Private Letter Ruling 202520014 Released May 16, 2025 Approved Transcribed from scan

Pre-2018 Roth IRA contributions may be recharacterized

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A financial institution removed the word “Roth” from an IRA's displayed account title while processing the taxpayer's name change, although the account remained coded internally as a Roth IRA. Unaware of the account type, the taxpayer made a 2010 contribution and trustee-to-trustee rollovers in 2012 and 2014. After discovering the error, the taxpayer asked to recharacterize those pre-2018 amounts as traditional IRA contributions without amending closed-year returns or claiming deductions. The IRS found that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not reduce aggregate tax liability. It granted 60 days to complete the recharacterization, including transferring all net income attributable to the contributions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer recharacterize pre-2018 Roth IRA contributions and rollovers as traditional IRA contributions after the normal deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to complete the trustee-to-trustee transfer
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408A(d)(6); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.408A-5 and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, DC 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
Division

February 21, 2025

Release Number: 202520014
Release Date: 5/16/2025

URL No. 9100.00.00

Legend:

Taxpayer A =
Roth IRA X =

Custodian C =

Amount 1 =

Amount 2 =
Amount 3 =

Amount 4 =

Amount 5 =

Amount 6 =

Amount 7 =

Dear

This is in response to your letter dated December 27, 2023, submitted on your behalf
by your authorized representative, in which you request a ruling to recharacterize a

pre-2018 contribution and pre-2018 rollover contributions under section 301.9100-3

of the Procedure and Administration Regulations (the “Regulations”).

2

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of your request.

Taxpayer A established Roth IRA X with Financial Institution B in 2000. Custodian C
serves as custodian of Roth IRA X. Taxpayer A made contributions to Roth IRA X for
tax years prior to 2010. The contribution/rollovers involved in your ruling request involve
a contribution of Amount 1 for tax year 2010, a trustee-to- trustee rollover of Amounts 2
and 3 for tax year 2012, and a trustee-to-trustee rollover of Amounts 4, 5, and 6 for tax
year 2014. (which total Amount 7).

Following Taxpayer A’s marriage in 2007, she requested that Financial Institution B
change the last name on Roth IRA X to reflect her last name change. Financial
Institution B submitted the request to Custodian C who, in processing the request
inadvertently removed the reference “Roth” from the account title. However, the account
remained coded as a Roth IRA within the product code.

Taxpayer A was unaware that Roth IRA X was a Roth IRA (rather than a traditional IRA)
because when accessing her account in Financial Institution B’s customer account
portal, the account was not labeled “Roth”. During a meeting in 2021 with Financial
Institution B, Taxpayer discovered the mislabeling of Roth IRA X on Financial Institution
B’s customer account portal.

Taxpayer A represents that she timely filed federal income tax returns for tax years
2010, 2012 and 2014. Taxpayer A is not seeking relief to file amended tax returns for
these tax years nor seeking to recharacterize the Roth IRA X contributions as
deductible traditional IRA contributions. Taxpayer A also represents that this request
was filed before the Internal Revenue Service (the Service) discovered the failure to
make an election to recharacterize her Roth IRA X contributions The contributions
made for years 2010, 2012 and 2014 and the net earnings on these contributions
have been retained in Roth IRA X.

Based on the facts and representations submitted, Taxpayer A requests an extension
of time to recharacterize the Roth IRA contribution made to Roth IRA X for tax year
2010, and the rollover contributions made to Roth IRA X for tax years 2012 and 2014,
which total Amount 7, as having been made to a traditional IRA pursuant to section
1.408A-5 of the Federal Income Tax Regulations (the “I.T.” Regulations) and section
301.9100-3 of the Regulations.

3

With respect to your ruling request, section 408A(d)(6)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code
(the “Code”) provides that except as provided by the Secretary, if, on or before the due
date for any taxable year, a taxpayer transfers in a trustee-to-trustee transfer any
contribution to an individual retirement plan made during such taxable year from such
plan to another individual retirement plan, then for purposes of this chapter, such
contribution shall be treated as having been made to the transferee plan (and not the
transferor plan)..

