Late opportunity fund self-certification allowed
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A partnership was formed to qualify as a qualified opportunity fund and hold interests in a qualified opportunity zone business. Its accounting firm knew of that intention and extended the partnership's return, but inadvertently omitted Form 8996 when transmitting the return. The firm discovered the omission during a routine review, notified the partnership, and recommended requesting regulatory relief. The partnership represented that it acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would neither prejudice the government nor reduce its tax liability. The IRS granted 60 days to file Form 8996 with an amended return or administrative adjustment request and self-certify as a qualified opportunity fund effective from its formation month. The IRS did not decide whether the partnership, its investments, or the underlying business otherwise met the opportunity-zone requirements.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the partnership file a late Form 8996 to self-certify as a qualified opportunity fund from its formation month?
- Outcome: Approved, with Form 8996 due within 60 days
- Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202350006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/15/2023 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1400Z.02-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------- --------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B05
-------------------------------- PLR-106773-23
Date:
September 15, 2023
Legend
Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State = -------------
State 2 = ---------
Member 1 = --------------------
Member 2 = ---------------------
Member 3 = -------------------
Member 4 = ------------------
Firm = ----------------------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------
Date 4 = ----------------------
Month 1 = ----------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Dear --------------:
This ruling responds to Taxpayer’s request for a letter ruling dated Date 1. Specifically,
Taxpayer requests an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administrations Regulations to (1) make a timely election under
§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations to be certified as a qualified
opportunity fund (QOF), as defined in § 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code); and (2) for Taxpayer to be treated as a QOF, effective as of the month
PLR-106773-23 2
Taxpayer was formed in Year 1, as provided under § 1400Z-2(d) of the Code and
§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations.
FACTS
Taxpayer, a limited liability company classified as a partnership for Federal income tax
purposes, organized under the laws of State on Date 2. Taxpayer is an accrual method
taxpayer and reports income on a calendar year basis. Taxpayer was formed to meet
the definition of § 1400Z-2(d) of the Code and to hold qualified opportunity zone
partnership interests, as defined in code § 1400Z-2(d)(2)(A)(ii), in a qualified opportunity
zone business (“QOZB”). Taxpayer is comprised of 4 members: Member 1, Member 2,
Member 3, and Member 4. Member 1 and Member 2 are a married couple residing in
State 2. Member 3 and Member 4 are a married couple residing in State 2. Taxpayer is
managed by Member 1 and Member 3.
Taxpayer engaged Firm to prepare and file an extension for Taxpayer’s federal income
tax return for Year 1, including, the preparation of the Form 8996 by the extended due
date of that return. On or before Date 3, Firm properly extended the due date for
Taxpayer’s Year 1 return. Firm was aware of the Taxpayer’s intention to be a QOF, but
inadvertently failed to attach the Form 8996 when the Taxpayer’s Year 1 return was
transmitted on Date 4. During a routine review by Firm of Taxpayer’s Year 1 return,
Firm discovered that the Form 8996 had not been included with Taxpayer’s Year 1
return.
Upon discovering that Firm failed to include the Form 8996 with Taxpayer’s Year 1
Federal income tax return, Firm notified Taxpayer and advised Taxpayer to request an
extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations.
Taxpayer represents that it acted reasonably and in good faith in accordance with the
standards in § 301.9100-3(b) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.
Taxpayer represents that the granting of relief under this letter ruling request will not
prejudice the interest of the Government. Taxpayer also represents that granting of the
relief under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations will not
result in a lower tax liability for the years affected by the election.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Code directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations for
the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations
provides the rules for an entity to self-certify as a QOF. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i)
provides that the entity electing to be certified as a QOF must do so annually on a timely
field return in in such form and manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of
PLR-106773-23 3
Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service forms or instructions, or in
publications or guidance of the Service, published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 with its tax return for the year
to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the
Federal income tax return (including extensions).
Because § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations sets forth the manner
and timing for an entity to self-certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections,
as defined in § 301.9100-1(b) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether
to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-3(a)
provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections, other than
automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2, will be granted when the taxpayer
provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government.
Under section § 301.9100-3(b) a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in
good faith if, among other things not relevant here, the taxpayer requests relief before
the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service, or reasonably
relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise
the taxpayer to make the election. However, a taxpayer is not considered to have
reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have
known that the professional was not competent to render advice on the regulatory
election or was not aware of all relevant facts.
In addition, section provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably
and in good faith pursuant to the provision in § 301.9100-3(b)(3) if the taxpayer –
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been
or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and
the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is
requested;
PLR-106773-23 4
(ii) was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and related
tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service
will not ordinarily grant relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides that
the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of time to make the regulatory
election only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the
granting of relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a
taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the
election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking
into account the time value of money).
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which
the regulatory election should have been made or any taxable year that would have
been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of
limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) of the Code before the taxpayer’s receipt of
a ruling granting relief under this section.
Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief would not prejudice the interests of the Government. Accordingly, based solely on
the facts and information submitted, and the representations made in the ruling request,
we grant Taxpayer an extension of 60 days from the date of this letter ruling to file a
Form 8996 to make the election to self-certify as a QOF under section 1400Z-2 and
section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i). The election must be made on a completed Form 8996
attached to the Taxpayer’s amended tax return or administrative-adjustment request (as
applicable).
This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by all appropriate parties.
This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a
ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
PLR-106773-23 5
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in §
1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(34) of the Income Tax Regulations or whether the taxpayer meets the
requirements under § 1400Z-2 of the Code and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF.
Further, we also express no opinion on whether any interest in any QOZB owned by
Taxpayer qualifies as qualified opportunity zone property, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(2),
or whether any business would be treated as a qualified opportunity zone business, as
defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3). We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the
instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations
that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the
time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
Sincerely,
Kyle C. Griffin
Senior Counsel, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax and Accounting)
cc: -----------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.