Debtors’ liquidation plan received another extension while assets and disputed claims are resolved

Number
202515007
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Income From Discharge of Indebtedness; Year Liquidation Occurs; Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards and Built-in Losses Following Ownership Changes; Discharge of Indebtedness
Code sections
§ 61, § 108, § 331, § 382, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 13, 2025
Publicly released
April 11, 2025

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer group sought a second supplemental ruling concerning an existing plan to liquidate debtors. It represented that it had continuously pursued liquidation as quickly as commercially reasonable but could not finish disposing of remaining assets and resolving disputed claims within the previously approved period. Debtors that had distributed all assets had already recognized their cancellation-of-debt income, and the group had accounted for that income and related attribute reduction. The IRS ruled that the new facts would not disturb the initial ruling and that the plan would continue to be respected as a liquidation plan for an additional redacted number of years. The extension depends on the earlier representations remaining effective and on continued compliance with the plan and plan trust. The ruling does not address tax issues outside the prior rulings, including other effects of the plan or applicable net operating loss carryforward periods.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the debtors’ plan continue to be treated as a plan of liquidation for an additional period?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: Prior private letter rulings; IRC § 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202515007
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/11/2025
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 61.22-00, 108.00-00, 331.04-
00, 382.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------
Telephone Number:
-----------------------------
--------------------
------------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------------- CC:CORP:BO3
-------------------------------
PLR-113230-24
Date:
January 13, 2025

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------

Date A = -------------------
Date B = -------------------
(j) =

Dear ----------------:

This letter (the “Second Supplemental PLR”) responds to your authorized representative's July 18, 2024, request that we supplement our letter rulings dated Date A (the “Initial PLR”) and Date B (the “Supplemental PLR”). Capitalized terms not defined in this ruling have the meanings assigned to them in the Initial PLR.

Supplemental Representations

(a) At all times since the issuance of the Initial PLR, Taxpayer has acted with the primary purpose of liquidating the Debtors in a commercially reasonable manner as quickly as possible under the facts and circumstances.
(b) It is not possible to liquidate the Debtors remaining assets and resolve their disputed claims in a commercially reasonable manner within the liquidation period contemplated in the Supplemental PLR.
PLR-113230-24
2

(c) The primary purpose of the requested extension is to continue the liquidation of the Debtors in a commercially reasonable manner as quickly as possible under the facts and circumstances.
(d) Each Debtor that has distributed all of its assets pursuant to the Plan has realized any COD income, and the Taxpayer Group has taken such COD income and any corresponding attribute reduction into account for federal income tax purposes.

Supplemental Rulings

Based on the information submitted and representations made in the Initial PLR, the Supplemental PLR, and this Second Supplemental PLR, we rule as follows:

(1) The facts and representations in the Second Supplemental PLR will not adversely affect the Initial PLR, which will remain in full force and effect.
(2) The Plan will continue to be respected as a plan of liquidation for an additional period of (j) years beyond the period contemplated in the Supplemental PLR.

Limitations and Caveats

The foregoing rulings are based on the following: (1) all representations in the Initial PLR and Supplemental PLR, except as modified by the Second Supplemental PLR, remain in full force and effect; and (2) the Taxpayer adheres to all terms and conditions of the Plan, including the Plan Trust, and the Plan remains in effect. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling, it is subject to verification upon examination.

No opinion is expressed under the provisions of any other section of the Code or regulations that are not specifically covered by the above rulings, including the tax treatment of the Plan or any effects resulting from the Plan under other provisions of the Code or regulations or the applicability of the relevant net operating loss carryforward periods.

Procedural Statements

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer Group requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are being sent to your authorized representatives.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
PLR-113230-24
3

requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number (PLR-113230-24) of this letter ruling.

Sincerely,

_________
Mark J. Weiss
Branch Chief, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc: ------------------------
---------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
----------------------------

-----------------------
---------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
----------------------------

----------------------
------------------------
------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace