Private Letter Ruling 202503005 Released January 17, 2025 Approved

9100 relief treating a late Form 8996 as timely to self-certify a partnership as a Qualified Opportunity Fund

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

This letter grants a late-filing extension for an Opportunity Zone election. To become a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF), an entity must self-certify by filing Form 8996 with a timely tax return. Here, an LLC taxed as a partnership intended from the start to be a QOF and relied on its tax advisors, but two accounting firms each believed the other was engaged to prepare and file the partnership's return, so the initial return and Form 8996 were never filed on time. Once the mix-up was discovered, the taxpayer had the return and Form 8996 filed and sought relief. Because the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make the election, was not using hindsight, and the relief would not lower its aggregate tax, the IRS found it acted reasonably and in good faith. It treated the late Form 8996 as timely, so the partnership is treated as having self-certified as a QOF for the year in question.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership get an extension of time so that its late Form 8996 is treated as timely for self-certifying as a Qualified Opportunity Fund under IRC § 1400Z-2?
  • Outcome: approved (late Form 8996 treated as timely)
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, -3; IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i)

Full text (IRS public release)

 Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                                Washington, DC 20224

 Number: 202503005                                              Third Party Communication: None
 Release Date: 1/17/2025                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
 Index Number: 9100.00-00
                                                                Person To Contact:
                                                                -------------------------------
                                                                ID No. -----------------
                                                                Telephone Number:
 --------------------                                           --------------------
 ----------------------------                                   Refer Reply To:
 ---------------------------------                              CC:ITA:B05
                                                                PLR-108210-24
                                                                Date:
                                                                October 21, 2024




Legend:
 Taxpayer                            =   ----------------------------------------------
 Date 1                              =   ---------------------
 Date 2                              =   ---------------------
 Date 3                              =   --------------------------
 Date 4                              =   -------------
 Date 5                              =   ------------------
 State 1                             =   -------------
 State 2                             =   ---------
 Manager                             =   --------------------------
 Party                               =   ------------------------------
 Accounting Firm 1                   =   ---------------------------------------
 Partner                             =   -------------------
 Accounting Firm 2                   =   --------------------------------
 Law Firm 1                          =   -------------------------
 Law Firm 2                          =   ----------------------------------------
 Year 1                              =   -------
 Year 2                              =   -------
 Year 3                              =   -------


Dear --------------------:

This letter ruling responds to Taxpayer’s request dated Date 1 for an extension of time
under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations
to file a Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund. Specifically, Taxpayer requests that
the Internal Revenue Service (Service) grant an extension of time to make an election
under section 1400Z-2 of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the
Income Tax Regulations to self-certify as a qualified opportunity fund (QOF) effective as
of Date 2.
PLR-108210-24                                2


                                          FACTS

Taxpayer represents the facts as follows:

Taxpayer is a limited liability company organized under the laws of State 1 on Date 3.
Taxpayer has a calendar year annual accounting period and Taxpayer’s overall method
of accounting is the accrual method of accounting. Taxpayer is a partnership for
Federal tax purposes.

From its inception, Taxpayer intended to be treated as a QOF, and relied upon its tax
advisors to complete and file the forms necessary for Taxpayer to obtain QOF status.
Taxpayer was not aware of the requirement to file Form 8996 with Taxpayer’s timely-
filed initial return and believed Accounting Firm 1 was engaged to prepare and file its
Year 1 tax return. For many years prior to the formation of Taxpayer, Accounting Firm 1
worked with Taxpayer’s owners including Party, Taxpayer’s manager, Manager, and
several affiliated companies in State 2. Partner from Accounting Firm 1 was the partner
in charge of that work. Partner has been a certified tax professional since Year 2, and a
principal with Accounting Firm 1 in tax, tax compliance and accounting matters since
Year 3.

In Year 1, Party and Manager advised Accounting Firm 1 that they were investing in
partnerships structured to be QOFs. Party and Manager sought assistance from Law
Firm 1 and Accounting Firm 2 to advise in the formation of these entities. Manager
included Accounting Firm 1 in meetings with Law Firm 1 and Accounting Firm 2
concerning the formation of Taxpayer. Accounting Firm 1 thought Accounting Firm 2
was to prepare the QOF-related tax returns for Taxpayer. However, in Date 4, while
preparing tax returns for Party and Manager, Accounting Firm 1 discovered Accounting
Firm 2 had not prepared Taxpayer’s Year 1, 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income,
or Form 8996. Accounting Firm 2’s understanding was that Accounting Firm 1 was to
prepare all tax returns for Taxpayer.

Once it was discovered that the Year 1 tax return had not been prepared or filed,
Taxpayer engaged Accounting Firm 2 to complete its tax returns. Accounting Firm 2
completed and filed the Year 1 tax return and Form 8996 on Date 5. Accounting Firm 2
also retained Law Firm 2 to assist with preparing the instant private letter ruling request
for an extension of time to make a timely QOF election.

                                  LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code directs the Secretary to
prescribe regulations for rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)
of the Income Tax Regulations provides the rules for an entity to self-certify as a QOF.
Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to be certified as a QOF
must do so annually on a timely filed return in such form and manner as may be
PLR-108210-24                                 3

prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service
forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund,
with its tax return for the year to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be
filed by the due date of the tax return (including extensions). Taxpayer did not file its
Form 8996 by the due date of its partnership return because Manager was unaware of
the filing deadline and requirements, and due to confusion between the two accounting
firms.

Because § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for an entity to self-
certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in § 301.9100-
1(b).

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory
election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for
regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2) will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the
interests of the government.

Under § 301.9100-3(b), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good
faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is
discovered by the Service, or reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the
tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. However,
a taxpayer is not considered to have reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if
the taxpayer knew or should have known that the professional was not competent to
render advice on the regulatory election or was not aware of all relevant facts.

In addition, § 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—

       (i)     seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has
               been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests
               relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for
               which relief is requested;

       (ii)    was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and
               related tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or

       (iii)   uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since
               the original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer,
               the Service will not ordinarily grant relief.
PLR-108210-24                                 4


Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable
extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the government are prejudiced
if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate
for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the
election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the interests of the government are ordinarily
prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made or
any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made
are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the
taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief would not prejudice the interests of the government. Manager was unaware of the
filing deadlines and requirements for self-certifying as a QOF and believed Accounting
Firm 1 would initiate the process. Taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the
election. Consequently, the Form 8996 attached to Taxpayer’s return for Year 1, filed
Date 5, is considered timely filed, and Taxpayer has thereby made the election under
§ 1400Z-2 and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) to self-certify as a QOF for Year 1. Taxpayer
should submit a copy of this letter ruling to the Service Center where Taxpayer files its
returns along with a cover letter requesting that the Service associate this ruling with the
Year 1 return.

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This
office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling.
However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in
§ 1.1400Z2(a)–1(b)(34) or whether Taxpayer meets the requirements under § 1400Z-2
and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF. Further, we also express no opinion on
whether any interest owned in any entity by Taxpayer qualifies as qualified opportunity
zone property, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(2), or whether such entity would be treated as
a qualified opportunity zone business, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3). We express no
opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any
PLR-108210-24                                  5

other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax
treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant
transaction.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

                                                   Sincerely,



                                                   Amy J. Pfalzgraf
                                                   Branch Chief, Branch 5
                                                   (Income Tax and Accounting)


 cc: -----------------------
     ---------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.