Partnership penalties differ under collection and push-out rules

Number
202417018
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Extension of Subchapter To Windfall Profits Tax (Repealed)
Code sections
§ 6232, § 6662
Ruling dated
January 11, 2024
Publicly released
April 26, 2024

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2024, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel explained that partnership-level penalties are handled differently under Section 6232(f) and the partnership push-out rules. Under Section 6232(f), partners become liable for the unpaid partnership balance, including the imputed underpayment, penalties, and interest, allocated according to their proportionate shares. The penalty in that setting has already been assessed at the partnership level. Under a push out, the applicability of a penalty and the adjustments to which it applies go to the reviewed-year partners. Each partner then computes the penalty using the partner's own change in tax, facts, circumstances, and applicable thresholds.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How are penalties handled when partners owe an unpaid partnership balance under Section 6232(f), compared with a partnership push out?
  • Outcome: advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6232(f), 6662

Full text (IRS public release)

 ID:        CCA_2024032913553848               [Third Party Communication:

 UILC:      6232.00-00 R 1988                  Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 202417018
Release Date: 4/26/2024
From: --------------------
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 8:33:24 AM
To: -----------------------
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Penalty question


Hi -----------,

Not a bother at all!

Penalties are handled differently under section 6232(f) and push out. Under section
6232(f) the partners are liable for what the partnership has not paid. It takes the balance
of what the partnership owes (the imputed underpayment, penalties, interest) and splits
it amongst the partners based on their proportionate share. So in that case, the penalty
has already been assessed at the partnership level (the imputed underpayment x the
penalty rate).

For push out, it’s like TEFRA, the applicability of the penalty and what adjustments it
applies to are pushed out to the reviewed year partners. For example, that the section
6662 substantial understatement penalty of 20% applies to the adjustment to X. When
the partners compute what their change in tax would have been if they had reported to
begin with, they will compute the penalty as well, based on the partner’s own facts and
circumstances (including any thresholds, etc.).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Jenni

Jenni Black (she/her)
Senior Counsel
CC:PA:06
Phone: (202) 317-5216

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace