Private Letter Ruling 202522005 Released May 30, 2025 Approved

Late taxable REIT subsidiary election treated as timely

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A real estate investment trust and its wholly owned subsidiary intended the subsidiary to operate a restaurant as a taxable REIT subsidiary. An internal communication failure left the finance team and outside advisers unaware that the restaurant had opened, so Form 8875 was filed with an effective date that was too late. The taxpayers requested relief to make the election effective before restaurant operations began. The IRS found that they acted reasonably and in good faith and that retroactive relief would not prejudice the government. It treated the filed Form 8875 as timely and effective on the requested earlier date, without ruling on whether either entity otherwise qualified as a REIT or taxable REIT subsidiary.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a REIT and its subsidiary treat a late Form 8875 election as timely and effective before the subsidiary began restaurant operations?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 856(l); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Announcement 2001-17

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202522005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/30/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 856.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------- --------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------ Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- --------------------
--------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------- CC:FIP:01
--------------------------- PLR-118272-24
Date:
March 04, 2025

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Subsidiary = ------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Affiliate = -------------------------------------------

Accounting Firm = ---------------

Law Firm = --------------

Restaurant Services Provider = ------------------------------------------------

Trust = ---------------------------------------------

DRE = ------------------------------------

State = -------------

Date 1 = --------------------------

Date 2 = -----------------------

Date 3 = -------------------------

Date 4 = -------------------------

Date 5 = ------------------

PLR-118272-24 2

Date 6 = ----------------------

Date 7 = -------------------------

Date 8 = -------------------------

Date 9 = ---------------------

Date 10 = ---------------------

Date 11 = -----------------

Date 12 = ------------------

Date 13 = ------------------

Month 1 = ----------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

Dear ---------------------------:

This ruling responds to a letter dated October 2, 2024, submitted on behalf of
Taxpayer and Subsidiary. Taxpayer and Subsidiary request an extension of time under
sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations
(“Regulations”) to jointly make an election under section 856(l) of the Internal Revenue
Code (“Code”) to treat Subsidiary as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) of Taxpayer
effective Date 6.

FACTS

Taxpayer was formed as a limited liability company, under the laws of State.
Taxpayer has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under
sections 856 through 859 of the Code for federal income tax purposes beginning with
Taxpayer’s taxable year ended Date 1.

Subsidiary was formed as a limited liability company, under the laws of State, on
Date 2, and was disregarded from Taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. From

PLR-118272-24 3

inception to Date 5, Subsidiary was directly and wholly owned by Taxpayer. Pursuant
to Subsidiary’s limited liability company operating agreement dated Date 3, Subsidiary
was formed to be a TRS of Taxpayer and to directly or indirectly acquire interests in real
property and provide certain services with respect to real property.

Affiliate is an affiliate of Taxpayer and provides certain administrative services to
Taxpayer, including overseeing tax matters for Taxpayer and Subsidiary. Affiliate does
not have an in-house tax department. Instead, Affiliate’s finance and accounting
department relies on external legal and tax advisors, including Accounting Firm and Law
Firm, for tax planning and tax compliance services. Around the time of Subsidiary’s
formation, Accounting Firm and Law Firm advised Affiliate that Taxpayer and Subsidiary
should jointly make a TRS election for Subsidiary on or before the date Subsidiary
opened a restaurant.

On Date 4, Subsidiary entered into an agreement to lease property from DRE, an
entity wholly owned by Taxpayer and disregarded from Taxpayer for federal income tax
purposes. Also, on Date 4, Taxpayer and Subsidiary entered into an agreement for
Subsidiary to operate a restaurant on the property.

On or around Date 5, Taxpayer granted its entire interest in Subsidiary to the
trustees of Trust to facilitate the acquisition of the restaurant’s liquor license. Trust’s
sole beneficiary is Taxpayer and is disregarded from Taxpayer for federal income tax
purposes. Subsidiary remained disregarded from Taxpayer for federal income tax
purposes. The trustees executed an amended and restated limited liability company
operating agreement dated Date 5 for Subsidiary, which reiterated that Subsidiary was
formed to be a TRS of Taxpayer.

While Taxpayer and Subsidiary initially expected the restaurant to open in Month
1, the expected opening was delayed to early Year 3. On Date 7, Affiliate, in
accordance with its standard operating procedures, engaged Accounting Firm to
prepare a Form 8832, Entity Classification Election, for Subsidiary to elect to be
classified as an association taxable as a corporation. Around this time, and
unbeknownst to Affiliate’s finance and accounting department, Accounting Firm, or Law
Firm, the restaurant began operations. On Date 8, Subsidiary filed Form 8832,
requesting late classification election relief under Rev. Proc. 2009-41, 2009-2 C.B. 439
to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation, effective Date 2.

Due to an internal miscommunication, Affiliate’s finance and accounting
department remained unaware that the restaurant opened until Affiliate received
invoices related to the restaurant on Date 11. Affiliate shortly thereafter informed
Accounting Firm that operations at the restaurant were underway. On Date 12,
Accounting Firm informed Affiliate that a Form 8875, Taxable REIT Subsidiary Election,
needed to be filed because the restaurant began operations. On Date 13, Accounting
Firm prepared, and Taxpayer and Subsidiary filed a Form 8875, effective Date 9.
However, in order for the TRS election to be effective prior to the restaurant beginning

PLR-118272-24 4

operations, the effective date should have been Date 6. Subsequently, Taxpayer filed
this request seeking to treat the Form 8875 filed on Date 13, as having been timely filed
for an effective date of Date 6.

