to support

program (i.e., ). Supporting a for-profit business is not a charitable purpose within
the meaning of IRC Section 501(c)(3). See Church by Mail, Inc. v. Commissioner, 765 F. 2d 1387 (9th Cir.
1985), aff'd T.C. Memo, 1984-349 (church was not exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3) because it
substantially benefited a for-profit business owned by the same individuals who controlled the church).

Second, the by-laws expressly empower the Foundation to engage in activities which are not in furtherance of
an exempt purpose. Article II authorizes the Foundation to use its tax-exempt status to raise funds for
members’ children’s tuition and fees. Such activity serves a private rather than a
public interest in violation of IRC Section 501(c)(3). See Wendy L. Parker Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc.,
T.C. Memo 1986-348.

Last, upon dissolution, the Foundation’s assets will be distributed to and used to pay off any
outstanding tuition and fees owed by members. If both the Foundation and are dissolved, all

Catalog Number 20810W Page 8 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service Schedule number or exhibit
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 Year/Period ended
digits)

assets will be donated to a “non-profit organization chosen by the executive board and owner,
.” Because not all nonprofits are exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3), the by-laws fail to expressly or
impliedly dedicate the Foundation’s assets to an exempt purpose.

Operational Test

To qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3), an organization must be both organized and operated
exclusively for purposes as described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1). “Under the operational test,
the purpose towards which an organization's activities are directed, and not the nature of the activities
themselves, is ultimately dispositive of the organization's right to be classified as a Section 501(c)(3)
organization exempt from tax under section 501(a).” Giving Hearts, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2019-
94 (quoting B.S.W. Grp., Inc. v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 352, 356-357 (1978)). The Foundation fails the
operational test because its activities focus primarily on raising funds to offset the costs of its members”
children’s expenses at . These fundraising activities violate IRC
Section 501(c)(3)’s prohibition against private benefit and inurement to “insiders.”

The Foundation’s primary activity is fundraising. Each year, it sponsors types of fundraisers ~ mandatory
sales and optional sales. Mandatory sales are held a year. All profits are used to pay for the

party, end of the year gala, and fees for the maintenance of the Foundation (e.g., accounting and
license fees). All members and athletes are required to participate in the fundraisers.

Optional sales are held each month. Profits are used to offset members’ children’s

expenses at . Members who fundraise are eligible to receive a portion of the profits in direct
proportion to the amount each member's family raises. The Foundation does not pay its members in cash but
forwards their share of the profits to then credits the members’ children’s
individual accounts. Members who do not fundraise do not receive any benefits from the fundraisers and are
responsible for paying their children’s expenses out of their own funds.

A similar fundraising practice was used in Capital Gymnastics Booster Club v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo

-193. Athletes and members of a booster club sold items and were awarded points in proportion to the
profit that the family generated. Each point was valued at $10 and used to offset the family's assessed costs at
Capital Gymnastics National Training Center. Families who did not participate in fundraising did not receive
any of the net income and were responsible for paying their athletes’ full assessment. The court held that this
practice allowed assets of the organization to inure to the members who control the organization in violation of
IRC Section 501(c)(3)’s prohibition against private benefit and inurement. Here, the same legal conclusion
applies to the Foundation’s members.

The inurement proscription applies to persons who because of their relationship with an organization have an
opportunity to control or influence its activities (often referred to as “insiders”). , the Foundation’s
creator and one of its board members, and the members are insiders because of their control over the
Foundation’s activities through participation in and influence over the board of directors, Although the

Catalog Number 20810W Page 9 www.irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule number or exhibit
(May 2017) Explanations of Items
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number (last 4 digits) | Year/Period ended
Foundation did not share its financial resources with and its members directly, the payments
benefited the members by fulfilling, in whole or in part, a financial obligation to the , and by
increasing her revenues. Thus, the Foundation’s assets inured to its members and in violation

IRC Section 501(c)(3)'s prohibition against private inurement. See Church by Mail v. Commissioner, 765 F.2d
1387 (9th Cir. 1985); aff'd T.C. Memo. 1984-349; Capital Gymnastics Booster Club v. Commissioner, T.C.
Memo -193. Accordingly, the Foundation fails the operational test.

Taxpayer’s Position:

The Foundation does not agree with the proposed revocation. contends that the Foundation meets the
requirements of IRC Section 501(c)(3). The only concern raised during a previous audit of the Foundation’s
Form 990-PF for tax periods ending , and , was regarding her failure to
provide Forms 1099 to families who fundraised over $ —. According to , there were no concerns
regarding how the money was used except any mandatory fundraisers had to benefit all athletes equally. Since
the audit, states that the Foundation has followed that guideline.

Government Response to Taxpayer Position:

As explained above, the Foundation did not address the issues brought to its attention in the prior examination

regarding its individual fundraising practices as described in the attached closing letter. See Exhibit 2. The

Foundation’s primary activity continues to be to raise funds and share net income exclusively with athletes at
, including on an individual basis.

Conclusion:

The Foundation fails to meet both the organizational and operational tests of an organization described under
IRC Section 501(c)(3), and therefore is not exempt.

Accordingly, the Foundation’s exempt status is revoked effective , . As such, the Foundation will
be treated as a taxable private foundation as of ; , until such time that the Foundation terminates
its private foundation status under IRC Section 507. Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax should be filed
beginning tax year ending , , and thereafter.

If revocation of tax-exempt status is upheld, the Foundation is required to file Form 990-PF (and related Form
4720) in addition to Form 1120 as it was treated as a for-profit corporation and a taxable private foundation
effectively :

If you agree to this conclusion, please sign the attached Form 6018.

If you disagree, please submit a statement of your position.

Catalog Number 20810W Page 10 Ww. irs.gov Form 886-A (Rev. 5-2017)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.