IRS treats a late Form 8996 as timely, letting an LLC self-certify as a Qualified Opportunity Fund
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF) is an investment vehicle that lets investors defer and potentially reduce tax on capital gains they reinvest in designated low-income "opportunity zones." An entity self-certifies as a QOF by filing Form 8996 with its timely filed tax return. Here an LLC taxed as a partnership was formed to be a QOF, took in capital gains from its member-manager and his spouse, and intended to certify effective a particular month, but a chain of accountant miscommunications and a missed extension meant its Form 8996 was filed with a late partnership return. The taxpayer asked the IRS for relief under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. The IRS found the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith (it relied on its accountants) and that relief would not prejudice the government. Rather than simply extending the deadline, the IRS treated the Form 8996 already attached to the late return as timely filed, so the QOF election is deemed made as of the intended month. The IRS expressed no opinion on whether investments into the fund actually qualify or whether the entity otherwise meets the QOF requirements. This is routine 9100 relief for a missed self-certification.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a fund that filed its Form 8996 with a late return get section 9100 relief so its Qualified Opportunity Fund self-certification is treated as timely?
- Outcome: Approved (late Form 8996 treated as timely; election deemed made)
- Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2(d); Treas. Reg. § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202332008 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 8/11/2023 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.00-00 Person To Contact:
----------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------- --------------------
------------------------ Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------------------- CC:ITA:B05
PLR-122254-22
Date:
May 11, 2023
TY: 2021
TY: 2021
TY: -------
LEGEND
Taxpayer = ------------------------------------------------------
Member-Manager = -----------------------
Member 2 = -----------------------
CPA = ----------------
CPA 2 = ---------------------
CPA 3 = --------------------------
CFO = ----------------
AF 1 = -------------
AF 2 = --------------------------------------
AF 3 = ------------------
State = -------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Month 1 = -----------
Month 2 = --------------
Month 3 = ------
Month 4 = ---------------
Date 1 = -------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = -----------------
Date 4 = -------------------
Date 5 = --------------------------
Date 6 = ---------------------
Date 7 = ---------------------
Date 8 = -----------------------
N1 = ---
N2 = -----
PLR-122254-22 2
L1 = ---
Dear -----------------:
This letter responds to Taxpayer’s request dated Date 1 for an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file a Form 8996,
Qualified Opportunity Fund, for Taxpayer to make an election to self-certify Taxpayer as
a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF) under § 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code) and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations as of Month 2, Year
1.
FACTS
The information and affidavits submitted reflect the following facts.
Taxpayer, a limited liability company classified as a partnership for federal income tax
purposes, was formed pursuant to the laws of State on Date 2. Taxpayer’s limited
liability agreement indicates that Taxpayer and its members intend for Taxpayer to be
organized for the purpose of investing in qualified opportunity zone property and would
make the appropriate elections to become a QOF.
Member-manager owns N1 percent of Taxpayer’s class L1 membership interests, and
he has been one of Taxpayer’s members since Taxpayer’s inception. Member 2, also
an owner of Taxpayer, is the spouse of Member-Manager.
During the N2 years preceding Date 3, AF 1, an accounting firm, served as Member-
Manager’s personal and business income tax return preparer. Effective Date 3, AF 1
merged with AF 2, which created a new accounting firm called AF 3 following the
merger.
In the fall of Year 1, Member-Manager had a telephone conversation with CPA, an
accountant and partner at AF 1, about Member-Manager’s desire to form a QOF to
invest in qualified opportunity zone property. CPA described the mechanics of setting
up and funding a QOF, the benefits of a QOF and related topics, but did not discuss the
procedural requirements to qualify an entity as a QOF for federal tax purposes. At a
later date in Year 1, Member-Manager and CPA had a second telephone conversation
during which they discussed the necessary language to be included in an entity’s
operating agreement to indicate the purpose and intent to qualify as a QOF. They again
did not discuss the procedural requirements for an entity to become a QOF.
CPA 2, a certified public accountant from AF 1, served as Member-Manager’s principal
tax return preparer. During Month 1, Year 2, Member-Manager informed CPA 2 that a
new entity was formed as a QOF in Month 2, Year 1. Member-Manager also indicated
that he opened a bank account for the entity and transferred cash to the entity in Month
2, Year 1. CPA 2 requested that Member-Manager send to CPA 2 the entity’s
PLR-122254-22 3
organizational documents and taxpayer identification number so that a tax return could
be filed for the entity. Member-Manager responded by indicating that the information
would be provided by CFO, the chief financial officer of a business of Member-Manager.
Member-Manager directed CFO to provide the information to CPA 2. At that time, CPA
2 was generally familiar with QOFs, but was not aware of the specific procedures by
which an entity is required to elect to self-certify itself as a QOF.
On Date 4, AF 1 sent an engagement letter to Member-Manager which listed the
federal, state, and local tax returns which AF 1 intended to prepare and file for Member-
Manager’s numerous business entities for the tax year ending Date 5. At the time CPA
2 reviewed and approved the engagement letter, he had not yet received
documentation regarding Taxpayer and did not notice that Taxpayer was not included in
the engagement letter. Member-Manager signed the engagement letter on Date 6, but
inadvertently did not notice that Taxpayer was missing from the list. He promptly
returned the signed engagement letter to AF 1. Member-Manager signed a separate
letter engaging AF 1 to prepare his individual income tax returns for Year 1.
In the early part of Month 3, Year 2, AF 1 calculated the federal income tax liability to be
paid by Member-Manager and Member 2 with their request for an extension of time to
file a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return for Year 1. The tax calculation
included capital gain from sales of stock to third-parties unrelated to Member-Manager
and Manager 2. Upon reviewing the tax calculation furnished by AF 1, Member-
Manager informed CPA 2 that Member-Manager and Member 2 invested funds equal to
the capital gain in Taxpayer in Month 2, Year 1, resulting in the gain being excluded
from Member-Manager’s and Manager 2’s gross income under the rules applicable to
QOFs. While discussing relevant facts with Member-Manager, CPA 2 realized that an
extension of time to file a Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Return of Income for Taxpayer’s
short period ending Date 5 should have been filed by Date 7. Because no extension
request was filed, Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for Year 1 would be filed late. CPA 2 did not
earlier receive the EIN and organizational documents for Taxpayer.
In Month 4, Year 2, AF 1 prepared Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for Year 1 and the draft return
was sent through AF 1’s internal quality review process. The return included a
completed Form 8996 self-certifying Taxpayer as a QOF and identifying Month 2, Year
1 as the first month in which Taxpayer elected to be a QOF. CPA 3, a certified public
accountant, reviewed the draft Form 1065 for Year 1 and noticed that it did not include
an extension of time to file. CPA 3 informed CPA 2 that the Form 8996 included with
Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for Year 1 was required to be filed with a timely filed return
(taking into account extensions) to make the election pursuant to § 1.1400Z2(d)-
1(a)(2)(i) to self-certify Taxpayer as a QOF as of Month 2, Year 1. Because the Form
1065 would be filed late, the election to self-certify Taxpayer as a QOF would not be
valid.
CPA 3 recommended that AF 1 file Taxpayer’s Year 1 Form 1065 with an attached
Form 8996 and then assist Taxpayer in requesting that the Internal Revenue Service
PLR-122254-22 4
(Service) grant an extension of time pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file Form
8996 so that the election would be treated as timely. Member-Manager directed CPA 2
to proceed in accordance with CPA 3’s recommendation.
AF 1 filed Taxpayer’s Year 1 Form 1065 with a completed Form 8996, identifying Month
2, Year 1 as Taxpayer’s first month as a QOF, with the Service on Date 8.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 13823(a) of Public Law 115-97, commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act, added provisions to the Code authorizing taxpayers to defer eligible capital gain
through reinvesting the funds into state-designated population census tracks in low-
income communities, known as Qualified Opportunity Zones. Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A)
of the Code directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations to carry out the statute’s
purposes, including rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of
the Income Tax Regulations provides the rules for an entity to self-certify as a QOF.
Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to be certified as a QOF
must do so annually on a timely filed return in such form and manner as may be
prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the forms or instructions, or in
publications or guidance of the Service, published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 with its tax return for the year
to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the
tax return (including extensions).
Because § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for an entity to self-
certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in § 301.9100-1(b)
of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether
to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-3(a)
provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections, other than
automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2, will be granted when the taxpayer
provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government.
Under § 301.9100-3(b) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, a taxpayer is
deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if, among other circumstances not
relevant here, the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory
election is discovered by the Service, or although exercising reasonable diligence
(taking into account the taxpayer’s experience and the complexity of the return or
issue), the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for an election.
PLR-122254-22 5
A taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably and in good faith pursuant to the
provision in § 301.9100-3(b)(3) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations if the
taxpayer—
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or
could be imposed under § 6662 of the Code at the time the taxpayer requests relief,
and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is
requested;
(ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax
consequences but chose not to make the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service will
not ordinarily grant relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides that
the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of time to make the regulatory
election only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the
granting of relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a
taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the
election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking
into account the time value of money).
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which
the regulatory election should have been made or any taxable year that would have
been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of
limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling
granting relief under this section.
Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. Accordingly, based solely on
the facts and information submitted, and the representations made in the ruling request,
Taxpayer has satisfied the requirements for the granting of relief. Consequently, the
Form 8996 attached to Taxpayer’s return for Year 1, filed with the Service on Date 8 is
considered timely filed and Taxpayer has thereby made the election under § 1400Z-2
and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) to self-certify as a QOF as of Month 2, Year 1. Taxpayer
should submit a copy of this letter ruling to the Service Center where Taxpayer files its
returns along with a cover letter requesting that the Service associate this ruling with the
Year 1 return.
PLR-122254-22 6
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in
§ 1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(34) of the Income Tax Regulations or whether Taxpayer meets the
requirements under § 1400Z-2 of the Code and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF.
We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the
provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or
regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting
from, the instant transaction.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter
ruling.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
Amy J. Pfalzgraf
Branch Chief, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.