Taxpayer and Subsidiary make the following additional representations in
connection with this request for an extension of time:

1) Taxpayer and Subsidiary are filing this request for relief before the failure to
timely make the regulatory election on Form 8875 was discovered by the
Service.

2) Taxpayer and Subsidiary do not seek to alter a return position for which an
accuracy-related penalty has been or could have been imposed under section
6662 at the time they requested relief, and the new position requires or
permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested.

3) Being fully informed of the required regulatory election and related tax
consequences, Taxpayer and Subsidiary did not choose to not file the
election.

4) Taxpayer and Subsidiary are not using hindsight in requesting relief. No
specific facts have changed since the due date for making the election that
make the election more advantageous to Taxpayer or Subsidiary.

5) Granting the relief requested will not result in Taxpayer or Subsidiary having a
lower U.S. federal tax liability in the aggregate for all years to which the
election applies than they would have had if the election had been timely
made (taking into account the time value of money).

6) The period of limitations on assessment under section 6501(a) has not
expired for Taxpayer or Subsidiary for the taxable year in which the election
should have been filed, nor for any taxable year(s) that would have been
affected by the election had it been timely filed.

In addition, affidavits on behalf of Taxpayer and Subsidiary have been provided
as required by sections 301.9100-3(e)(2) and (3).

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 856(l) provides that a REIT and a corporation (other than a REIT) may
jointly elect to treat such corporation as a TRS. To be eligible for treatment as a TRS,
section 856(l)(1) provides that the REIT must directly or indirectly own stock in such
corporation, and the REIT and such corporation must jointly elect such treatment. The
election is irrevocable once made, unless both the REIT and the corporation consent to

PLR-118272-24 5

its revocation. In addition, section 856(l) specifically provides that the election, and any
revocation thereof, may be made without the consent of the Secretary.

In Announcement 2001-17, 2001-1 C.B. 716, the Service announced the
availability of new Form 8875, Taxable REIT Subsidiary Election. According to the
Announcement, this form is to be used for taxable years beginning after 2000 for eligible
entities to elect treatment as a TRS. The instructions to Form 8875 provide that the
subsidiary and the REIT can make the election at any time during the taxable year.
However, the effective date of the election depends on when the Form 8875 is filed.
The instructions further provide that the effective date cannot be more than 2 months
and 15 days prior to the date of filing the election, or more than 12 months after the date
of filing the election. If no date is specified on the form, the election is effective on the
date the form is filed with the Service.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but
no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all
subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a
regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by regulations or by a
revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin.

Section 301.9100-3(a) through (c)(1) sets forth rules that the Service generally
will use to determine whether, under the particular facts and circumstances of each
situation, the Commissioner will grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that
do not meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides
that requests for relief subject to section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer
provides evidence (including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)) to establish
to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b) provides that a taxpayer generally is deemed to have
acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer (i) requests relief under section
301.9100-3 before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the
Service; (ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the
taxpayer’s control; (iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable
diligence (taking into account the taxpayer’s experience and the complexity of the return
or issue), the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv) reasonably
relied on the written advice of the Service; or (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. A taxpayer
will be deemed to have not acted reasonably and in good faith, however, if the taxpayer
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or
could be imposed under section 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief and the
new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested; (ii)

PLR-118272-24 6

was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax
consequences, but chose not to file the election; or (iii) uses hindsight in requesting
relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that a reasonable extension of time to make a
regulatory election will be granted only when the interests of the Government will not be
prejudiced by the granting of relief. Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the
interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer
having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election
than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into
account the time value of money). Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the
interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the
regulatory election should have been made or any taxable years that would have been
affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of limitations
on assessment under section 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting
relief under section 301.9100-3.

CONCLUSION

Based on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that Taxpayer and Subsidiary have satisfied the requirements for granting a reasonable
extension of time to elect under section 856(l) to treat Subsidiary as a TRS of Taxpayer,
effective Date 6. Accordingly, the Form 8875 filed by Taxpayer and Subsidiary to treat
Subsidiary as a TRS of Taxpayer will be treated as timely filed and effective as of Date
6.

This ruling is limited to the timeliness of the filing of Form 8875. This ruling’s
application is limited to the facts, representations, Code sections, and regulation
sections cited herein. Except as provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. No opinion is expressed as to whether Taxpayer otherwise
qualifies as a REIT or whether Subsidiary otherwise qualifies as a TRS under
subchapter M of chapter 1 of the Code. Additionally, no opinion is expressed as to any
tax liability of Subsidiary.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information submitted and
representations made by Taxpayer and Subsidiary and accompanied by penalties of
perjury statements executed by the appropriate parties. While this office has not
verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling, it is subject
to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-118272-24 7

In accordance with the terms of a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of
this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                                  Sincerely,

                                                  ______________________________
                                                  Vanessa Mekpong
                                                  Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 1
                                                  Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                                  (Financial Institutions & Products)

cc: ----------------------------------
-----------------------------
------------------------------
---------------------------

 --------------------
 ---------------
 ------------------------------------------
 -------------------------------
 ---------------------------

 --------------------
 ---------------
 -----------------------
 ----------------------------
 ---------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.