IRS forgives an inadvertent S corporation termination after a conversion put shares in an ineligible partnership
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A company was formed as a corporation and elected S corporation status. Later it converted from a state corporation into a state limited partnership and elected (on Form 8832) to still be taxed as a corporation, treating the change as an "F reorganization" so it could keep its S status. Two problems arose. First, shares ended up held by a partnership, and a partnership is not an eligible S corporation shareholder. Second, converting into a limited partnership may have created a prohibited second class of stock. Either issue would terminate the S election. Once the company caught the mistakes, it fixed them: the partnership shareholder converted into a disregarded entity, and the company itself became an LLC. The company said the termination was inadvertent and not tax-motivated, and everyone had filed as if it were still an S corporation. The IRS granted relief under Code section 1362(f), treating the company as continuing to be an S corporation from the conversion date, as long as it and its shareholders file original and amended returns consistent with that treatment.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Was the termination of the company's S corporation status
(ineligible partnership shareholder, and a possible second class of stock after conversion) inadvertent and eligible for relief under IRC § 1362(f)? - Outcome: Approved. Treated as an S corporation from the conversion date,
contingent on filing consistent original and amended returns. - Key authorities: IRC §§ 1362(f), 1362(d)(2), 1361(b)(1);
§ 368(a)(1)(F) (F reorganization).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202322010
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/2/2023
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.00-00, 1362-01.00,
1362.02-00, 1362.02-02,
Person To Contact:
1362-04.00
--------------------------, ID No. ----------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------------- --------------------
-------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------
CC:PSI:B01
--------------------------
PLR-117295-22
------------------------------
Date:
March 9, 2023
LEGEND
X = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
A = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = ----------------
Date 3 = ---------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------
State = --------
Dear --------------:
This responds to a letter dated September 7, 2022 submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting relief under section 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
FACTS
According to the information submitted and representations within, X was formed under the laws of State on Date 1 as a corporation. X elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 1. On Date 2, X converted from a State corporation to a State limited partnership, and filed a Form 8832, Entity Classification Election, to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation effective Date 2. X represents that the conversion qualified as a reorganization under § 368(a)(1)(F) and X therefore continued as an S corporation. On Date 2, shares in X were transferred to A, a partnership.
A, as a partnership, was an ineligible shareholder of an S corporation. Additionally, the conversion on Date 2 to a State limited partnership may have created a second class of stock in violation of the one class of stock requirement under § 1361(b)(1)(D), thereby possibly causing X's S corporation election to terminate. On Date 3, the shareholders of X took remedial action by having A convert to an entity disregarded as separate from its owner. Additionally, X has converted to a limited liability company effective Date 4.
X represents that the termination of its S corporation status was inadvertent and was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X represents that all shareholders filed their returns consistent with X being an S corporation. Further, X represents that X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required as a condition of obtaining relief for the termination of X's election as provided under
§ 1362(f) of the Code that may be required by the Secretary.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1361(a)(1) of the Code provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for such year.
Section 1361(b)(1) defines a "small business corporation" as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than 1 class of stock.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated whenever the corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.
Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the election was made or termination occurred is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation for which the election was made or termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that if X's conversion from a State corporation to a State limited partnership on Date 2 did create a second class of stock, the consequent termination of X's S corporation election was inadvertent within the meaning of 1362(f). We further conclude X's S corporation status terminated within the meaning of § 1362(f) on Date 2 because A was an ineligible shareholder. Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from Date 2 and thereafter, provided X's S corporation election is otherwise effective and not terminated under § 1362(d).
This letter ruling is contingent upon X and its shareholders filing any original and amended returns for all open taxable years consistent with the relief granted in this letter. If this condition is not met, then this ruling is null and void.
Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X's eligibility to be an S corporation.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to § 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
/s/
Joy C. Spies
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace