Craft distillery was not a prohibited liquor store
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A property owner planned to lease space to a craft distillery that would produce, store, and sell spirits. The owner sought the ruling because a qualified opportunity zone business cannot be a store whose principal business is selling alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises under section 144(c)(6)(B). The IRS interpreted that phrase as covering retail sales for off-premises consumption, not wholesale sales for resale. Wholesale sales were expected to be the distillery's largest business segment, while the lease capped off-premises retail alcohol sales at a smaller redacted percentage and required records to enforce the cap. The IRS therefore ruled that the distillery was not a prohibited business under section 144(c)(6)(B), but it did not rule that the owner or any investment qualified under the opportunity-zone rules.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Is the craft distillery a store whose principal business is retail alcohol sales for off-premises consumption?
- Outcome: Approved, the restricted off-premises retail sales were not the distillery's principal business
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 144(c)(6)(B), 1400Z-2(d)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202435006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/30/2024 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 144.01-06
Person To Contact:
------------------------------ -----------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------------- --------------------
--------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP
PLR-123401-23
Date:
June 03, 2024
Legend:
Taxpayer = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
----------------
Tenant = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
----------------
Property = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
--------------------------------
State = -------------
a = -------
b = -------
c = ---
d = -------
e = -----
f = ---
g = ---
h = ---
i = --
PLR-123401-23 2
Dear --------------:
This is in response to your request on behalf of Taxpayer for a ruling that the craft
distillery described below (the Business) will not be treated as a store the principal
business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises within
the meaning of § 144(c)(6)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
FACTS AND REPRESENTATIONS
According to the information submitted and representations made, Taxpayer is a limited
liability company organized under the laws of State. Taxpayer, through its wholly
owned entities, owns Property. Taxpayer has made improvements to Property and has
entered into a lease agreement with Tenant with respect to Property (the Lease).
Tenant will use Property to operate the Business, which involves distilling, storing, and
selling various bottled spirits, such as bourbon, gin, and whiskey. The net square
footage of Property leased to Tenant is a square feet. Tenant will use Property space
as follows: (i) a tasting room and common area, approximately b square feet (the
Tasting Room); (ii) a merchandise (products other than alcoholic beverages) display
area, approximately c square feet (the Display Area); (iii) the craft distillery and product
storage area, approximately d square feet (the Distillery); and (iv) an outdoor space,
approximately e square feet, which can potentially be used as an extension of the
Tasting Room (the Patio). Tenant will also provide tours to the public.
The Business will sell to local distributors, grocery stores, bars, and restaurants on a
wholesale basis most of the alcoholic beverages it produces. The wholesale business,
which is expected to be at least f percent of the annual gross sales revenue of the
Business (based on gross selling prices), represents the largest segment of the
Business.
The Business will also sell alcoholic beverages that it either produces or procures from
local breweries to customers for consumption on premises in the Tasting Room. It is
expected that such sales will be at least g percent of the annual gross sales revenue of
the Business.
In addition, in the Tasting Room, the Business will sell alcoholic beverages that it
produces at Property on a retail basis to customers for consumption off premises. It is
expected that, in any calendar year, sales of alcoholic beverages for consumption off
premises will not exceed h percent of the annual gross sales revenue of the Business
and, under the Lease, Tenant expressly agrees to restrict such sales to no more than h
percent of the annual gross sales revenue of the Business (the Restriction). Tenant is
required to maintain a detailed recordkeeping and reporting system to ensure
compliance with the Restriction. Further, the Lease provides that a violation of the
Restriction will constitute, at Taxpayer’s election, an immediate and incurable default by
Tenant without further notice.
PLR-123401-23 3
Finally, the Business will sell merchandise, such as mugs, glasses, accessories, and
apparel, to customers in the Display Area. These sales are expected to be
approximately i percent of the annual gross sales revenue of the Business.
The Business does not offer its products for sale via the internet. To ensure compliance
with local laws related to age verification, shipping restrictions, and taxation, among
others, all orders are received by the Business via email, phone, or in person.
Taxpayer is requesting this ruling because it intends to qualify as a “qualified
opportunity zone business" under § 1400Z-2(d)(3) of the Code.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1400Z-2(d)(1) defines a qualified opportunity fund (QOF) as any investment
vehicle organized as a corporation or a partnership for the purpose of investing in
qualified opportunity zone property (other than another QOF). This definition also
requires a QOF to hold at least 90 percent of its assets in qualified opportunity zone
property, determined by the average of the percentage of qualified opportunity zone
property held by that QOF as measured (i) on the last day of the first 6-month period of
the taxable year of the QOF, and (ii) on the last day of the taxable year of the QOF.
See § 1400Z-2(d)(1).
Section 1400Z-2(d)(2)(A) defines qualified opportunity zone property as property which
is “qualified opportunity zone stock”, “qualified opportunity zone partnership interest”, or
“qualified opportunity zone business property”. Qualified opportunity zone stock and a
qualified opportunity zone partnership interest must qualify as a qualified opportunity
zone business as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3) during substantially all of the qualified
opportunity fund’s holding period for such stock or partnership interest. See § 1400Z-
2(d)(2)(B) and (C). Among other requirements, § 1400Z-2(d)(3) provides that a
“qualified opportunity zone business” is a trade or business which is not described in
§ 144(c)(6)(B).
Section 144(c)(1) provides that the term “qualified redevelopment bond” means any
bond issued as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to
be used for 1 or more redevelopment purposes in any designated blighted area.
Section 144(c)(6)(B) provides, in relevant part, that the use of the proceeds of an issue
meets the requirements of § 144(c)(6)(B) if no portion of the proceeds of such issue is
to be used to provide (including the provision of land for) any store the principal
business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises.
In the instant case, the issue is whether the Business is a store the principal business of
which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises under
§ 144(c)(6)(B). Section 144(c)(6)(B) does not define the term “sale of alcoholic
beverages for consumption off premises.” There are no regulations or other guidance
under § 144 that defines the term. Thus, in considering whether the term includes the
PLR-123401-23 4
sale of alcoholic beverages on a wholesale basis, we look to the plain and ordinary
meaning of the words “wholesale,” “retail,” and “consumption” as defined in the
dictionary. Ordinarily, “wholesale” refers to the sale of commodities or goods in quantity
usually for resale, and “retail” sale refers to the sale of commodities or goods in small
quantities to ultimate consumers. See wholesale, retail, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate
Dictionary (11th ed. 2003); cf. § 1.141-7(b)(3) (defining “sale at wholesale” as a “sale. . .
to any person for resale”). Therefore, the term “sale of alcoholic beverages for
consumption off premises” under § 144(c)(6)(B) refers to the sale of alcoholic
beverages on a retail basis for consumption off premises.
In this case, the Business sells alcoholic beverages both on a wholesale and retail
basis. The Business’ retail sales of alcoholic beverages include those for consumption
on and off premises. Thus, only a portion of the Business’ sales, that is, the retail sales
of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises, are sales of alcoholic beverages
for consumption off premises within the meaning of § 144(c)(6)(B).
Next, we must determine whether the retail sales for consumption off premises are “the
principal business” of the Business within the meaning of § 144(c)(6)(B).
Section 144(c)(6)(B) does not define “the principal business” for purposes of that
section. When a term is not defined, we use the plain and ordinary meaning. The
Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary defines the term “principal” as most important,
consequential, or influential, chief. Principal, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary
(11th ed. 2003). Similarly, Black’s Law Dictionary defines “principal” as chief, most
important, primary. Principal, Black’s Law Dictionary, (11th ed. 2019). In addition, the
use of the definite article “the” before the term “principal business” (as opposed to the
indefinite article “a”) indicates that § 144(c)(6)(B) should be read to mean that there is
only one principal business. See generally, Love v. Comm’r, 103 T.C.M. (CCH) 1887
(2012), Plains Petroleum Co. v. Comm’r, 78 T.C.M. (CCH) 130 (1999) (interpreting the
term “the principal purpose” to mean the purpose that exceeds in importance any other
purpose as used in the anti-avoidance provision under § 269 of the Code); Guenther v.
Comm’r, 69 T.C.M. (CCH) 2980 (1995) (interpreting the term “a principal purpose” to be
synonymous with “one of its principal purposes” as used in the anti-avoidance provision
under § 453(g) of the Code).
To determine “the principal business” of the Business for purposes of §144(c)(6)(B), we
examine the facts and representations provided by Taxpayer. Here, Property is
generally divided to conduct different business segments in different areas. The
Distillery is generally used to produce and store the alcoholic beverages for both
wholesale and retail sale; but the Distillery will also be used for customer tours of the
production process, which are intended to further generate retail sales (both for
consumption on and off premises). The Tasting Room will be used for retail sales of
alcoholic beverages, both for consumption on premises and off premises. Whether it is
predominantly used for on-premises or off-premises consumption sales can vary daily.
In addition, the Tasting Room may be expanded into the Patio, which is expected to be
used in connection with retail sales for consumption on premises. As such, the portion
PLR-123401-23 5
of Property attributable to sales of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises is
not readily determinable and, therefore, is not a reliable indicator of the Business’
principal business.
However, in the instant case, the Business’ sale of alcoholic beverages at wholesale,
based on expected annual gross sales revenue, represents the largest business
segment of the Business. In contrast, the Business’ retail sale of alcoholic beverages
for consumption off premises is expected to be, and is restricted to, no more than h
percent of the annual gross sales revenue of the Business. To comply with the
Restriction, Tenant is required to maintain a detailed recordkeeping and reporting
system. A violation of the Restriction by Tenant may be deemed by Taxpayer as an
immediate and incurable default under the Lease. Accordingly, the Business’ retail sale
of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises is not its principal business. As
such, we need not decide whether the Business is a store within the meaning of
§ 144(c)(6)(B).
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
the Business is not a store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic
beverages for consumption off premises within the meaning of § 144(c)(6)(B).
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in
§ 1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(34) of the Income Tax Regulations or whether the taxpayer meets
the requirements under § 1400Z-2 of the Code and the regulations thereunder to be a
QOF. Further, we also express no opinion on whether any interest in any entity owned
by Taxpayer qualifies as qualified opportunity zone property, as defined in § 1400Z-
2(d)(2), or whether any business would be treated as a qualified opportunity zone
business, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3). We express no opinion regarding the tax
treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the
Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any
conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
PLR-123401-23 6
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
Jian H. Grant
Branch Chief, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)
cc: ----------------------
------------------------
-------------------------
---------------
---------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
------------------------------
-----------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2024, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.