Private Letter Ruling 202316005 Released April 21, 2023 Approved

Partnership received 120 days to make a late GILTI high-tax exclusion election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership that owned a controlled foreign corporation wanted to make the GILTI high-tax exclusion election for an earlier tax year. Its accounting firm prepared an administrative adjustment request but incorrectly advised that the filing deadline was 18 months later than the regulatory deadline. The partnership relied on that advice and sought relief before the IRS discovered the missed election. Based on representations that the election did not use hindsight, affected years remained open, and aggregate tax would not be reduced below the timely-election result, the IRS granted 120 days to file the election with an administrative adjustment request.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the partnership make a late GILTI high-tax exclusion election for its controlled foreign corporation?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a 120-day extension
  • Key authorities: IRC § 951A; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.951A-2(c)(7), 1.964-1(c), 301.6227-1, and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202316005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/21/2023 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 9100.22-00,
951A.00-00, 951A.02-00 Person To Contact:
------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------- --------------------
--------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------- CC:INTL:B02
PLR-118120-22
Date:
January 23, 2023

      TY:

X = ----------------------------------------------------------------
Disregarded Entity = ------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual A = ----------------------------------------------------
S corporation = ---------------------------------------------------
Y = ------------------------------
Tax Year 1 = ------------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------------
Date 5 = -------------------

Dear ---------------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated September 12, 2022, submitted on behalf of X by
its authorized representatives, requesting an extension of time under §301.9100-3 of
the Procedure and Administration Regulations for X to file a global intangible low-taxed
income (GILTI) high-tax exclusion election (GILTI HTE Election) under §1.951A-
2(c)(7)(viii) with respect to Y, X’s controlled foreign corporation (as defined in section
957(a)) (a CFC), for the CFC inclusion year (as defined in Treas. Reg. §1.951A-1(f)(1))
that ends with or within X’s U.S. shareholder inclusion year (as defined in Treas. Reg.
§1.951A-1(f)(7)), Tax Year 1.

FACTS

X is a partnership with two partners—Disregarded Entity and S corporation. Individual
A is the sole owner of Disregarded Entity and the sole shareholder of S corporation. X
is the sole owner and the controlling domestic shareholder (as defined in Treas. Reg.
§1.964-1(c)(5)) of Y. X engaged an accounting firm to prepare its Tax Year 1 Form

PLR-118120-22 2

1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income. X timely filed its Form 1065 on Date 1. X’s
originally filed Form 1065 did not make the GILTI HTE Election under Treas. Reg.
§1.951A-2(c)(7). After Date 1 but before Date 2, the regulatory deadline to file the
retroactive GILTI HTE Election, X contacted the accounting firm and inquired as to why
the GILTI HTE had not been made for X on the originally filed Form 1065 and instructed
the accounting firm to prepare and file the necessary forms to retroactively make the
GILTI HTE Election for X for Tax Year 1. The accounting firm prepared the initial draft
of the AAR forms to make the GILTI HTE Election, but the AAR forms were not filed at
that time. On Date 3, the accounting firm incorrectly advised X that the AAR electing
the GILTI HTE Election was not due until Date 4 (the date three years after the
extended due date for X’s original tax return for Tax Year 1), which was 18-months after
Date 2 (the regulatory deadline to file the retroactive GILTI HTE Election). X relied on
the accounting firm’s advice as to the election, which was given by tax professionals
with substantial experience in sophisticated tax matters and who were familiar with X’s
circumstances.

Shortly after Date 2, the AAR had still not been filed and the accounting firm discovered
that the deadline to file the AAR had passed. The accounting firm informed X that its
GILTI HTE Election would be late.

X is not currently under examination for Tax Year 1, or any other year in which the
election is relevant. X represents that granting the relief requested will not result in X
having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all affected years than X would have had
if the election had been timely made. X represents that no facts have changed that
would indicate the use of hindsight and the election would have been beneficial from the
beginning. Further, X represents that each of X’s affected tax years remain open for
assessment as of the date of this letter.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 951A(a) provides that a U.S. shareholder of any CFC for any taxable year of the
U.S. shareholder must include in gross income the shareholder’s GILTI for that taxable
year.

Section 951A(b) provides that the term GILTI means, with respect to any U.S.
shareholder for any taxable year of such U.S. shareholder, the excess (if any) of such
shareholder’s net CFC tested income for such taxable year, over such shareholder’s net
deemed tangible income return for such taxable year.

Section 951A(c)(1) generally provides that the term “net CFC tested income” means,
with respect to any U.S. shareholder for any taxable year of such U.S. shareholder, the
excess (if any) of the aggregate of such shareholder’s pro rata share of the tested
income of each CFC with respect to which such shareholder is a U.S. shareholder for
such taxable year of such U.S. shareholder, over the aggregate of such shareholder’s
pro rata share of the tested loss of each CFC with respect to which such shareholder is
a U.S. shareholder for such taxable year of such U.S. shareholder.

