Late section 754 election allowed after apartment interest sale
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A partnership owned an apartment complex and a vacant development lot that it subdivided into separate parcels and tied to separate classes of partnership interests. One partner sold all of its apartment-parcel interests to two other partners while retaining its development-parcel interests. The partnership intended to make a section 754 election for the transfer but omitted it from its timely return. The IRS granted 120 days to file the election. The resulting section 743(b) adjustment for the sale must apply only to the apartment parcel and other property whose tax items are allocated to the apartment-interest holders, and all retroactive partnership and partner basis adjustments remain required.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the partnership make a late section 754 election after a partner sold only its apartment-parcel interests?
- Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file and required retroactive basis adjustments
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 734(b), 743(b), 754, 6227(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202440001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/4/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 754.00-00, 754.02-00,
9100.00-00, 9100.15-00 Person To Contact:
--------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------- --------------------
----------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------- CC:PSI:B01
------------------------------------- PLR-100391-24
Fax: ------------------------------------------------------ Date:
---------------------------------------------------------- July 03, 2024
LEGEND
X = ------------------------------------------------
EIN: ----------------
A = ----------------------------------------------
EIN: ----------------
B = --------------------------------
EIN: ----------------
C = ----------------------------
EIN: ----------------
State = -------------
N = ------
Date 1 = ------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
Date 4 = --------------------------
PLR-100391-24 2
Dear ----------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated December 15, 2023, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting
an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations for X to file an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
FACTS
According to the information submitted, X was formed as a limited liability company
under the laws of State on Date 1 and is classified as a partnership for Federal income
tax purposes.
X owned a single tract of real estate (Property) that contained an apartment complex
(Apartment Parcel) and a vacant lot (Development Parcel). Prior to Date 3, X caused
Property to be subdivided so Apartment Parcel and Development Parcel became
separate tracts for real estate law purposes.
On Date 2, X amended and restated its limited liability company agreement to create
separate interests with respect to Apartment Parcel (Apartment Parcel Percentage
Interests) and Development Parcel (Development Parcel Percentage Interests). Under
the terms of the agreement, the income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit derived from
Apartment Parcel or Development Parcel, respectively, would be solely allocable to the
holders of the Apartment Parcel Percentage Interests or Development Parcel
Percentage Interests, respectively.
Prior to Date 3, A owned N% of both the Apartment Parcel Percentage Interests and
Development Parcel Percentage Interests. On Date 3, A sold all its Apartment Parcel
Percentage Interests to each of B and C, in equal shares, but retained its N% ownership
of the Development Parcel Percentage Interests. Due to A’s sale of all its interest in the
Apartment Parcel Percentage Interests to B and C, X intended to file a § 754 election to
adjust the basis of X’s property for the taxable year ending Date 4, but X inadvertently
failed to timely file the election with its otherwise timely filed return for the taxable year
ending Date 4.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 754 provides that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with the
regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property is adjusted, in
the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734 and, in the case of
a transfer of a partnership interest by sale or exchange or upon the death of a partner,
in the manner provided in § 743. Such an election shall apply with respect to all
distributions of property by the partnership and to all transfers of interests in the
PLR-100391-24 3
partnership during the taxable year with respect to which the election was filed and all
subsequent taxable years.
Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754
to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a
distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, shall be
made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during
which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be
filed no later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including extensions thereof)
for filing the return for that taxable year.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301-9100-3 to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the
case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code
except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term “regulatory
election” includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in
the Federal Register.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section
301-9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for regulatory elections that
do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Under § 301.9100-3, a request for extension of time will be granted when the taxpayer
provides evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X
is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make a § 754
election for its taxable year ended Date 4. The election should be made in a written
statement filed with the appropriate service center accompanying Form 1065-X,
Amended Return or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR), or Form 8082, Notice of
Inconsistent Treatment or AAR, and any related filings as instructed in Form 1065-X or
Form 8082, as appropriate. A copy of this letter should be attached to the relevant filing.
This ruling is contingent on X’s relevant filing(s) containing adjustments to the basis of
X’s properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been
made if the § 754 election had been timely made. Regarding the § 743(b) adjustment
relating to A’s sale of its Apartment Parcel Percentage Interests to B and C, the
PLR-100391-24 4
adjustments shall only be made to the basis of Apartment Parcel and other property the
income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit from which is allocable to holders of the
Apartment Parcel Percentage Interests. These basis adjustments must reflect any
additional deductions for recovery of basis related to X’s property that would have been
allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether the
statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for
any year subject to this grant of relief. Any deductions for the recovery of basis
allowable for an open year are to be computed based on the remaining useful life or
recovery period and using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any such
deductions allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely
made.
If X is required to file an AAR to properly amend a partnership tax return, then this ruling
is contingent on X filing Form 1065-X or Form 8082 and taking into account the
adjustments as required by § 6227(b).
Additionally, affected partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to reflect
what the basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of
whether the statutory period of limitations on assessment or filing a claim for refund has
expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of X
must reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional deductions
for the recovery of basis related to X’s property that would have been allowable if the
§ 754 election had been timely made.
Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
Federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for
making an election is not a determination that a taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make
the election.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the requested ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy
of this letter ruling to your authorized representative.
PLR-100391-24 5
Sincerely,
/s/
Laura C. Fields
Branch Chief, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc: -------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
---------------------------------------
--------------
-------------------------
----------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.