Corporation receives extra time for a foreign tax redetermination election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A domestic corporation had five foreign tax redeterminations involving two wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. It chose an election under Treas. Reg. § 1.905-5(e)(1) that would account for those changes in the subsidiaries' last pre-2018 pooling year. Its accounting firm explained the need for an amended return for that earlier year but did not explain that the corporation also had to attach an election statement to its original return for the year of the redeterminations. The corporation filed the amended return but omitted the required statement and sought relief after the accounting firm discovered the omission. The IRS concluded that the requirements for § 301.9100 relief were satisfied and granted 120 days to attach the statement to an amended return. The ruling did not determine whether the corporation otherwise qualified to make the election.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the corporation receive extra time to file the statement required for its § 1.905-5(e)(1) foreign tax redetermination election?
- Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file the statement on an amended return.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 901, 902, 905(c); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.905-3, 1.905-5, 1.964-1, 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202518006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/2/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 905.03-02
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------- -----------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------------------------ CC:INTL:B03
---------------------------------- PLR-113240-24
Date:
January 21, 2025
LEGEND
Taxpayer = ----------------
Sub 1 = ---------------
Sub 2 = --------------------------------------------
Name 1 = -----------------------------------------
Name 2 = ------------------------------------
Accounting Firm = ----------------------
Date 1 = ------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------------
Date 5 = ---------------------------
Date 6 = ---------------------------
Date 7 = ---------------------------
Date 8 = ---------------------------
Date 9 = -----------------------
Date 10 = ---------------------------
Date 11 = ---------------------
Date 12 = ----------------
Day = -------------------
Month = -----------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
Year 5 = -------
State = -------------
Country 1 = ------------
Country 2 = ----------------
PLR-113240-24 2
Country 3 = ----------------
Country 4 = --------
Country 5 = ------------
Country 6 = ---------
Currency 1 = ------
Currency 2 = ------
Amount 1 = --------
Amount 2 = -------------
Amount 3 = ---------
Amount 4 = -------------
Amount 5 = -------
Dear -------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated Date 1, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer by its
authorized representatives (the “Ruling Request”), requesting an extension of time
under §301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations for Taxpayer to file
an election under §1.905-5(e)(1) with respect to certain foreign tax redeterminations (as
defined in §1.905-3(a)) that occurred in Taxpayer’s taxable year ended Date 2.
FACTS
Taxpayer is a corporation formed under the laws of State. Taxpayer is an accrual
method taxpayer with a taxable year ending on Day.
As of Date 3, Taxpayer owned 100 percent of the stock of Sub 1, a Country 1 entity
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes, and 100 percent of the stock of
Sub 2, a Country 2 entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes. At all
relevant times, Sub 1 and Sub 2 also had taxable years ending on Day.
Effective Date 9, Sub 1 changed its place of organization to Country 3 and changed its
name to Name 1. Effective Date 10, Sub 2 changed its place of organization to Country
3 and changed its name to Name 2. Consistent with the Ruling Request, this letter will
continue to refer to Name 1 and Name 2 as Sub 1 and Sub 2, respectively.
As relevant for purposes of this letter, Sub 1 had, for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
three foreign tax redeterminations (as defined in §1.905-3(a)) that occurred in its taxable
year ended Date 2: (i) an additional assessment of Currency 1 Amount 1 of Country 4
tax, relating to its taxable years ended Date 4 through Date 5; (ii) a refund of Currency 1
Amount 2 of Country 5 tax, relating to either its taxable year ended Date 6 or its taxable
PLR-113240-24 3
year ended Date 7;1 and (iii) an additional assessment of Currency 1 Amount 3 of
Country 5 tax, relating to certain of its taxable years ended Date 8 through Date 3.2
As relevant for purposes of this letter, Sub 2 had, for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
two foreign tax redeterminations (as defined in §1.905-3(a)) that occurred in its taxable
year ended Date 2: (i) an additional assessment of Currency 2 Amount 4 of Country 6
tax, relating to its taxable year ended Date 7, and (ii) an additional assessment of
Currency 1 Amount 5 of Country 4 tax, relating to its taxable years ended Date 4
through Date 5.
For purposes of this letter, Taxpayer, Sub 1, and Sub 2’s taxable year ended Date 2 will
be referred to as “FYXX,” and the five foreign tax redeterminations mentioned above will
be referred to as the “FYXX FTRs.”
At all relevant times for purposes of this letter, Taxpayer employed Accounting Firm as
an advisor regarding its U.S. federal income tax obligations. In calendar year Year 4,
Accounting Firm assisted Taxpayer in determining the potential impact of making an
election under §1.905-5(e)(1) with respect to the FYXX FTRs. During this time,
Accounting Firm explained to Taxpayer that, if it decided to make an election under
§1.905-5(e)(1) with respect to the FYXX FTRs, then Taxpayer was required (pursuant to
§1.905-5(e)(2)(i)(C)) to file an amended U.S. federal income tax return for its taxable
year ended Date 3, reflecting the FYXX FTRs.
