202313010: Large stock bequest qualifies as an unusual grant for public-support testing

Number
202313010
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Determination Letter
IRS subject
Publicly Supported Organizations
Code sections
§ 170, § 509, § 4946, § 507, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 4, 2023
Publicly released
March 31, 2023

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2023, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A publicly supported charity expected a large bequest of company stock that, if counted normally, would cause it to fail the public-support test. The donor had no control over the charity and had only recently made a prior contribution because of its publicly supported nature. The charity had an active public solicitation program, a large grantmaking program, a representative governing body, and a history of meeting the one-third support test without unusual-grant exclusions. The stock could readily be converted to cash, and the bequest had no material restrictions. The IRS concluded that the bequest was unusual and unexpected, came from a disinterested party, and would distort the charity's normal public-support status because of its size. It therefore approved treatment of the bequest as an unusual grant that may be excluded from the applicable public-support fraction.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a large testamentary stock bequest be excluded as an
    unusual grant when applying the charity's public-support test?
  • Outcome: Approved. The bequest qualifies as an unusual grant.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1); Treas. Reg.
    §§ 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii), 1.509(a)-3(c)(4), and 1.507-2(a)(7).

Full text (IRS public release)

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Tax Exempt and Government Entities

IRS P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date:
01/04/2023
Employer ID number:

Person to contact:

Release Number: 202313010
Release Date: 3/31/2023

LEGEND UIL: 509.02-01
C = date

D = company

E = date 2

F = date 3

g dollars = amount

h dollars = amount 2

j percent = number

Dear

We have considered your March 3, 2022 request for recognition of an unusual grant under Treasury Regulation Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions.

Based on the information provided, we concluded that the proposed grant constitutes an unusual grant under

Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions of the regulations. The basis for our conclusion is discussed below.

Facts:

You anticipate receiving a g dollars bequest from an individual who died on C. This bequest will cause you not to pass the public support test set forth in IRC Sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and Treasury Regulation Section 1.170A-9(f) and are requesting the bequest be considered an unusual grant. You expect the bequest to be in the form of D stock, which can be repurchased by D in the amount of g dollars.

The donor had no relationship to you prior to making a h dollars contribution to you in E. The donation was made due to your publicly supported nature. The donor has no control over you.

You carry on an actual program of public solicitation and have a large grant making program. Your public support percentage was j percent for year ending F.

Law:

Two sections of the Treasury Regulations set forth the criteria for an unusual grant. They are:

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

Treasury Regulation Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii)
This section states that, for purposes of applying the 2% limitation to determine whether the 33 1/3% of-support test is satisfied or the 10 % support limitation is met, one or more contributions may be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator of the applicable percent-of-support fraction. The exclusion is generally intended to apply to substantial contributions or bequests from disinterested parties which:

• are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization;

• are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and

• would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as normally being publicly supported.

Treasury Regulation Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4)
This section states that all pertinent facts and circumstances will be taken into consideration to determine

whether a particular contribution may be excluded. No single factor will necessarily be determinative. Such factors may include:

• Whether the contribution was made by a person who;
a. created the organization;
b. previously contributed a substantial part of its support or endowment;

c. stood in a position of authority with respect to the organization, such as a foundation manager within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4946(b);

d. directly or indirectly exercised control over the organization, or;

e. was in a relationship described in IRC Section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1) (G) with someone listed in bullets a, b, c, or d above.

A contribution made by a person described in bullets a through e is ordinarily given less favorable consideration than a contribution made by others not described above.

• Whether the contribution was a bequest or an inter vivos transfer. A bequest will ordinarily be given more favorable consideration than an inter vivos transfer.

• Whether the contribution was in the form of cash, readily marketable securities, or assets which further the exempt purposes of the organization, such as a gift of a painting to a museum.

• Whether (except in the case of a new organization) prior to the receipt of the particular contribution, the organization (a) has carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and (b) has been able to attract a significant amount of public support.

• Whether the organization may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount of public support after the particular contribution. Continued reliance on unusual grants to fund an organization's current operating expenses (as opposed to providing new endowment funds) may be evidence that the organization cannot reasonably be expected to attract future public support.

• Whether, prior to the year in which the particular contribution was received, the organization met the one-third support test described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to Treas. Reg. Section 1.509-3(c)(3);

• Whether the organization has a representative governing body as described in in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i); and

• Whether material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.507-2(a)(7) have been imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection with such transfer.

Application of Law:
The grant meets the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) since the grant is from, until

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

recently, a disinterested party, and :

a) The grant was attracted by reason of your publicly supported nature

b) The grant is unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount

c) The grant will adversely affect your status as normally being publicly supported

The grant meets Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) since the donor had no control over you and:

a) The grant is a testamentary bequest

b) The grant will be in the form of stock which can be easily transferred to cash

c) You have an established program of exempt activities and generate a substantial amount of public support

d) You expect to continue generating a substantial amount of public support

e) Prior to the grant you met the one-third support test described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without any unusual grant exclusions

f) You have a public representative governing body, and

g) No material restrictions have been placed on the grant

We'll make this determination letter available for public inspection after deleting personally identifiable information, as required by IRC Section 6110. We've enclosed Letter 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose - Rulings, and a copy of the letter that shows our proposed deletions.

  • If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Letter 437 on how to notify us.
  • If you agree with our deletions, you don't need to take any further action.

We've sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney. If you have questions, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

Sincerely,

Stephen A Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosures:
Redacted Letter 4787
Letter 437

Letter 4787 (Rev. 11-2021)
Catalog Number 58230Y

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace