Foundation could transfer all assets and terminate without excise tax
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A private foundation planned to consolidate with another foundation controlled by the same trustees by transferring all of its assets without receiving consideration. The IRS ruled that the transfer was a Section 507(b)(2) reorganization and would not itself terminate private foundation status or produce termination tax. The transferor could later terminate with zero Section 507(c) tax if it notified the IRS only after it held no assets. The recipient would inherit the transferor's Section 4940 excess tax and Section 4942 distribution attributes and obligations. Neither the transfer nor reasonable transaction expenses would create net investment income, self-dealing, a jeopardizing investment, or a taxable expenditure. The transferor would file for the transfer year but would not need later Forms 990-PF while it remained assetless and inactive.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could a private foundation transfer all assets to a commonly controlled foundation and then terminate without adverse Chapter 42 consequences?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 507, 4940, 4941, 4942, 4944, 4945; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.507-1, 1.507-3, 1.507-4, 1.507-7; Rev. Rul. 2002-28
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202328004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/14/2023 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 507.00-00, 4940.00-00,
4941.00-00, 4942.00-00, Person To Contact:
4944.00-00, 4945.00-00, ----------------, ID No. -----------------
6033.00-00, 6043.00-00 Telephone Number:
--------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------------------------------- CC:EEE:EOET:EO3
---------------------------------------- PLR-120516-22
------------------------- Date:
April 18, 2023
Transferring Foundation = --------------------------------------------
---------------------
Recipient Foundation = ----------------------------------------
State 1 = --------------
State 2 = ------------
Dear --------------:
This is in response to your letter dated October 14, 2022, in which Transferring
Foundation requested a private letter ruling involving sections 507, 4940, 4941, 4942,
4944, 4945, 6033, and 6043 of the Internal Revenue Code.
BACKGROUND
Both Transferring Foundation and Recipient Foundation (collectively, the
“Foundations”) are recognized as exempt organizations described in section 501(c)(3)
and classified as private foundations under section 509(a). The Foundations are not
operating foundations within the meaning of section 4942(j)(3).
Transferring Foundation was established via trust agreement by its two grantors.
Subsequently, the survivor of the two grantors of Transferring Foundation established
Recipient Foundation. The Foundations make grants to exempt organizations
described in section 501(c)(3) in State 1 and State 2. The Foundations are controlled
by the same two co-trustees and share offices and support staff.
Transferring Foundation and Recipient Foundation would like to consolidate their
operations. The Foundations represent that this would allow them to carry out their
grantmaking activities more effectively because it would simplify their operations,
PLR-120516-22 2
prevent the duplication of effort and expenses related to compliance issues, assist in
managing distribution requirements, provide more consistent cashflow, and lessen the
confusion of potential grantees during the application process.
To carry out this consolidation, Transferring Foundation proposes to initially
transfer substantially all its assets to Recipient Foundation with a reserve retained for
any final expenses, including taxes owed, if any. Once Transferring Foundation
determines and pays its final expenses, the balance of Transferring Foundation’s assets
would be transferred to Recipient Foundation (together with the initial transfer, the
“Asset Transfer”). Transferring Foundation represents that the Asset Transfer will not
be out of current income. Recipient Foundation would not provide any consideration for
Transferring Foundation’s assets. The Foundations represent that the Asset Transfer is
permitted by their respective trust agreements.
Following the Asset Transfer, Transferring Foundation represents that it would
retain no assets and engage in no activities. Transferring Foundation would file a final
Form 990-PF for the year in which it transfers the last of its assets to Recipient
Foundation. Transferring Foundation will notify the Internal Revenue Service (the
“Service”) of its intent to terminate its private foundation status pursuant to section
507(a)(1) no earlier than one day after the transfer of the last of its assets to Recipient
Foundation. The Foundations represent that following the Asset Transfer, Recipient
Foundation will use Transferring Foundation’s assets exclusively in furtherance of its
tax-exempt purposes.
