IRS grants 120 extra days to make a late QSub election for a subsidiary the taxpayer forgot to elect

Number
202325006
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary; Election by Small Business Corporation; Inadvertent Terminations; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 1361
Ruling dated
March 28, 2023
Publicly released
June 23, 2023

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation (X) acquired a chain of companies. One of them (Sub 1) was itself an S corporation that owned a lower-tier company (Sub 2) treated as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary, or QSub. When X bought Sub 1, it timely filed a QSub election for Sub 1 but, by oversight, never filed the required QSub election for Sub 2. X asked the IRS for relief under the "9100" regulations, which let the IRS grant more time to make a missed election. The IRS agreed, finding that the failure was inadvertent, that X acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief would not harm the government. X gets 120 days from the letter's date to file Form 8869 for Sub 2. This matters because a QSub is ignored as a separate corporation for tax purposes, so fixing the missed election keeps the whole structure taxed as one S corporation as intended.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the taxpayer get a late-election extension under § 301.9100-3 to file a QSub election for Sub 2?
  • Outcome: Approved (120-day extension granted)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1361(b)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-3; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202325006
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/23/2023
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1361.05-00, 1362.00-00,
1362.04-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------, ID No. ---------------- ----------------------------------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
--------------------------
--------------------
------------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-118831-22
Date:
March 28, 2023

LEGEND

X = ------------------------------------------
EIN: ----------------

Sub 1 = -------------------------------
EIN: ----------------

Sub 2 = ---------------------------------
EIN: ----------------

Date 1 = ------------------

Date 2 = -----------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------

Date 4 = ------------------

Date 5 = ------------------

Date 6 = ------------------

State = ---------

Dear ----------------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated September 23, 2022, and additional correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting relief under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration regulations to make a late election for Sub 2 under § 1361 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

FACTS

According to the information submitted, Sub 1 was organized under the laws of State on Date 1, and made an election to be an S corporation as of formation. Sub 2 was organized under the laws of State on Date 2. On Date 3, Sub 1 acquired Sub 2 and filed an election to treat Sub 2 as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) of Sub 2 as of Date 3.

X was organized under the laws of State on Date 4 and made an election to be an S corporation as of formation. On Date 5, X acquired Sub 1 and intended to file elections to treat Sub 1 and Sub 2 as QSubs effective Date 6. X filed a timely election to treat Sub 1 as a QSub of X. However, due to inadvertence, X failed to timely file a QSub election on behalf of Sub 2 to be effective Date 6.

X represents that its failure to file a QSub election for Sub 2 was inadvertent and not the result of tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X further represents that no federal tax return of any person has been filed inconsistent with a valid QSub election having been made for Sub 2 effective Date 6. X, Sub 1 and Sub 2 have agreed to make any adjustments required by the Service consistent with the treatment of Sub 2 as a QSub.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(b)(3)(A) provides that, except as provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary, for purposes of the Code (i) a corporation which is a QSub shall not be treated as a separate corporation, and (ii) all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a QSub shall be treated as assets, liabilities, and such items (as the case may be) of the S corporation.

Section 1361(b)(3)(B) provides that the term "QSub" means any domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation (as defined in § 1361(b)(2)), if (i) 100 percent of the stock of such corporation is held by the S corporation, and (ii) the S corporation elects to treat such corporation as a QSub.

Section 1.1361-3(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the corporation for which a QSub election is made must meet all the requirements of § 1361(b)(3)(B) at the time the election is made and for all periods for which the election is to be effective.

Section 1.1361-3(a)(6) provides that an extension of time to make a QSub election may be available under procedures applicable under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for making certain elections.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory extensions that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely upon the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100 have been satisfied. Accordingly, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to file Form 8869, Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary Election, with the appropriate service center on behalf of Sub 2 effective Date 6. A copy of this letter should be attached to each Form 8869.

Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal income tax consequences of the facts under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion on whether X met the definition of an S corporation under § 1361(b)(1) or whether Sub 1 or Sub 2 met the definition of a QSub under § 1361(b)(3).

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

By: __/s/________
Laura C. Fields
Branch Chief, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosure (1):
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace