Late Form 3115 and bonus depreciation election treated as timely
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation intended to file an accounting method change for self-constructed asset costs and elect out of bonus depreciation for specified property placed in service during the year. It timely sent a duplicate Form 3115 to the IRS but inadvertently failed to file Form 7004, so its return, original Form 3115, and bonus-depreciation election statement were late. The corporation promptly contacted the IRS and obtained professional advice after discovering the missed extension. The IRS found the discretionary relief standards satisfied and treated the Form 3115 and section 168(k)(7) election attached to the filed return as timely. The ruling did not extend the deadlines for Form 7004 or Form 1120 and did not decide whether the accounting method change or property classifications were otherwise correct.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the corporation's Form 3115 and election out of bonus depreciation be treated as timely despite the late income tax return?
- Outcome: Approved for the Form 3115 and section 168(k)(7) election, but not for Form 7004 or Form 1120
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 168(k)(7), 263A, 446(e), 481(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-2(f), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2015-13
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202449010 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/6/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.10-01, 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
---------------- ----------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ --------------------
---------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------- CC:ITA:B07
-------- PLR-110684-24
Date:
August 28, 2024
Re: Request for extension of time to file Form 3115, Application for Change in
Accounting Method, and to make the election not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation
Legend
Taxpayer = ------------------------------
--------------------------
Date1 = -----------------------
Date2 = -----------------------
Date3 = --------------------------
Date4 = ------------------------
Date5 = ----------------------
Date6 = ---------------------
Date7 = --------------------
A = -----------------
Firm1 = -----------------------
Firm2 = ----------------
Dear ------------:
This letter ruling responds to a letter dated May 16, 2024, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted by Taxpayer, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of
time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to: (1) file the original Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting
Method, to change its method of accounting described below as required under section
6.03(1)(a)(i)(A) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, 2015-5 I.R.B. 419, 432, beginning for the taxable
year beginning Date1, and ended Date2 (Taxable Year); and (2) make the election not
to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)(7) of the Internal Revenue
Code for 7-year property and 15-year property (as described in § 168(e)) and computer
PLR-110684-24 2
software (as described in § 167(f)(1)) that were placed in service by Taxpayer in
Taxable Year.
All references in this letter ruling to § 168(k) are treated as a reference to §
168(k) as in effect after amendment by Public Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (Dec. 22,
2017), commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). Further, all
references in this letter ruling to § 1.168(k)-2 of the Income Tax Regulations are treated
as a reference to the final regulations under § 1.168(k)-2 published in the Federal
Register on November 10, 2020 (85 FR 71734).
This letter ruling is being issued electronically in accordance with section 7.02(5)
of Rev. Proc. 2024-1, 2024-1 I.R.B. 1, 34.
FACTS
Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:
Taxpayer, a C corporation, files a consolidated Form 1120, U.S. Corporation
Income Tax Return, on a fiscal year basis. Taxpayer’s overall method of accounting is
an accrual method.
With respect to the request for an extension of time to file the original Form 3115,
beginning for Taxable Year, Taxpayer wanted to change its method of accounting to
capitalize certain expenses related to self-constructed assets used in its trade or
business pursuant to § 263A. Taxpayer produces manufacturing equipment for internal
use and constructs building improvements. Taxpayer believes that this change in
method of accounting could be implemented under the automatic change procedures of
Rev. Proc. 2015-13. Thus, in accord with the automatic change procedures of Rev.
Proc. 2015-13, Taxpayer should have completed the original, signed Form 3115,
reflecting the desired accounting method change, and attached this original to
Taxpayer’s timely filed consolidated federal income tax return for Taxable Year.
Pursuant to Section 6.03(1)(a)(i) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, Taxpayer filed a
duplicate copy of the Form 3115 with the Ogden service center on Date3, which date is
before Date4, the due date (excluding any extension) for Taxpayer’s consolidated
federal income tax return for Taxable Year.
With respect to the request for an extension of time to make the election not to
deduct the additional first year depreciation, Taxpayer wanted to make an election
under § 168(k)(7) to forego additional first year depreciation on 7-year property and 15-
year property (as described in § 168(e)) and computer software (as described in §
167(f)(1)) that were placed in service by Taxpayer in Taxable Year.
