Chief Counsel Advice 202326019 Released June 30, 2023 Advice

Debt-limit conversion of Demand Deposit SLGS preserves arbitrage treatment

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

During a federal debt-limit suspension, Treasury regulations converted outstanding Demand Deposit State and Local Government Series securities into special 90-day certificates of indebtedness. Issuers had used the Demand Deposit SLGS either to satisfy the continuous-investment safe harbor for longer-term working-capital financing or to avoid holding higher-yielding investments. The IRS advised that, under the stated facts, Section 1.148-10(g) permitted the special certificates to be treated as Demand Deposit SLGS for the suspension period. The conversion therefore did not break the working-capital safe harbor's continuous-investment requirement. It also did not cause replacement proceeds to lose their treatment as invested in tax-exempt bonds when the special certificates were reinvested in Demand Deposit SLGS after issuance resumed.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the debt-limit conversion of Demand Deposit SLGS into special 90-day Treasury certificates disrupt the working-capital safe harbor or tax-exempt-bond treatment?
  • Outcome: advice given; neither treatment is lost under the stated facts
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 103, 148; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.148-1(c)(4), 1.148-10(g), 1.150-1(b); 31 C.F.R. § 344.7(b)

Full text (IRS public release)

           Office of Chief Counsel
           Internal Revenue Service
           Memorandum
           Number: 202326019
           Release Date: 6/30/2023
           CC:FIP:05 ------------                                Third Party Communication: None
           POSTF-110464-23                                       Date of Communication: Not Applicable

 UILC:     148.00-00

  date:    June 08, 2023

     to:   ----------------------
           --------------------------------------------
           (TEGE Division Counsel)

  from:    ------------------------------
           ---------------------------------------------------
           (Financial Institutions & Products)


subject:   Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum

           This memorandum responds to your request for assistance. This advice may not be
           used or cited as precedent.

           ISSUES

               (1) Does the conversion of an issuer’s U.S. Treasury Securities – State and Local
                   Government Series Demand Deposit securities (Demand Deposit SLGS) to
                   special 90-day certificates of indebtedness (Special 90-day C of I) pursuant to 31
                   CFR § 344.7(b) cause the issuer to fail to meet the continuous investment
                   requirement of the safe harbor for longer-term working capital financings under
                   § 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(C) of the Income Tax Regulations under the facts described
                   below?1

               (2) Does an issuer’s investment in Demand Deposit SLGS lose its status as a tax-
                   exempt bond under § 1.150-1(b) when there is a conversion of the Demand
                   Deposit SLGS to Special 90-day C of I pursuant to 31 CFR § 344.7(b), if the
                   Special 90-day C of I are reinvested in Demand Deposit SLGS when the
                   issuance of Demand Deposit SLGS resumes?




           1  Unless otherwise specified, all “section” or “§” references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code
           or the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1).
POSTF-110464-23                              2

CONCLUSIONS

   (1) Under the facts described below, the conversion does not cause the issuer to fail
       to meet the continuous investment requirement of the safe harbor for longer-term
       working capital financings.
   (2) The conversion does not cause the issuer’s investment to lose its status as a tax-
       exempt bond.

FACTS

Situation 1

Issuer A invested its available amounts (as defined for purposes of § 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)) in
Demand Deposit SLGS, thereby meeting the requirements of the safe harbor against
the creation of replacement proceeds for longer-term working capital financings
provided in § 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii). On Date 1, Issuer A’s Demand Deposit SLGS were
converted, pursuant to 31 CFR § 344.7(b), into Special 90-day C of I. On Date 2, the
issuance of Demand Deposit SLGS resumed, and the Special 90-day C of I were
reinvested in Demand Deposit SLGS.

Situation 2

Issuer B invested replacement proceeds (as defined in § 1.148-1(c)) in Demand Deposit
SLGS for the purpose of avoiding acquisition of higher yielding investments as defined
in § 148(b). On Date 1, Issuer B’s Demand Deposit SLGS were converted, pursuant to
31 CFR § 344.7(b), into Special 90-day C of I. On Date 2, the issuance of Demand
Deposit SLGS resumed, and the Special 90-day C of I were reinvested in Demand
Deposit SLGS.

LAW

Section 103(a) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that, except as provided in
§ 103(b), gross income does not include interest on any state or local bond. Section
103(b) provides, in part, that § 103(a) shall not apply to any arbitrage bond (within the
meaning of § 148).

Section 148(a) defines an arbitrage bond as any bond issued as part of an issue any
portion of the proceeds of which are reasonably expected (at the time of issuance of the
bond) to be used directly or indirectly (1) to acquire higher yielding investments, or (2) to
replace funds which were used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding
investments. Section 148(a) further provides that a bond is an arbitrage bond if the
issuer intentionally uses any portion of the proceeds of the issue of which such bond is
a part in a manner described in (1) or (2).

Section 148(b)(1) provides that the term “higher yielding investments” means
any investment property which produces a yield over the term of the issue which is
POSTF-110464-23                               3

materially higher than the yield on the issue. Section 148(b)(3)(A) provides that, except
as provided in § 148(b)(3)(B), the term “investment property” does not include any tax-
exempt bond. Section 148(b)(3)(B) provides that with respect to an issue other than an
issue a part of which is a specified private activity bond (as defined in § 57(a)(5)(C), the
term “investment property” includes a specified private activity bond (as so defined).

Section 1.150-1(b) provides that, for purposes of § 148, tax-exempt bond includes a
certificate of indebtedness issued by the United States Treasury pursuant to the
Demand Deposit State and Local Government Series program described in 31 CFR part
344.

Section 1.148-2(a) provides, in part that under § 148(a), the direct or indirect investment
of gross proceeds of an issue in higher yielding investments causes the bonds of the
issue to be arbitrage bonds.

Section 1.148-1(b) defines “gross proceeds” to mean any proceeds and replacement
proceeds of an issue. Section 1.148-1(c) provides the definition of replacement
proceeds. Section 1.148-1(c)(1) provides, in part, that replacement proceeds include,
but are not limited to, sinking funds, pledged funds, and other replacement proceeds
described in § 1.148-1(c)(4), to the extent that those funds or amounts are held by or
derived from a substantial beneficiary of the issue.

Section 1.148-1(c)(4)(i)(A) provides that replacement proceeds arise to the extent that
the issuer reasonably expects as of the issue date that: (1) the term of an issue will be
longer than is reasonably necessary for the governmental purposes of the issue; and
(2) there will be available amounts during the period that the issue remains outstanding
longer than necessary. Whether an issue is outstanding longer than necessary is
determined under § 1.148-10. Replacement proceeds are created under § 1.148-
1(c)(4)(i)(A) at the beginning of each fiscal year during which an issue remains
outstanding longer than necessary in an amount equal to available amounts of the
issuer as of that date.

Section 1.148-1(c)(4)(i)(B)(4) provides, as a safe harbor, that replacement proceeds do
not arise under § 1.148-1(c)(4)(i)(A) for the portion of an issue (including a refunding
issue) that is to be used to finance working capital expenditures, if that portion satisfies
§ 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii). Section 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii) provides a safe harbor for longer-term
working capital financings. Section 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(A) and (B) generally require annual
testing for available amounts and application of the available amounts to redeem or to
invest in eligible tax-exempt bonds (as defined in § 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(E)).

Section 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(C) provides that, except as provided in § 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(C),
any amounts invested in eligible tax-exempt bonds under § 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(B) must be
invested continuously in such tax-exempt bonds to the extent provided in § 1.148-
1(c)(4)(ii)(D). Section 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(C)(1) provides that amounts previously invested
in eligible tax-exempt bonds under § 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(B) that are held for not more than
POSTF-110464-23                              4

30 days in a fiscal year pending reinvestment in eligible tax-exempt bonds are treated
as invested in eligible tax-exempt bonds.

Section 1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(E) provides that eligible tax-exempt bonds means (1) a bond
the interest on which is excludable from gross income under § 103 and that is not a
specified private activity bond subject to alternative minimum tax, (2) an interest in a
regulated investment company to the extent that at least 95 percent of the income to the
holder of the interest on a bond that is excludable from gross income under § 103 and
that is not interest on a specified private activity bond subject to the alternative tax; or
(3) a certificate of indebtedness issued by the United States Treasury pursuant to the
Demand Deposit State and Local Government Series program described in 31 CFR part
344.

Section 1.148-10(g) provides that, notwithstanding any specific provision in §§ 1.148-
1 through 1.148-11, the Commissioner may prescribe extensions of temporary periods,
larger reasonably required reserve or replacement funds, or consequences of failures or
remedial action under § 148 in lieu of or in addition to other consequences of those
failures, or take other action, if the Commissioner finds that good faith or similar
circumstances so warrant, consistent with the purposes of § 148.

Section 344.7(b) of the regulations governing State and Local Government Series
(SLGS) securities, 31 CFR Part 344, provides that at any time the Secretary determines
that issuance of obligations sufficient to conduct the orderly financing operations of the
United States cannot be made without exceeding the statutory debt limit, any
unredeemed Demand Deposit securities will be invested in special 90-day certificates of
indebtedness. Funds invested in the 90-day certificates of indebtedness earn simple
interest equal to the daily factor in effect at the time Demand Deposit security issuance
is suspended, multiplied by the number of days outstanding. When regular Treasury
borrowing operations resume, the 90-day certificates of indebtedness, at the owner’s
option, are payable at maturity, redeemable before maturity, provided funds are
available for redemption, or reinvested in Demand Deposit securities.

ANALYSIS

Situation 1

After the conversion of Issuer A’s Demand Deposit SLGS into the Special 90-day C of I,
Issuer A’s available amounts were no longer invested in eligible tax-exempt bonds.
Based on the facts and circumstances, we conclude that the application of § 1.148-
10(g) is appropriate and we will treat the Special 90-day C of I as Demand Deposit
SLGS for the period during which the issuance of Demand Deposit SLGS was
suspended. Therefore, the conversion does not cause Issuer A to fail to meet the
continuous investment requirement of the safe harbor for longer-term working capital
financings.

Situation 2
POSTF-110464-23                            5


After the conversion of Issuer B’s Demand Deposit SLGS into the Special 90-day C of I,
Issuer B’s replacement proceeds were no longer invested in tax-exempt bonds.
Nonetheless, based on the facts and circumstances, we conclude that the application
of § 1.148-10(g) is appropriate and we will treat the Special 90-day C of I as Demand
Deposit SLGS for the period during which the issuance of Demand Deposit SLGS was
suspended. Therefore, the conversion does not cause Issuer B’s investment to lose its
status as a tax-exempt bond.

Please call (202) 317-6980 if you have any further questions.


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.