The Foundations represent that the legal, accounting, and other expenses paid
by the Foundations in connection with the Asset Transfer, including the Foundations’
requests for private letter rulings, are reasonable, necessary, and consistent with
ordinary business care and prudence. Additionally, Transferring Foundation represents
that it has not committed any willful repeated acts (or failures to act), nor any willful and
flagrant act (or failure to act), giving rise to liability under chapter 42. Finally,
Transferring Foundation represents that it does not have, and will not have at the time
of the Asset Transfer, any outstanding grants which require expenditure responsibility
under section 4945(d)(4)(B).
RULINGS REQUESTED, LAW, AND ANALYSIS
Requested Ruling 1: The Asset Transfer will qualify as a transfer of assets described in
section 507(b)(2).
Section 507(b)(2) provides that in the case of a transfer of assets of any private
foundation to another private foundation pursuant to any liquidation, merger,
redemption, recapitalization, or other adjustment, organization, or reorganization, the
transferee foundation shall not be treated as a newly created organization.
Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(c)(1) describes the terms “other adjustment, organization,
or reorganization” as including any significant distribution of assets to one or more
PLR-120516-22 3
private foundations, other than transfers for full and adequate consideration or
distributions out of current income. A significant disposition of assets may occur in a
single taxable year or over the course of two or more taxable years. Treas. Reg.
§ 1.507-3(c)(2) defines the term “significant disposition of assets to one or more private
foundations” to include any disposition (or series of related dispositions) where the
aggregate value transferred is 25 percent or more of the fair market value of the net
assets of the transferor foundation at the beginning of the taxable year (or at the
beginning of the first taxable year in which any of a series of related dispositions was
made).
The Asset Transfer will be a significant disposition. Transferring Foundation will
transfer all of its assets to Recipient Foundation and will not receive any consideration
for the amounts transferred. Transferring Foundation represents that the Asset Transfer
will not be out of current income. Accordingly, the Asset Transfer will be a transfer
described in section 507(b)(2). Because the Asset Transfer is described in section
507(b)(2), Recipient Foundation shall not be treated as a newly created organization.
Additionally, Recipient Foundation will be treated as possessing the attributes and
characteristics of Transferring Foundation described in Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(2)-(4).
Requested Ruling 2: The Asset Transfer will not terminate Transferring Foundation’s
private foundation status and will not cause any liability for the termination tax under
section 507(c).
Section 507(a) provides that, except as provided in subsection (b), the status of
any organization as a private foundation shall be terminated only if (1) it notifies the
Secretary of its intent to accomplish such a termination, or (2) with respect to such
organization, there have been either willful repeated acts (or failures to act), or a willful
and flagrant act (or failure to act), giving rise to liability for tax under chapter 42, and the
Secretary notifies such organization that it is liable for the tax imposed by section
507(c), and either such organization pays the tax (or any portion not abated under
section 507(g)) or the entire amount of such tax is abated under section 507(g).
Section 507(c) imposes an excise tax on an organization whose private
foundation status is terminated pursuant to section 507(a) equal to the lower of (1) the
aggregate tax benefit that has resulted from the private foundation’s tax-exempt status
under section 501(c)(3), or (2) the value of the net assets of the foundation.
Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(d) states that unless a private foundation voluntarily gives
notice pursuant to section 507(a)(1), a transfer of assets described in section 507(b)(2)
will not constitute a termination of the transferor’s private foundation status under
section 507(a)(1). See also Treas. Reg. § 1.507-1(b)(6) and Rev. Rul. 2002-28, 2002-1
C.B. 941. Treas. Reg. § 1.507-4(b) states that private foundations that make transfers
described in section 507(b)(2) are not subject to the tax imposed under section 507(c)
with respect to such transfers unless the provisions of section 507(a) become
applicable.