Section 408A(d)(6)(B)(i) of the Code provides that subparagraph A shall not apply to the
transfer of any contribution unless such transfer is accompanied by the net income
allocable to such contribution.

Section 408A(d)(7) of the Code defines the due date. for purposes of this subsection, to
mean the due date prescribed by law (including extensions of time) for filing the
taxpayer's return for such taxable year.

Section 1.408A-5, Q&A-1 of the I.T. Regulations provides that, except as otherwise
provided by the Secretary, a taxpayer may elect to recharacterize an IRA contribution
made to one type of IRA as having originally been made to another type of IRA by
making a trustee-to-trustee transfer of the IRA contribution to the other type of IRA.
In a recharacterization, the IRA contribution is treated as having been made to the
transferee IRA and not the transferor IRA. This section, further provides that this
recharacterization election generally must occur on or before the date prescribed by
law, including extensions, for filing the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the tax
year of the contribution.

Section 1.408A-5, Q&A-2 of the I.T. Regulations requires that the net income
attributable to the amount of a contribution being recharacterized must be transferred to
the other type of IRA along with the contribution.

Section 1.408A-5, Q&A-6 of the I.T. Regulations describes how a taxpayer makes the
election to recharacterize the IRA contribution. To recharacterize a Roth IRA
contribution (1) the taxpayer must notify the Roth IRA trustee that the taxpayer has
elected to recharacterize the contribution, (2) the taxpayer must provide the trustee (and
the transferee trustee, if different from the transferor trustee) with specified information
that is sufficient to effect the recharacterization, and (3) the trustee must transfer the
contribution and the net income allocable to the contribution.

Sections 301-9100-1, 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 of the Regulations provide guidance
concerning requests for relief submitted to the Service on or after December 31, 1997.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in his
discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of the time fixed by a regulation, a
revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an announcement published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin for the making of an election or application for relief in respect
of tax under, among others, Subtitle A of the Code.

4

Section 301.9100-2 of the Regulations lists certain elections for which automatic
extensions of time to file are granted. Section 301.9100-3 generally provides guidance
with respect to the granting of relief with respect to those elections not referenced in
section 301.9100-2. The relief requested in this case is not referenced in section
301.9100-2.

Section 301.9100-3 of the Regulations provides that applications for relief that fall within
section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides sufficient evidence
(including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)) to establish that (1) the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and (2) the grant of relief would not
prejudice the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the Regulations provides that a taxpayer will be deemed to
have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer (i) requests relief under section
301.9100-3 before the failure to make a timely election is discovered by the Service, (ii)
inadvertently failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the
taxpayer's control, (iii) failed to make the election because after exercising reasonable
diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv) reasonably
relied upon the written advice of the Service, or (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make the election.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) of the Regulations provides that the interests of the
Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower
tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the
taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the
time value of money).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the Regulations provides that ordinarily the interests of
the Government will be treated as prejudiced if the tax years that would have been
affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the statute of limitations
before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.

In this case, Taxpayer A requested relief before the failure to make a timely election to
recharacterize her Roth IRA contributions was discovered by the Service. Thus,
Taxpayer A is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith because she
satisfies the requirements of section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(ii) of the Regulations.

In addition, Taxpayer A is not seeking relief to file amended returns for closed years and
granting relief will not result in Taxpayer A having a lower tax liability in the aggregate
for all taxable years affected by the election than she would have had if the election had
been timely made. Thus, we find that, under section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) of the
Regulations, granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

5

With respect to Taxpayer A’s ruling request, we rule that, pursuant to section 301.9100-
3 of the Regulations, Taxpayer A is granted a period not to exceed 60 days from the
date of this letter to recharacterize the contributions to Roth IRA X for tax years 2010,
2012 and 2014, which total Amount 7, as contributions to a traditional IRA. The
recharacterization must otherwise satisfy applicable rules, including that the net income
attributable to the contributions must be transferred to the traditional IRA.

This letter is directed to the taxpayer who requested it. Code section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. A copy of this letter has been
sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney on file
with this office.

If you wish to inquire about this letter, please contact

Sincerely,

Frederick L. Parker, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.