The due date (excluding any extension) for Taxpayer’s consolidated federal
income tax return for Taxable Year was Date4. Taxpayer intended to request an
PLR-110684-24 3
extension of time to file its consolidated federal income tax return to Date5. However,
due to an inadvertent oversight, Taxpayer failed to timely file Form 7004, Application for
Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information, and
Other Returns, for Taxable Year to extend the due date for its consolidated federal
income tax return. On Date6, Taxpayer discovered that its Form 7004 had not been
filed. Taxpayer filed its consolidated federal income tax return, implementing the
proposed changes as described above, on Date7, which date is after Date6 but before
Date5.
As a result of Taxpayer’s failure to timely file Form 7004 for Taxable Year,
Taxpayer did not timely file its Form 1120. For that reason, the original Form 3115 and
the § 168(k)(7) election statement were not attached to a timely filed federal income tax
return for Taxable Year.
On the same day of the discovery of the Taxpayer’s failure to file its Form 7004,
Taxpayer reached out to its main Internal Revenue Service (Service) account contact in
A to inform the Service of the missed extension and to discuss how to remedy this
inadvertent oversight.
Shortly after its discussions with the Service, Taxpayer consulted with Firm1 and
Firm2 regarding potential remedies for late filing of the original Form 3115 and the §
168(k)(7) election statement. Both Firm1 and Firm2 advised Taxpayer to file this
request for relief under § 301.9100-3.
Taxpayer then filed this request to obtain an extension of time pursuant to §§
301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to file its original Form 3115 and to make the election not to
deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k).
Taxpayer has represented that, in requesting an extension of time to make the
elections described herein for Taxable Year, it acted reasonably and in good faith and,
further, there is no prejudice to the interest of the Government.
RULING REQUESTED
Taxpayer requests an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to
file the original Form 3115 as required by Rev. Proc. 2015-13 to change its method of
accounting for expenses related to self-constructed assets under § 263A, effective for
Taxable Year, and to make the election under § 168(k)(7) not to deduct the additional
first year depreciation under § 168(k) for 7-year property, 15-year property, and
computer software that were placed in service by Taxpayer in Taxable Year.
PLR-110684-24 4
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Filing of the Form 3115 under Rev. Proc. 2015-13.
Rev. Proc. 2015-13, as clarified and modified by Rev. Proc. 2015-33, 2015-24
I.R.B. 1067, and as modified by Rev. Proc. 2021-34, 2021-35 I.R.B. 337, by Rev. Proc.
2021-26, 2021-22 I.R.B. 1163, by Rev. Proc. 2017-59, 2017-48 I.R.B. 543, and by
section 17.02(b) and (c) of Rev. Proc. 2016-1, 2016-1 I.R.B. 1, provides the procedures
by which a taxpayer may obtain automatic consent to change certain accounting
methods. Pursuant to section 9 of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, a taxpayer that complies with all
the applicable provisions of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, and implements the change in method
of accounting on its federal income tax return for the requested year of change to which
the original Form 3115 is attached pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, has
obtained the consent of the Commissioner to change its method of accounting under §
446(e) and the regulations thereunder.
Section 6.03(1)(a)(i) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13 provides that a taxpayer changing a
method of accounting under the automatic change procedures must complete and file a
Form 3115 in duplicate. The original Form 3115 must be attached to the taxpayer’s
timely filed (including any extensions) original Federal income tax return for the year of
change, and a copy (with signature) of the Form 3115 must be filed with the Ogden, UT
office of the Service no earlier than the first day of the year of change and no later than
the date the taxpayer files the original Form 3115 with the Federal income tax return for
the requested year of change.
Election Out of Additional First Year Depreciation Under § 168(k)(7).
Section 168(k)(1) allows, in the taxable year that qualified property is placed in
service by the taxpayer, an additional first year depreciation deduction equal to the
applicable percentage of the adjusted basis of that qualified property.