PLR-120516-22 4
Transferring Foundation has not notified the Service of an intent to terminate its
status as a private foundation pursuant to section 507(a)(1), and represents that it will
not do so prior to the completion of the Asset Transfer. Transferring Foundation also
represents that it has not willfully engaged in repeated acts (or failures to act) or
committed a willful and flagrant act (or failure to act) which would give rise to tax under
chapter 42. See section 507(a)(2). The Asset Transfer itself will not constitute such an
act. Since the Asset Transfer is described in section 507(b)(2), and because
Transferring Foundation’s status as a private foundation will otherwise not be
terminated pursuant to section 507(a) prior to the completion of the Asset Transfer, the
Asset Transfer will not terminate Transferring Foundation’s private foundation status
and will not cause any liability under section 507(c). Following the Asset Transfer,
Transferring Foundation will be eligible to voluntarily terminate its private foundation
status through the voluntary termination procedures under section 507(a)(1).
Requested Ruling 3: Transferring Foundation’s voluntary termination after completion of
the Asset Transfer will not result in imposition of tax under section 507(c).
As stated above, section 507(c) imposes an excise tax on an organization whose
private foundation status is terminated pursuant to section 507(a) equal to the lower of
(1) the aggregate tax benefit that has resulted from the private foundation’s tax-exempt
status under section 501(c)(3), or (2) the value of the net assets of the foundation.
Treas. Reg. § 1.507-7(b)(1) states that in the case of a termination under section
507(a)(1), the date referred to in Treas. Reg. § 1.507-7(a)(1), for purposes of
determining the value of net assets, shall be the date on which the terminating
foundation gives the notification described in section 507(a)(1).
Rev. Rul. 2002-28 presents three situations in which a transferor private
foundation transfers all of its assets to one or more transferee private foundations. Rev.
Rul. 2002-28 states that, in each situation presented, if the transferor foundation gives
notice to the Service of its intent to terminate, then the section 507(c) tax applies on the
date such notice is given. Thus, in each situation, if the transferor foundation provides
notice at least one day after it transfers all of its assets, the tax imposed by section
507(c) will be zero.
Transferring Foundation represents that it will notify the Service of its intent to
voluntarily terminate its private foundation status under section 507(a)(1) no earlier than
one day after the completion of the Asset Transfer. Transferring Foundation further
represents that following the Asset Transfer, it will retain no assets. Therefore, as long
as Transferring Foundation has no assets on the date of notification, the tax imposed by
section 507(c) will be zero.
Requested Ruling 4: The transfer will not give rise to any net investment income
pursuant to section 4940.
Section 4940(a) imposes an excise tax on a private foundation's net investment
income for the taxable year. Section 4940(c)(1) defines net investment income as the
PLR-120516-22 5
amount by which the sum of the gross investment income and the capital gain net
income exceeds the deductions allowed under section 4940(c)(3). Section 4940(c)(2)
provides, in part, that for purposes of section 4940, the term “gross investment income”
means the gross amount of income from interest, dividends, rents, payments with
respect to securities loans, and royalties. Section 4940 does not define “capital gain net
income,” but section 4940(c)(1) provides that net investment income is generally
determined under the principles of subtitle A.
Rev. Rul. 2002-28 presents situations where a private foundation transfers all of
its assets to transferee private foundations that are effectively controlled (within the
meaning of the regulations under section 507), directly or indirectly by the same person
who effectively controlled the transferor private foundations. The ruling concludes that
the transfers do not constitute investments of the transferor for purposes of section
4940; therefore, the transfers do not give rise to net investment income subject to tax
under section 4940(a).
As in Rev. Rul. 2002-28, the Asset Transfer does not constitute an investment for
the purposes of section 4940. Accordingly, the proposed Asset Transfer to Recipient
Foundation will not result in the production of net investment income and will not result
in the imposition of tax under section 4940 on Transferring Foundation.
Requested Ruling 5: Recipient Foundation may use any excess tax paid by Transferring
Foundation under section 4940 to offset Recipient Foundation’s tax liability under
section 4940.
Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) states that if a private foundation transfers all of its
net assets to one or more private foundations which are effectively controlled by the
same persons which effectively controlled the transferor private foundation, for
purposes of chapter 42 and sections 507 through 509 such a transferee private
foundation shall be treated as if it were the transferor.
Rev. Rul. 2002-28 holds that where the transferor foundation transfers all of its
assets to one or more private foundations effectively controlled by the same persons
that effectively control the transferor, any excess section 4940 tax paid by the transferor
may be used by the transferee to offset the transferee’s section 4940 tax liability.
Transferring Foundation will transfer all of its assets to Recipient Foundation in
the Asset Transfer. Moreover, both Transferring Foundation and Recipient Foundation
are effectively controlled by the same persons. Therefore, Recipient Foundation may
use any excess tax paid by Transferring Foundation under section 4940 to offset
Recipient Foundation’s tax liability under section 4940.
Requested Ruling 6: The Asset Transfer, and the payment of reasonable expenses to
effect the Asset Transfer, will not be considered self-dealing and will not create any tax
obligation under section 4941.
PLR-120516-22 6
Section 4941(a)(1) imposes taxes on each act of self-dealing between a
disqualified person and a private foundation. Section 4946(a)(1) defines the term
“disqualified person.” Treas. Reg. § 53.4946-1(a)(8) provides that the term “disqualified
person” does not include organizations that are exempt under section 501(c)(3).
In each situation presented in Rev. Rul. 2002-28, the transferee foundations are
recognized as exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) and classified as
private foundations under section 509(a). Rev. Rul. 2002-28 states, in part, that
because the transfers in question are to section 501(c)(3) organizations, which are not
treated as disqualified persons for purposes of section 4941,the transfers do not
constitute self-dealing transactions and are not subject to tax under section 4941(a)(1).
Because Recipient Foundation is recognized by the IRS as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3) and therefore not a disqualified person, the Asset
Transfer (and Transferring Foundation’s payment of reasonable expenses related to the
transaction) will not constitute an act of self-dealing.
Requested Ruling 7: Transferring Foundation’s distributable amount and qualifying
distributions under section 4942 for the tax year in which the Asset Transfer occurs will
be carried over to Recipient Foundation, and Transferring Foundation will not need to
separately meet the qualifying distribution requirements under section 4942 for the tax
year in which the transfer occurs.
Section 4942(a) generally imposes a tax on the undistributed income of a private
foundation for any taxable year which has not been distributed before the first day of the
second (or any succeeding) taxable year following such taxable year. Section 4942(c)
defines “undistributed income” for any taxable year as the amount by which the
distributable amount for such taxable year exceeds the qualifying distributions made out
of such distributable amount for such taxable year. Section 4942(g)(1)(A) defines
“qualifying distribution” generally as any amount (including that portion of reasonable
and necessary administrative expenses) paid to accomplish one or more purposes
described in section 170(c)(2)(B), but a qualifying distribution does not include a
contribution to an organization controlled directly or indirectly by the foundation or by
one or more disqualified persons with respect to the foundation.
Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(5) provides that, except as provided in § 1.507-3(a)(9),
a private foundation making a transfer described in section 507(b)(2) must satisfy its
distribution requirements under section 4942 for the taxable year in which the transfer is
made. As stated above, Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) provides that if a private
foundation transfers all of its net assets to one or more private foundations which are
effectively controlled by the same persons which effectively controlled the transferor
private foundation, for purposes of chapter 42 and sections 507 through 509, such a
transferee private foundation shall be treated as if it were the transferor.
Rev. Rul. 2002-28 holds that where, by reason of Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i),
a transferee private foundation is treated as though it were the transferor for purposes
PLR-120516-22 7
of section 4942, a transfer to the transferee foundation is not treated as a qualifying
distribution of the transferor foundation. Rather, the transferee foundation assumes all
obligations with respect to the transferor's “undistributed income” within the meaning of
section 4942(c), if any, and reduces its own distributable amount under section 4942(d)
by the transferor foundation's excess qualifying distributions under section 4942(i).
Pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i), Recipient Foundation would be
treated as Transferring Foundation for purposes of chapter 42, including section 4942.
Accordingly, the Asset Transfer would not be treated as a qualifying distribution of
Transferring Foundation. Transferring Foundation’s distributable amount and qualifying
distributions under section 4942 for the tax year in which the Asset Transfer occurs will
be carried over to Recipient Foundation. Recipient Foundation will be responsible for
satisfying Transferring Foundation’s remaining distribution requirement for the tax year,
if any, and Transferring Foundation will not need to separately meet the qualifying
distribution requirements under section 4942 for the tax year in which the transfer
occurs.
Requested Ruling 8: The Asset Transfer will not be a jeopardizing investment within the
meaning of section 4944 and will not trigger any tax under section 4944.
Section 4944(a)(1) imposes a tax on any amount invested by a private
foundation in a manner that jeopardizes the carrying out of any of the foundation's
exempt purposes. Neither section 4944 nor the regulations thereunder define “invest”
or “investment.” However, as held in Rev. Rul. 2002-28 in the context of applying
sections 507(b)(2) and 4944 to a transfer of all of a private foundation's assets to one or
more other private foundations that are effectively controlled by the same persons
effectively controlling the transferor foundation, section 507(b)(2) transfers do not
constitute investments for purposes of section 4944. Accordingly, the Asset Transfer
will not constitute a jeopardizing investment and will not be subject to tax under section
4944(a)(1).
Requested Ruling 9: The Asset Transfer will not be a taxable expenditure under section
4945 and no expenditure responsibility requirements must be exercised under section
4945(d)(4) or (h) with respect to the Asset Transfer. The payment of legal, accounting,
and other expenses incurred in connection with the Asset Transfer, including this ruling
request, will also not be taxable expenditures under section 4945.
Section 4945(a) imposes a tax on each “taxable expenditure” of a private
foundation. Section 4945(d)(4) provides that the term “taxable expenditure” includes
any amount paid or incurred by a private foundation as a grant to a private non-
operating foundation unless the grantor foundation exercises expenditure responsibility
with respect to such grant in accordance with section 4945(h).
Treas. Reg. § 53.4945-6(c)(3) allows a private foundation to transfer its assets to
exempt organizations described in section 501(c)(3), including private foundations,
pursuant to section 507(b)(2), without the transfers being taxable expenditures under
PLR-120516-22 8
section 4945(d)(5). As discussed, Treas. Reg. § 1.507-3(a)(9)(i) provides that if a
private foundation transfers all of its net assets to one or more private foundations which
are effectively controlled by the same person or persons which effectively controlled the
transferor private foundation, for purposes of chapter 42 and sections 507 through 509
such a transferee private foundation shall be treated as if it were the transferor. Rev.
Rul. 2002-28 provides that because each transferor foundation transfers all of its assets
to private foundations effectively controlled by the same persons that effectively control
the transferor foundation, the transferee foundations are treated as if they were the
transferor for purposes of section 4945. Because the transferee foundations are treated
as though they were the transferor foundation rather than as recipients of expenditure
responsibility grants, there are no expenditure responsibility requirements under section
4945 that must be exercised with respect to the Asset Transfer to Recipient Foundation
and the Asset Transfer will not be a taxable expenditure.
Treas. Reg. § 53.4945-6(b)(2) provides that legal, administrative, and other
expenses incurred by a private foundation are not taxable expenditures if the foundation
can demonstrate that such expenses were paid or incurred in the good faith belief that
they were reasonable and that the payment or incurrence of such expenses in such
amounts was consistent with ordinary business care and prudence. The Foundations
represent that the legal, accounting, and other expenses paid in connection with this
ruling request and in effectuating the proposed transfer are reasonable, necessary, and
consistent with ordinary business care and prudence. Therefore, these payments will
also not constitute taxable expenditures under section 4945.
