Partnership receives 120 days to make a late section 754 election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A partnership failed to file a section 754 election for the tax year in which one of its partners died. That election allows partnership property basis adjustments following certain distributions or transfers of partnership interests. The IRS concluded that the partnership met the standards for discretionary deadline relief and gave it 120 days to make the election. The relief requires the partnership and its partners to make the basis adjustments that would have applied if the election had been timely, even for years whose limitation periods have expired. If an administrative adjustment request is needed, the partnership must also comply with section 6227(b).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the partnership make a late section 754 election for the year in which a partner died?
- Outcome: Approved. The partnership has 120 days from the letter date to make the election, subject to retroactive basis-adjustment conditions.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 734(b), 743(b), 754, 6227(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202516003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/18/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 754.00-00, 9100.00-00,
9100.15-00 Person To Contact:
--------------------, ID No. -----------------
-------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------
-------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------ CC:PT&E:B01
--------------------------------- PLR-113163-24
----------------------------- Date:
January 17, 2025
LEGEND
X = ----------------------------------
-----------------------
State = -------------
Date 1 = ------------------
Date 2 = ------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
Year = -------
Dear ----------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated June 18, 2024, and subsequent correspondence,
submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting an extension of
time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an
election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
FACTS
According to the information submitted, X was formed as a limited liability company
under the laws of State on Date 1 and is properly treated as a partnership for federal tax
purposes. On Date 2, a partner in X died. X inadvertently failed to file a § 754 election
for its taxable year ended Date 3.
PLR-113163-24 2
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property is adjusted, in
the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734 and, in the case of
a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such an election
shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all
transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which the
election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.
Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754
to adjust basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a
distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, must be
made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during
which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be
filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including extensions) for
filing the return for such taxable year.
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to
make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except
in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term
regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation
published in the Federal Register or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section
301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for regulatory elections that
do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides
evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X
is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make a § 754
election for its taxable year ended Date 3 and thereafter. The election should be made
in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center with X’s Year tax return.
A copy of this letter should be attached to the relevant filing.
PLR-113163-24 3
This ruling is contingent on X’s relevant filing(s) containing adjustments to the basis of
X’s properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been
made if the § 754 election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect
any additional deductions for recovery of basis related to X’s property that would have
been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether the
statutory period of limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for
any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any deductions for recovery of basis
allowable for an open year are to be computed based on the remaining useful life or
recovery period and using property basis adjusted by the greater of such deductions
allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely made.
If X is required to file an AAR in order to properly amend a partnership return, then this
ruling is contingent on X filing Form 1065-X or Form 8082 and taking into account the
adjustments as required by § 6227(b).
Additionally, the partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to reflect what
the basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether
the statutory period for limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired
for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of X must
reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional deductions for the
recovery of basis related to X’s property that would have been allowable if the § 754
election had been timely made.
Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
federal income tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of
the Code. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of
time for making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible
to make the election.
Further, we express or imply no opinion concerning the assessment of any interest,
additions to tax, additional amounts, or penalties for failure to file a timely income tax or
information return with respect to any taxable year that may be affected by this ruling.
For example, we express or imply no opinion as to whether a taxpayer is entitled to
relief from any penalty on the basis that the taxpayer had reasonable cause for failure to
file timely any income tax or information returns.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations made
by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-113163-24 4
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey A. Erickson
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates)
By:___________/s/_______________
Caroline E. Hay
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates)
Enclosure:
Copy of letter for § 6110 purposes
cc: ----------------------------
--------------------
-------------------------------
---------------------------
----------------------------------------------
------------------------------
-------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.