Private Letter Ruling 202346005 Released November 17, 2023 Approved

Partnership may make a late bonus depreciation election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership allocated bonus depreciation to a new partner for a section 743(b) basis adjustment, although the new partner did not intend to claim it. The partnership misunderstood that it could separately elect out of bonus depreciation for that partner's basis-adjustment class and missed the return deadline. The IRS found that the partnership met the standards for discretionary filing relief. It granted 60 days to file a statement electing not to deduct the additional first-year depreciation for that partner's section 743(b) adjustment.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership make a late section 168(k)(7) election out of bonus depreciation for one partner's section 743(b) basis adjustment?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file the election statement
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 168(k)(7), 743(b), 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-2(f), 1.743-1(j), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

 Internal Revenue Service                                      Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

 Number: 202346005                                             Third Party Communication: None
 Release Date: 11/17/2023                                      Date of Communication: Not Applicable
 Index Number: 9100.04-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
 ------------------------------                                ------------------, ID No. -----------------
 ------------                                                  Telephone Number:
 --------------------------------------------                  ---------------------
 ---------------------------                                   Refer Reply To:
 ----------------------------------                            CC:ITA:B07
                                                               PLR-105573-23
                                                               Date: August 16, 2023




Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make the Election Not to Deduct the Additional
First Year Depreciation

LEGEND:

Taxpayer     =            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
X            =            -------------------
Taxable Year =            ------------------------------------------
State        =            -------------
Date1        =            ----------------------------
Date2        =            --------------------------
Date3        =            ---------------------------

Dear --------------------:

       This letter ruling responds to a letter dated February 27, 2023, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted by your representative on behalf of Taxpayer. In that letter,
Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to make the § 168(k)(7) election not to deduct additional first
year depreciation under § 168(k) of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to a specific
partner’s interest for the class of property described in § 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(ii)(G) for the
Taxable Year. This letter ruling is being issued electronically in accordance with Rev.
Proc. 2020-29, 2020-21 I.R.B. 859. A paper copy will not be mailed.

      Unless provided otherwise, all references in this letter ruling to § 168(k) refer to
§ 168(k) as in effect after amendment by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Pub. L. 115-97,
131 Stat. 2054 (December 22, 2017). Further, all references in this letter ruling to §
PLR-105573-23                                2

1.168(k)-2 of the Income Tax Regulations refer to final regulations under § 1.168(k)-2
published in the Federal Register on September 24, 2019 (84 FR 50108).

                                         FACTS

       Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

      Taxpayer, a State limited liability company, is treated as a partnership for Federal
income tax purposes. Taxpayer files a Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income
(Form 1065) on a calendar year basis.

     Taxpayer’s overall method of accounting is the accrual method. The due date of
Taxpayer’s Form 1065 (including extensions) for the Taxable Year was Date1.

       On the last day of the Taxable Year, X purchased an interest in Taxpayer’s
partnership property pursuant to a Purchase Agreement dated Date2. Under the
Purchase Agreement, Taxpayer and X agreed to treat a portion of the purchase as a
contribution of property to the partnership under § 721. As required under the Purchase
Agreement, Taxpayer had in effect an election under § 754 election for the Taxable
Year, allowing a § 743(b) step-up in X’s basis in its interest in the partnership assets as
a result of its purchase.

         X believed that its interest in the partnership assets would be deemed to be
placed in service on or after the first day of the taxable year following the end of the
Taxable Year. However, nine days before Date1, X received a Schedule K-1 from
Taxpayer that reflected the first-year additional depreciation deduction under § 168(k)
for the amount of the § 743(b) basis adjustment for its interest in the partnership assets
for the Taxable Year. Subsequently, on Date3, after X received the Schedule K-1 and
before Date1, X’s representative communicated to Taxpayer that X did not anticipate or
intend (i) to be allocated the additional first year depreciation for the § 743(b)
adjustment for the Taxable Year or (ii) to claim such depreciation for the § 743(b)
adjustment. Prior to Date3, Taxpayer was unaware that X did not anticipate or intend (i)
to be allocated the additional first year depreciation for the § 743(b) adjustment for the
Taxable Year or (ii) to claim such depreciation. However, due to Taxpayer’s
misunderstanding of the application of the § 168(k)(7) election for the class of property
described in § 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(ii)(G), Taxpayer did not make the § 168(k)(7) election
with respect to X’s § 743(b) basis adjustment on the Form 1065 filing for the Taxable
Year by Date1. Several months later, Taxpayer discovered that it could make the §
168(k)(7) election not to deduct the first-year additional depreciation under § 1.168(k)-
2(f)(1)(ii)(G) for the § 743(b) basis adjustment allocated to X for the Taxable Year.
However, Taxpayer was unable to make the § 168(k)(7) election for the Taxable Year
with respect to X’s interest in the partnership property because the extended due date
for filing Taxpayer’s Form 1065 had passed.
PLR-105573-23                                 3


                                   RULING REQUESTED

       Accordingly, Taxpayer requests an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 to
make the § 168(k)(7) election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under §
168(k) with respect to X’s § 743(b) basis adjustment for its interest in the class of
property described in § 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(ii)(G) for the Taxable Year.

                                           LAW

       Section 168(k)(1) allows, for the taxable year in which qualified property is placed
in service, an additional first year depreciation deduction equal to the applicable
percentage of the adjusted basis of that qualified property.

        For qualified property acquired by a taxpayer after September 27, 2017,
§§ 168(k)(6)(A)(i) and (B)(i) provide that the applicable percentage is 100 percent for
qualified property placed in service by the taxpayer after September 27, 2017, and
before January 1, 2023 (before January 1, 2024, for qualified property described in
§ 168(k)(2)(B) and (C)).

        Section 168(k)(7) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the additional
first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service during the taxable year.

       Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(i) provides that if this election is made, the election
applies to all qualified property that is in the same class of property and placed in
service in the same taxable year, and no additional first year depreciation deduction is
allowable for the property placed in service during the taxable year in the class of
property, except as provided in § 1.743-1(j)(4)(i)(B)(1). The term “class of property” is
defined in § 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(ii)(G) as each partner’s basis adjustment in partnership
assets under § 743(b) for each class of property described in § 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(ii)(A)-
(F), and § 1.168(k)-2(f)(2).

         Section 1.743-1(j)(4)(B)(1) provides that a partnership may make an election
under § 168(k)(7) and § 1.168(k)-2(f)(1) not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation for an increase in the basis of qualified property as defined in § 168(k) and
§ 1.168(k)-2, in a class of property as defined in § 1.168(k)-2(f)1)(ii)(A)-(F), and placed
in service in the same taxable year, even if the partnership does not make that election
for all other qualified property of the partnership in the same class of property and
placed in service in the year.

        Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(A) provides that the election not to deduct additional
first year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the
federal tax return for the taxable year in which the qualified property is placed in service
by the taxpayer.
PLR-105573-23                                 4

        Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(B) provides that the election not to deduct additional
first year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562,
“Depreciation and Amortization,” and its instructions. Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(B)
further requires the election for basis adjustments in the partnership assets under §
743(b) to be made by the partnership. The instructions to Form 4562 for the Year
taxable year provide that the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
is made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer's timely filed tax return indicating that
the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation and the class
of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.

       Under § 301.9100-1(a), the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has discretion to
grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and
301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election.

       Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for
making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions
of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-
2.

        Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

                                      CONCLUSION

       Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted an extension of 60 calendar days from the date of this letter ruling
to make the election for X not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under
§ 168(k) for the § 743(b) adjustment for the Taxable Year.

       The election should be made in a written statement indicating that Taxpayer is
electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation with respect to the § 743(b)
basis adjustment in the Taxpayer’s partnership property for the Taxable Year and filed
with the appropriate service center either: (1) to be associated with Taxpayer’s Form
1065, Return of Partnership Income for the Taxable Year, or (2) accompanying Form
8082, Notice of Inconsistent Treatment of Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR),
and any related filings as instructed on Form 8082, as appropriate.

       Additionally, a copy of this letter ruling must be attached to any federal income
tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, a taxpayer filing its federal return
PLR-105573-23                                 5

electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that
provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

        Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code (including other subsections of § 168) Part II, subchapter K of
the Code, or their respective regulations. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or
implied on (1) the year in which X’s interest in the partnership property was placed in
service for purposes of § 168, or the amount of X’s basis in the partnership property; (2)
whether Taxpayer’s interest in any item of depreciable partnership property acquired
under the Purchase Agreement is eligible for the additional first year depreciation
deduction under § 168(k); or (3) whether Taxpayer made a proper election under § 754
for the Taxable Year.

      The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

       This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

      In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter ruling to Taxpayer’s authorized representative. We are also sending a
copy of this letter ruling to the appropriate operating division director.

                                          Sincerely,


                                          ELIZABETH R. BINDER
                                          Senior Counsel, Branch 7
                                          Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                          (Income Tax & Accounting)


Enclosures (2):
  copy of this letter
  6110 copy of letter
PLR-105573-23                                           6


cc: ------------------------------
    -----------------------------
    -----------------------------
    -------------------------

     ---------------------------------
     -----------------------------
     -----------------------------
     -------------------------

     ----------------------------------
     -----------------------------------------------------
     -----------------------------------------
     ----------------------------------
     -----------------------------------------


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.