PLR-118120-22 3

Section 951A(c)(2)(A) provides that the term “tested income” means, with respect to any
CFC for any taxable year of such CFC, the excess (if any) of the gross income of such
corporation determined without regard to certain items of income, including any gross
income excluded from the foreign base company income (as defined in section 954)
and the insurance income (as defined in section 953) of such corporation by reason of
section 954(b)(4), over the deductions (including taxes) properly allocable to such gross
income under rules similar to the rules of section 954(b)(5) (or to which such deductions
would be allocable if there were such gross income).

Section 1.951A-2(c)(7)(i) generally provides that for purposes of determining the tested
income of a CFC, a tentative gross tested income item (determined under §1.951A-
2(c)(7)(ii)(A)) qualifies for the exception described in section 954(b)(4) only if a GILTI
HTE Election is effective with respect to the CFC for the CFC inclusion year (as defined
in §1.951A-1(f)(1)) and the tentative tested income item with respect to the tentative
gross tested income item was subject to an effective rate of foreign tax that is greater
than 90 percent of the maximum rate of tax specified in section 11.

Section 1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii) provides that the GILTI HTE Election is made by the
controlling domestic shareholder with respect to a CFC for a CFC inclusion year by filing
the statement required under §1.964-1(c)(3)(ii) with a timely filed original federal income
tax return, or with an amended federal income tax return, for the U.S. shareholder
inclusion year of each controlling domestic shareholder in which or with which such
CFC inclusion year ends; providing any notices required under §1.964-1(c)(3)(iii); and
providing any additional information required by applicable administrative
pronouncements.

Section 1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(A)(2)(i) generally provides that a controlling domestic
shareholder may make the election with an amended federal income tax return, duly
filed within 24 months of the unextended due date of the original federal income tax
return for the U.S. shareholder inclusion year with or within which the CFC inclusion
year ends.

Section 1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(A)(3) provides that for U.S. shareholders that are
partnerships, Treas. Reg. §1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(A)(1) and (2) and (c)(7)(viii)(C) are
applied by substituting “Form 1065 (or successor form)” for “federal income tax return”
and by substituting “amended Form 1065 (or successor form) or administrative
adjustment request (as described in §301.6227-1), as applicable,” for “amended federal
income tax return,” each place that it appears.

Section 1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(A)(4) provides that a U.S. shareholder that is a partner in a
partnership that is also a U.S. shareholder in the CFC must generally file an amended
return, as required under Treas. Reg. §1.951A-2(c)(7)(vii)(B)(2), and must generally pay
any additional tax owed as required under Treas. Reg. §1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(B)(3).
However, if a U.S. shareholder is a partner in a partnership that duly files an AAR under
Treas. Reg. §1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(A)(2), that partner is treated as having satisfied the

PLR-118120-22 4

requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(A)(2)(ii) and (iii) with respect to the
interest held through that partnership if:

   (i)    The partnership timely files an AAR as described in Treas. Reg. §1.951A-
          2(c)(7)(viii)(A)(1)(i) or (ii) as applicable; and

   (ii)   Both the partnership and its partners timely comply with the requirements
          of section 6227 with respect to the AAR.

Section 1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(D) provides that a GILTI HTE Election is valid only if all of
the requirements in Treas. Reg. §1.951A-2(c)(7)(viii)(A) are satisfied.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as an election whose due
date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register or a revenue ruling,
revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections.

Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of Treas. Reg. §301.9100-2. It provides
that these requests for relief are granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence
(including affidavits) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the
interests of the Government. A taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in
good faith if, the taxpayer requests relief under Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3 before the
failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the IRS. Treas. Reg.
§301.9100-3(b)(i). A taxpayer is also deemed to have acted reasonably and in good
faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax
professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or
advise the taxpayer to make, the election. Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3(b)(v).

Section 301.9100-3(b)(3)(ii) provides that a taxpayer is not deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer was informed in all material aspects of the
required election and related tax consequences but chose not to file the election.

Section §301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for making an
election is not a determination that a taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election
or that a taxpayer has complied with the other requirements for a valid election.

CONCLUSION

PLR-118120-22 5

Based on the facts provided and representations made, we conclude that the
requirements of Treas. Reg. §§301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. X is
hereby granted an extension of time of one hundred twenty (120) days to make a GILTI
HTE Election with respect to Y for the CFC inclusion year that ends with or within X’s
U.S. shareholder inclusion year, Tax Year 1. X should make the election in a written
statement attached to a duly filed AAR for Tax Year 1.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       /s/ Larry R. Pounders

                                       Larry R. Pounders
                                       Senior Counsel, Branch 2
                                       Associate Chief Counsel (International)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2023, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.