Requested Ruling 10: Transferring Foundation will not be required to file Form 990-PF
for any taxable year following the taxable year in which the Asset Transfer concludes.
Treas. Reg. § 1.507-1(b)(9) states that a private foundation which transfers all of
its net assets is required to file the annual information return required by section 6033,
and the foundation managers are required to file the annual report of a private
foundation required by section 6056, for the taxable year in which such transfer occurs.
However, neither such foundation nor its foundation managers will be required to file
such returns for any taxable year following the taxable year in which the last of any such
transfers occurred, if at no time during the subsequent taxable years in question the
foundation has either legal or equitable title to any assets or engages in any activity.
See also Rev. Rul. 2002-28.
Therefore, Transferring Foundation will not be required to file Form 990-PF for
any taxable year subsequent to the taxable year in which the Asset Transfer occurs, as
long as it has no assets and engages in no activity.
RULINGS
Based on the foregoing, and assuming the accuracy of the facts and representations
set forth herein, we rule as follows:
PLR-120516-22 9
1) The Asset Transfer will qualify as a transfer of assets described in section
507(b)(2).
2) The Asset Transfer will not terminate Transferring Foundation’s private
foundation status and will not cause any liability for the termination tax under
section 507(c).
3) Transferring Foundation’s voluntary termination after completion of the Asset
Transfer will not result in imposition of tax under section 507(c).
4) The transfer will not give rise to any net investment income pursuant to section
4940.
5) Recipient Foundation may use any excess tax paid by Transferring Foundation
under section 4940 to offset Recipient Foundation’s tax liability under section
4940.
6) The Asset Transfer, and the payment of reasonable expenses to effect the Asset
Transfer, will not be considered self-dealing and will not create any tax obligation
under section 4941.
7) Transferring Foundation’s distributable amount and qualifying distributions under
section 4942 for the tax year in which the Asset Transfer occurs will be carried
over to Recipient Foundation, and Transferring Foundation will not need to
separately meet the qualifying distribution requirements under section 4942 for
the tax year in which the transfer occurs.
8) The Asset Transfer will not be a jeopardizing investment within the meaning of
section 4944 and will not trigger any tax under section 4944.
9) The Asset Transfer will not be a taxable expenditure under section 4945 and no
expenditure responsibility requirements must be exercised under section
4945(d)(4) or (h) with respect to the Asset Transfer. The payment of legal,
accounting, and other expenses incurred in connection with the Asset Transfer,
including this ruling request, will also not be taxable expenditures under section
4945.
10) Transferring Foundation will not be required to file Form 990-PF for any taxable
year following the taxable year in which the Asset Transfer concludes.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by or on behalf of Transferring Foundation and accompanied
by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an individual with authority to bind
Transferring Foundation, and upon the understanding that there will be no material
changes in the facts. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for a ruling, it is subject to verification on examination. The
Associate office will revoke or modify a letter ruling and apply the revocation
retroactively if there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts; the facts
at the time of the transaction are materially different from the controlling facts on which
the ruling was based; or, in the case of a transaction involving a continuing action or
series of actions, the controlling facts change during the course of the transaction. See
Rev. Proc. 2023-1, section 11.05.
This letter does not address the applicability of any section of the Code or
Regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections specifically
PLR-120516-22 10
described, and, except as expressly provided in this letter, no opinion is expressed or
implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspects of any transaction or item of
income discussed or referenced in this letter.
Because it could help resolve questions concerning federal income tax status,
this letter should be kept in Transferring Foundation's permanent records.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, if Transferring Foundation files a return electronically, this requirement
may be satisfied by attaching a statement to the return that provides the date and
control number of this letter.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to Transferring Foundation's authorized representative.
This ruling letter is directed only to Transferring Foundation. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
Nathanael DeJonge
Senior Technician Reviewer
Office of the Chief Counsel
(Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations,
and Employment Taxes)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.