IRS grants a 120-day extension to make a late allocation of GST exemption after the accountant omitted it
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A married couple created and funded a trust for their children and more remote descendants, a trust that could later trigger generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax when assets pass to grandchildren or beyond. To shield transfers from GST tax, a taxpayer allocates their lifetime GST exemption to the trust, usually on a timely gift tax return (Form 709). The couple hired a qualified tax professional who prepared and filed their gift tax returns but failed to actually allocate their GST exemption to the reported transfers to the trust. The error was caught the next year. The couple asked the IRS for an extension to allocate the Wife's remaining GST exemption. Under the "9100" rules, a taxpayer who reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who then failed to make the election is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith. The IRS found the standards met and granted the Wife 120 days to allocate her available GST exemption to the trust, effective as of the date of transfer, on amended Forms 709. (A procedural note: the section 301.9100-3 route no longer applies to section 2642(g) relief requests filed on or after May 6, 2024, but this request predated that change, so the older route still governed.)
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a taxpayer whose tax professional failed to allocate her GST exemption on a timely gift tax return get an extension of time to make the allocation?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 2642(g), 2632, 2631; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 (including 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v), reasonable reliance on a tax professional); Treas. Reg. § 26.2642-7
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202439009
Release Date: 9/27/2024
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 2632.00-00, 2642.00-00
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B04
PLR-110590-24
Date:
June 26, 2024
In Re: [redacted]
Legend
Husband = [redacted]
Wife = [redacted]
Trust: = [redacted]
Date 1 = [redacted]
Date 2 = [redacted]
Year 1 = [redacted]
Year 2 = [redacted]
Accounting Firm = [redacted]
Dear ---------------:
This letter responds to your authorized representative's letter dated January 31, 2024,
and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time under § 2642(g) of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to allocate Wife's generation-skipping transfer (GST)
exemption to trusts.
The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:
Husband and Wife created and funded Trust on Date 1. Husband and Wife made
additional transfers to Trust on Date 2.
Trust provides lifetime interests for the children of Husband and Wife and after their
deaths to more remote issue. Trust has GST potential. It is represented that Trust was
not a GST Trust within the meaning of § 2632(c)(3)(B) in Year 1.
Husband and Wife hired a qualified tax professional from Accounting Firm for tax advice
and to prepare their Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation Skipping Transfer)
Tax Returns, for Year 1. The qualified tax professional prepared and filed Forms 709
for Year 1 for Husband and Wife but failed to affirmatively allocate Husband's and
Wife's GST exemption to the reported transfers. Accordingly, no GST exemption was
allocated to the Date 2 transfers to Trust. In Year 2, the qualified tax professional
discovered the failure to affirmatively allocate Husband's and Wife's GST exemption to
the reported transfers in Year 1.
You have requested an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to allocate
Wife's remaining available GST exemption to Trust.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation
skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as, (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable
termination, and (3) a direct skip.
Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax imposed by § 2601 is the taxable
amount multiplied by the applicable rate.
Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every
individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by such
individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the
transferor.
Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be
irrevocable.
Section 2631(c) provides that, for purposes of § 2631(a), the GST exemption amount
for any calendar year shall be equal to the basic exclusion amount under § 2010(c) for
such calendar year.
Section 2632(a)(1) provides that an individual's GST exemption may be allocated at any
time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's
estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such return is
required to be filed. Section 2632(a)(2) provides that the manner in which allocations
are to be made shall be prescribed by forms or regulations issued by the Secretary.
Section 2642(b)(1)(A) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of
the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or
before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be made
under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1) the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall
be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of
§ 2001(f)(2)), or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of
an estate tax inclusion period, its value at the time of the close of the estate tax
inclusion period.
Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such
circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make
an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under
§ 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
§ 2642(g).
Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under this
paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including
evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such
other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to
grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be
treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except
subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an
extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and
not expressly provided by statute). Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be
granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Under § 301.9100-3(g)(1), the procedures set forth in § 301.9100-3 do not apply to
requests for relief under § 2642(g)(1) that are filed on or after May 6, 2024, regardless
of the date of the transfer. Since this ruling request was filed with the Internal Revenue
Service prior to May 6, 2024, the procedures set forth in § 301.9100-3 may still be
applied to grant relief under § 2642(g)(1). For requests for relief under § 2642(g)(1),
see § 26.2642-7 of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations.
Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the
requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Wife is granted an
extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to allocate Wife's available
GST exemption to Trust. The allocation of GST exemption to the trust will be effective
as of the date of transfer. The allocation of GST exemption to the trust, and the value of
the transfer as determined for federal gift tax purposes will be used in determining the
amount of GST exemption to be allocated to Trust.
The allocation should be made on amended Forms 709. The Forms 709 should be filed
with the Internal Revenue Service at the following address: Internal Revenue Service
Center, ATTN: E&G, Stop 824G, 7940 Kentucky Drive, Florence, KY 41042-2915.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a copy of
this letter to your authorized representatives.
Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
Passthroughs and Special Industries
_______________________________
By: Leslie H. Finlow
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosure:
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.