Section 168(k)(7) allows a taxpayer to elect out of additional first year
depreciation for any class of property placed in service during a taxable year. Section
1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(i) provides that if this election is made, the election applies to all
qualified property that is in the same class of property and placed in service in the same
taxable year, and no additional first year depreciation deduction is allowable for the
property placed in service during the taxable year for the class of property, except as
provided in § 1.743-1(j)(4)(i)(B)(1). The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)-
2(f)(1)(ii) as meaning, among other things, each class of property described in § 168(e)
(for example, 5-year property).
Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(A) provides that the election not to deduct additional
first year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the
federal tax return for the taxable year in which the qualified property is placed in service
by the taxpayer.
PLR-110684-24 5
Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(B) provides that the election not to deduct additional
first year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562,
“Depreciation and Amortization,” and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for
Taxable Year provide that the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
is made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer’s timely filed federal tax return
indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.
Extensions of Time to Make Elections under §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has the discretion to grant
a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-
3 to make certain regulatory elections.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due
date is prescribed by regulations published in the Federal Register, a revenue ruling,
revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
The requested accounting method change is a regulatory election because the due date
of the change is prescribed in § 1.446-1(e) and section 6.03(1)(a)(i) of Rev. Proc. 2015-
-
The requested election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation is also a
regulatory election because the due date of the election is prescribed in § 1.168(k)-
2(f)(1)(iii)(A).Taxpayer’s request must be analyzed under the requirements of § 301.9100-3
because the automatic extensions provided in § 301.9100-2 are not applicable.Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3will be granted when a taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the
granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.Section 301.9100-3(c)(2) imposes special rules for accounting method regulatory
elections. This section provides, in relevant part, that the interests of the Government
are deemed to be prejudiced except in unusual and compelling circumstances when the
accounting method regulatory election for which relief is requested is subject to the
procedure described in § 1.446-1(e)(3)(i) or the relief requires an adjustment under §
481(a) (or would require an adjustment under § 481(a) if the taxpayer changed to the
PLR-110684-24 6
accounting method for which relief is requested in a taxable year subsequent to the
taxable year the election should have been made).
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted an extension of time to file the required original Form 3115,
effective for Taxable Year, and to make the election under § 168(k)(7) not to deduct the
additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for 7-year property, 15-year property,
and computer software that were placed in service by Taxpayer in Taxable Year.
In this regard, we will consider the filing of the Form 3115 and the § 168(k)(7)
election statement with Taxpayer’s consolidated federal income tax return for Taxable
Year, that was filed on Date7, to be timely made.
Except as expressly set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the tax
consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code or
regulations. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning whether: (1) the
accounting method change Taxpayer has made is eligible to be made under the
automatic change procedures of Rev. Proc. 2015-13 and is described in the operative
List of Automatic Changes revenue procedure; (2) Taxpayer otherwise meets the
requirements of Rev. Proc. 2015-13 to make the accounting method changes using the
automatic change procedures of Rev. Proc. 2015-13; (3) Taxpayer’s proposed § 263A
accounting method is correct; (4) any item of depreciable property placed in service by
Taxpayer during Taxable Year is eligible for the additional first year depreciation under
§ 168(k); or (5) Taxpayer’s classification of any item of depreciable or amortizable
property under § 168(e) or 167(f)(1) is correct.
Further, this letter ruling does not grant any extension of time for the filing of
Taxpayer’s Form 7004 or its Form 1120 for Taxable Year.
The ruling contained in this letter ruling is based upon facts and representations
submitted by Taxpayer with an accompanying penalty of perjury statement executed by
the appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of this request for an extension of time to file the required Forms 3115 and to
make the election under § 168(k)(7) not to deduct the additional first year depreciation,
all material is subject to verification on examination.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-110684-24 7
In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter
ruling to Taxpayer’s authorized representatives. We are also sending a copy of this
letter ruling to the appropriate Service operating division official.
Sincerely,
Charles J. Magee
CHARLES J. MAGEE
Senior Counsel, Branch 7
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax and Accounting)
Enclosures (2):
copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes
cc: -------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
-----------------------
----------------------------
------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
--------------------------
----------------------------
------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.