Private Letter Ruling 202322012 Released June 2, 2023 Approved

IRS grants extra time to make a late section 754 partnership basis-adjustment election after a partner died

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A general partnership had a partner who died owning roughly a certain
percentage of the firm. When a partnership interest changes hands (including on
a partner's death), a "section 754 election" lets the partnership adjust the tax
basis of its assets so the new owner's inside basis matches what they paid, a
choice that usually helps by unlocking extra depreciation or reducing later
gain. The partnership meant to make the election for that year but missed the
filing deadline. It asked for "9100 relief," a discretionary extension under
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. The IRS granted 120 days to make the election
effective for that year and later years. The relief comes with conditions: the
partnership and its partners must go back and make all the basis adjustments
(and any extra deductions) that would have applied had the election been timely,
even for years otherwise closed by the statute of limitations, and must file an
administrative adjustment request (Form 8082) if needed to amend the return.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership get a late extension under Treas. Reg.
    § 301.9100-3 to make a section 754 election it intended, but failed, to file
    on time?
  • Outcome: Approved. 120-day extension granted, subject to conforming
    basis adjustments by the partnership and its partners.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 754 (with §§ 734(b), 743(b)); Treas. Reg.
    §§ 1.754-1, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; § 6227(b) (AAR).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202322012 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/2/2023 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.15-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ --------------------
------------------------ Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------------------- CC:PSI:01
PLR-117381-22
Date:
March 06, 2023

                                                LEGEND

X = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Decedent = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

n = ----------

State = ----------------

Date 1 = -------------------------

Date 2 = -------------------

Year = -------

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated September 7, 2022, submitted on behalf of X by its
authorized representative, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal
Revenue Code ("Code").

                                                 FACTS

The information submitted states that X was organized as a general partnership under the
laws of State on Date 1. X is classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes.

On Date 2, Decedent died owning approximately an n% interest in X. X represents that it
intended to make a § 754 election for its Year taxable year and thereafter. However, X
inadvertently failed to timely file a § 754 election to adjust the basis of X's partnership
property for its Year taxable year.

                                LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 754 of the Code provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in
accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership
property is adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in
§ 734, and, in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in
§ 743. Such election applies with respect to all distributions of property by the
partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year
with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an election
under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b) with
respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a
partnership, shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the
taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid,
the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including
extensions thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.

Section 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides that
the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory
election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a
taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term "regulatory election" includes an election
whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for making
certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will use
to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do not
meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides
evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

                                  CONCLUSION

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a
result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make
an election under § 754 effective for its Year taxable year and thereafter. The election
should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center either (1)
to be associated with X's Year partnership tax return, or (2) accompanying Form 8082,
Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR), and any
related filings as instructed in Form 8082, as appropriate. A copy of this letter should be
attached to the relevant filing.

This ruling is contingent on X's relevant filing(s) containing adjustments to the basis of
X's properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been
made if the § 754 election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect
any additional deductions for the recovery of basis related to X's property that would
have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether
the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired
for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any deductions for the recovery of basis
allowable for an open year are to be computed based on the remaining useful life or
recovery period and using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any such
deductions allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely
made.

If the partnership is required to file an AAR in order to properly amend a partnership tax
return, then this ruling is also contingent on X filing Form 8082 and taking into account
the adjustments as required by § 6227(b).

Additionally, the partner(s) of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to reflect
what that basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of
whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has
expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partner(s) of X
must reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional deductions
for the recovery of basis related to X's property that would have been allowable if the
§ 754 election had been timely made.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                               Sincerely,

                                               Holly Porter
                                               Associate Chief Counsel
                                               (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



                                          By: Jennifer N. Keeney
                                              Jennifer N. Keeney
                                              Senior Counsel, Branch 1
                                              Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                              (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.