Large museum grant recognized as unusual
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A publicly supported museum expected a very large grant and potential gift from an unrelated private operating foundation. The funds would build a new museum wing, improve the existing museum, renovate the campus for outdoor sculptures, and retire long-term debt. The donor had no prior substantial-support, authority, control, or disqualified-person relationship with the museum, and no donor affiliate would control the museum after the transfer. The museum had historically passed the one-third public-support test without unusual-grant exclusions, actively solicited public contributions, and expected continued public support. The IRS recognized the transfer as an unusual grant that could be excluded from the public-support fraction, preventing its size alone from jeopardizing the museum's public-charity classification.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does the unrelated foundation's unusually large museum grant qualify for exclusion as an unusual grant when measuring public support?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), 501(c)(3), 509(a)(1), 4946; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii), 1.509(a)-3(c)(4)
Full text (IRS public release)
Department of the Treasury Date:
Internal Revenue Service 09/13/2023
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Employer ID number:
IRS PO BOX 2508
CINCINNATI, OH 45201 Person to contact:
Name:
Release Number: 202349019
Release Date: 12/8/2023
LEGEND UIL: 509.02-01
B = Name
C = year
D = year
r dollars = Greater than
s dollars = $
u percent = percent
Dear
We have considered your request for recognition of an unusual grant under Treasury Regulation
Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions.
Based on the information provided, we concluded that the proposed grant constitutes an unusual grant under
Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions of the regulations. The basis for our conclusion
is discussed below.
Facts:
You are tax exempt under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3). You're currently classified as a
public charity described in Sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). You will receive a grant and a potential
gift from B, which is an unrelated private operating foundation exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3), for r
dollars. B has agreed to pay you r dollars upon the endorsement of the grant agreement. However, upon receipt
of the grant and potential gift from B, your status as a publicly supported organization will be jeopardized.
There is no prior connection between you and B because B has never provided funds that would constitute any
significant portion of your annual public support, or stood in a position of authority with regard to you, or any
person related to such person within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946
(a)(1)(G). After the completion of the gifts, no one affiliated with B will directly or indirectly exercise control
over your organization. You will have ultimate responsibility for the proper management and administration of
the funds from the grant and plan to use the funds to: (i) to build a new wing on your museum to house and
exhibit two-dimensional art and small sculptures, (ii) to make improvements to the existing museum, (iii) as
capital funds to renovate your -acre campus to prepare for the appropriate display of large outdoor sculptures,
and (iv) as capital funds to retire your long-term debt.
Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y
You have averaged in the range of s dollars in annual revenues for the years C through D. Your public support
has been in the range of u percent for the past five years. You have met the one-third support test described in
Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to Treas.
Reg. Section 1.509-3(c)(3). In addition, you are actively soliciting contributions from the general public and
reasonably expect to attract a significant amount of public support after the particular grant is received.
Law:
Two sections of the Treasury Regulations set forth the criteria for an unusual grant. They are:
Treasury Regulation Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii)
This section states that, for purposes of applying the 2% limitation to determine whether the 33 1/3% of-support
test is satisfied or the 10 % support limitation is met, one or more contributions may be excluded from both the
numerator and the denominator of the applicable percent-of-support fraction. The exclusion is generally intended
to apply to substantial contributions or bequests from disinterested parties which:
• are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization;
• are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and
• would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as normally being publicly
supported.
Treasury Regulation Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4)
This section states that all pertinent facts and circumstances will be taken into consideration to determine
whether a particular contribution may be excluded. No single factor will necessarily be determinative. Such
factors may include:
• Whether the contribution was made by a person who;
a. created the organization;
b. previously contributed a substantial part of its support or endowment;
c. stood in a position of authority with respect to the organization, such as a foundation manager within
the meaning of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4946(b);
d. directly or indirectly exercised control over the organization, or;
e. was in a relationship described in IRC Section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1)(G) with someone
listed in bullets a, b, c, or d above.
A contribution made by a person described in bullets a through e is ordinarily given less favorable consideration
than a contribution made by others not described above.
• Whether the contribution was a bequest or an inter vivos transfer. A bequest will ordinarily be given more
favorable consideration than an inter vivos transfer.
• Whether the contribution was in the form of cash, readily marketable securities, or assets which further the
exempt purposes of the organization, such as a gift of a painting to a museum.
• Whether (except in the case of a new organization) prior to the receipt of the particular contribution, the
organization (a) has carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and
(b) has been able to attract a significant amount of public support.
• Whether the organization may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount of public support after
the particular contribution. Continued reliance on unusual grants to fund an organization's current operating
expenses (as opposed to providing new endowment funds) may be evidence that the organization cannot
reasonably be expected to attract future public support.
• Whether, prior to the year in which the particular contribution was received, the organization met the
one-third support test described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any
exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to Treas. Reg. Section 1.509-3(c)(3);
Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y
• Whether the organization has a representative governing body as described in in Treas. Reg. Section
1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i); and
• Whether material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.507-2(a)(7) have
been imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection with such transfer.
Application of Law:
Based on the information provided, the proposed grant meets the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-9
(f)(6)(ii) because the grant is from a disinterested party and:
• The grant was attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of your organization.
• The grant is unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount.
• The grants would by reason of their size adversely affect your organization as normally being publicly
supported.
The grant meets the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) based on the following facts and
circumstances.
• The grant is not being made by a person who created you.
• B has not previously contributed a substantial part or endowment to you. B has not
stood in a position of authority such as a foundation manager within the meaning of IRC Section 4946(b).
• B does not directly or indirectly exercise control over you nor was is in a relationship
described in IRC Section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1)(G)
• The transfer of assets will further your exempt purpose and be used to fund your programs in the future
• You carry on a program to solicit funds to support your activities and reasonably expect to attract public
support after this transfer
• No material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.507-2(a)(7) have been
imposed by the donor
We'll make this determination letter available for public inspection after deleting personally identifiable information,
as required by IRC Section 6110. We've enclosed Letter 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose - Rulings, and a
copy of the letter that shows our proposed deletions.
• If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Letter 437 on how to notify us.
• If you agree with our deletions, you don't need to take any further action.
If you have questions, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter.
Sincerely,
Stephan A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements
Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.