During this time, Accounting Firm did not explain to Taxpayer that, if it decided to make
an election under §1.905-5(e)(1) with respect to the FYXX FTRs, then Taxpayer was
also required (pursuant to §1.905-5(e)(2)(i)(A)) to file a statement with its original U.S.
federal income tax return for FYXX. For purposes of this letter, the statement required
by §1.905-5(e)(2)(i)(A) to be included with Taxpayer’s original U.S. federal income tax
return for FYXX, relating to an election under §1.905-5(e)(1) with respect to the FYXX
FTRs, will be referred to as the “Taxpayer FYXX Statement.”
Taxpayer ultimately decided to make an election under §1.905-5(e)(1) with respect to
the FYXX FTRs. Taxpayer filed an amended U.S. federal income tax return for its
taxable year ended Date 3, reflecting the FYXX FTRs, on Date 12.
During calendar years Year 4 and Year 5, Accounting Firm was also engaged to assist
Taxpayer with the preparation of its U.S. federal income tax return for FYXX. During this
engagement, Accounting Firm did not explain to Taxpayer that Taxpayer was required
to file the Taxpayer FYXX Statement. In addition, Taxpayer was not aware of this
1 The Ruling Request appears to state that the transaction to which the refund relates occurred in
calendar year Year 1, but it does not specify whether this transaction occurred in Sub 1’s taxable year
ended Date 6 or in its taxable year ended Date 7 (which began on Date 11).
2 The Ruling Request appears to state that the additional taxes relate to payments made in calendar
years Year 2 through Year 3, but it does not specify the taxable years (ended Day) overlapping such
calendar years in which such payments were made.
PLR-113240-24 4
requirement in the course of preparing its U.S. federal income tax return for FYXX.
Consequently, Taxpayer’s original U.S. federal income tax return for FYXX, which was
also filed on Date 12, did not include the Taxpayer FYXX Statement.
In Month Year 5, Accounting Firm inquired as to whether Taxpayer had filed the
Taxpayer FYXX Statement. This was the first time that Taxpayer was made aware of
the requirement to file the Taxpayer FYXX Statement. Taxpayer subsequently
submitted the Ruling Request, requesting an extension of time under §301.9100-3 to file
the Taxpayer FYXX Statement.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Sections 901(a) and (b)(1) provide, in relevant part, that a domestic corporation may
elect to claim foreign tax credits for the amount of any income taxes paid or accrued to
any foreign country during the taxable year.
Section 902(a), as in effect prior to the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017,
P.L. 115-97 (the “TCJA”), generally provided that if a domestic corporation owned 10
percent or more of the voting stock of a foreign corporation and received a dividend
from such foreign corporation, then for purposes of the foreign tax credit the domestic
corporation was deemed to have paid foreign income taxes in an amount equal to the
foreign corporation’s post-1986 foreign income taxes multiplied by a fraction, the
numerator of which was the amount of the dividend and the denominator of which was
the foreign corporation’s post-1986 undistributed earnings.
Section 902(c)(1), as in effect prior to the passage of the TCJA, provided that a foreign
corporation’s post-1986 undistributed earnings consisted of the earnings and profits of
the foreign corporation accumulated in taxable years beginning after December 31,
1986, as of the close of the taxable year of the foreign corporation in which the dividend
(referred to in section 902(a)) is distributed, and without diminution by reason of
dividends distributed during such taxable year.
Section 902(c)(2), as in effect prior to the passage of the TCJA, provided that a foreign
corporation’s post-1986 foreign income taxes consisted of the sum of the foreign
income taxes with respect to the taxable year of the foreign corporation in which the
dividend (referred to in section 902(a)) is distributed, and the foreign income taxes with
respect to prior taxable years of the foreign corporation beginning after December 31,
1986, to the extent that such foreign income taxes are not attributable (pursuant to
section 902(a)) to dividends distributed by the foreign corporation in prior taxable years.
Section 902 was repealed by the TCJA, effective for taxable years of foreign
corporations beginning after December 31, 2017.
Section 905(c)(1) provides that if accrued foreign income taxes when paid differ from
the amounts claimed as foreign tax credits by the taxpayer, accrued foreign income
PLR-113240-24 5
taxes are not paid before the date two years after the close of the taxable year to which
such taxes relate, or any foreign income tax paid is refunded in whole or in part, then
the taxpayer shall notify the Secretary, who shall determine the amount of the tax for the
year or years affected.
Section 1.905-3(a) generally defines a “foreign tax redetermination” as a change in
liability for foreign income taxes that may affect a taxpayer’s U.S. tax liability.
Section 1.905-5(a)(1) generally provides that, except as provided in §1.905-5(e), a
foreign tax redetermination of a foreign corporation that relates to a taxable year of the
foreign corporation beginning before January 1, 2018, must be accounted for by
adjusting the foreign corporation’s earnings and profits, post-1986 undistributed
earnings, and post-1986 foreign income taxes for the taxable year of the foreign
corporation to which the foreign taxes relate.
Section 1.905-5(a)(2) generally provides that, except as provided in §1.905-5(e), if a
foreign tax redetermination occurs (and is accounted for pursuant to §1.905-5(a)(1)),
then a redetermination of U.S. tax liability is required to account for the effect of the
foreign tax redetermination on the tax liability of a United States shareholder of the
foreign corporation in the year to which the redetermined foreign taxes relate and in any
subsequent taxable year up to and including the year in which the foreign tax
redetermination occurs.
Section 1.905-5(e)(1) generally provides that, if a foreign tax redetermination of a
foreign corporation occurs in a taxable year of the foreign corporation that ends with or
within a taxable year of a United States shareholder of the foreign corporation ending on
or after November 2, 2020, and if such foreign tax redetermination relates to a taxable
year of the foreign corporation beginning before January 1, 2018, then an election can
be made to treat such foreign tax redetermination as if it had occurred in the foreign
corporation’s last taxable year beginning before January 1, 2018 (the “last pooling
year”). If an election under §1.905-5(e)(1) is made, then the foreign tax redetermination
is accounted for by adjusting the foreign corporation’s post-1986 undistributed earnings
and post-1986 foreign income taxes in the last pooling year, rather than in the year to
which the redetermined foreign tax relates.
Section 1.905-5(e)(2)(i) generally provides that the election under §1.905-5(e)(1) is
made by the controlling domestic shareholders (as defined in §1.964-1(c)(5)) of the
foreign corporation. Section 1.905-5(e)(2)(i) also provides certain rules for making an
election under §1.905-5(e)(1).
Section 1.905-5(e)(2)(i)(A) generally provides that each controlling domestic
shareholder must file the statement required under §1.964-1(c)(3)(ii) with its timely filed
original income tax return for such shareholder’s taxable year in which or with which
ends the taxable year of the foreign corporation in which a foreign tax redetermination
occurs.
PLR-113240-24 6
Section 1.964-1(c)(3)(ii) generally provides that a statement required pursuant to such
section must set forth certain identifying information of the foreign corporation and each
controlling domestic shareholder and a description of the action taken on behalf of the
foreign corporation.
Section 1.905-5(e)(2)(i)(C) generally provides that each controlling domestic
shareholder must file an amended return for its taxable year with or within which ends
the foreign corporation’s last pooling year, and if applicable must file an amended return
for each other affected taxable year, reflecting a redetermination of the controlling
domestic shareholder’s U.S. tax liability for such year(s) on account of the foreign tax
redetermination.
Section 1.905-5(e)(2)(iii) provides that an election under §1.905-5(e)(1) is valid only if all
the requirements in §1.905-5(e)(2)(i) are satisfied by each of the controlling domestic
shareholders.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides, in relevant part, that the Commissioner may grant a
reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as an election whose due
date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register or a revenue ruling,
revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections.
Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of §301.9100-2. It provides that these
requests for relief are granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including
affidavits) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted
reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that, except as provided in §301.9100-3(b)(3), a
taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer
reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional and the tax professional failed to make,
or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(2) provides that a taxpayer will not be considered to have
reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have
known that the professional was not competent to render advice on the regulatory
election or was not aware of all relevant facts.
PLR-113240-24 7
Section 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have not acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer (i) seeks to alter a return position for which
an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the
time the taxpayer requests relief, and the new position requires or permits the regulatory
election for which relief is requested; (ii) was informed in all material respects of the
required election and related tax consequences, but chose not to file the election; or (iii)
uses hindsight in requesting relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if
the granting of relief would result in the taxpayer (and other affected taxpayers, if
applicable) having lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the
election than the taxpayer(s) would have had if the election had been timely made.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(2) provides that the interests of the Government are ordinarily
prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made,
or any taxable years that would have been affected by the election had it been timely
made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under section 6501(a)
before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under §301.9100-3.
Section 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for making an
election is not a determination that a taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election
or that a taxpayer has complied with the other requirements for a valid election.
CONCLUSION
Based on the facts provided, we conclude that the requirements of sections 301.9100-1
and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Taxpayer is hereby granted an extension of time of
one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of this letter to file the statement required
by §1.905-5(e)(2)(i)(A) to be included with Taxpayer’s original U.S. federal income tax
return for FYXX, relating to an election under §1.905-5(e)(1) with respect to the FYXX
FTRs (i.e., a Taxpayer FYXX Statement). Taxpayer should file the statement by
attaching it to a duly filed amended return for FYXX.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information submitted by the taxpayer
and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party.
While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request
for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-113240-24 8
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
/s/ Le Chen
Le Chen
Attorney, Branch 3
Associate Chief Counsel (International)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.