Partnership receives 120 days for a late section 754 election after distributions

Number
202445001
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Manner of Electing Optional Adjustment to Basis of Partnership Property; Section 754; Manner of Electing Optional Adjustment to Basis of Partnership Property
Code sections
§ 734, § 743, § 754, § 6227, § 6110
Ruling dated
August 2, 2024
Publicly released
November 8, 2024

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A limited liability company taxed as a partnership made liquidating distributions to partners during and after a tax year but inadvertently failed to make a section 754 election with that year's return. The IRS found that the discretionary relief requirements were satisfied and granted 120 days to make the election for that year and later years. The partnership may file the election statement with the service center for association with the return or, when appropriate, with Form 8082 and related administrative adjustment request filings. The relief requires the partnership to reconstruct section 734(b) and 743(b) basis adjustments and allowed-or-allowable recovery deductions as though the election had been timely, including for closed years. Partners must also adjust their partnership-interest bases, and the ruling does not decide whether the partnership is otherwise eligible for the election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership make a late section 754 election covering a year with liquidating distributions?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days and retroactive basis-adjustment conditions
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 734(b), 743(b), 754, 6227(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202445001
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/8/2024
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 754.00-00, 9100.15-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. -----------------
-------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------------
--------------------
--------------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-102272-24
Date:
August 02, 2024

Legend

X = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

State = --------

Date = --------------------------

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated January 26, 2024, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by X's authorized representative, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

Facts

The information submitted states that X is a State limited liability company that is classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes. Liquidating distributions to partners of X were made during and after the taxable year ending Date. However, X inadvertently failed to make a timely election under § 754 with its return for its taxable year ending Date.

Law and Analysis

Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property shall be adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734, and,

PLR-102272-24
2

in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, must be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including extensions) for filing the return for such taxable year.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Conclusion

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X is granted an extension of time of one hundred-twenty (120) days from the date of this letter to make a § 754 election for its taxable year ending Date and thereafter. The election should be made in a written statement filed with the applicable service center either (1) to be associated with X's taxable year ending Date, or (2) accompanying Form 8082, Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR), and any related filings as instructed in Form 8082, as appropriate. A copy of this letter should be attached to the statement.

PLR-102272-24
3

This ruling is contingent on X's relevant filing(s) containing adjustments to the basis of X's properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been made if the § 754 election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect any additional deductions for recovery of basis related to X's property that would have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any deductions for recovery of basis allowable for an open year are to be computed based on the remaining useful life or recovery period and using property basis adjusted by the greater of such deductions allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely made.

If X is required to file an AAR in order to properly amend a partnership return, then this ruling is also contingent on X filing Form 1065-X or Form 8082 and taking into account the adjustments as required by § 6227(b).

Additionally, the partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to reflect what the basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of X must reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional deductions for the recovery of basis related to X's property that would have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made.

Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-102272-24
4

In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Holly Porter
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

By: __ _____
Caroline E. Hay
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosure
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes

cc: ---------------------------------------------------
-------------------
----------------------------
--------------------------
---------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
----------

------------------------------------------
-----------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace