Private Letter Ruling 202245004 Released November 11, 2022 Approved

IRS grants extra time to file a late Form 8996 self-certifying as a Qualified Opportunity Fund

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A real estate LLC taxed as a partnership set itself up to invest in Qualified
Opportunity Zone property and intended to be a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF).
To become a QOF, an entity must self-certify each year by filing Form 8996 with
its timely return. The LLC's longtime CPA, dealing with serious health problems,
wrongly told it that it did not need to self-certify until the project was
finished, so the LLC missed the Form 8996 deadline for that first year. After
switching accountants and learning of the error, the LLC asked for relief under
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. The IRS found the taxpayer relied reasonably and in
good faith on its tax professional and that relief would not prejudice the
government, and granted 45 days to file an amended return (or Administrative
Adjustment Request) with a completed Form 8996 to make the QOF election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the taxpayer get an extension of time to make the QOF self-certification election under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3?
  • Outcome: Approved (45-day extension granted)
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202245004
Release Date: 11/11/2022
Index Number: 9100.00-00

Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Person To Contact:
--------------------, ID No. ------------
Telephone Number:


Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B05
PLR-105663-22
Date:
August 18, 2022

TY: -------

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------
Member = --------------
Date 1 = ---------------------
Month = -----------
Year 1 = -------
State Z = ----------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = ------------------
Date 4 = ----------------------
Advisor A = ----------------------
Firm A = ------------------------------------
Date 5 = ------------------
Advisor B = -------------------------
Firm B = ----------------------
Date 6 = -------------------

Dear --------------:

This letter responds to Taxpayer's request for a letter ruling dated Date 1. Specifically,
Taxpayer requests relief under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (Regulations), for an extension of time to make an election
under § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations to be: (1) certified as a
Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF) as defined in § 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code), and (2) treated as a QOF, effective as of Month in Year 1.

                                                  FACTS

Taxpayer is a limited liability company, organized under the laws of State Z on Date 2,
and is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. Taxpayer uses the
cash method of accounting as its overall method, and files its Federal income tax
returns on a taxable year ending Date 3. On Date 4, Taxpayer amended and restated
its operating agreement so it would be organized for purposes of investing in Qualified
Opportunity Zone (QOZ) property as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(2) of the Code.

Taxpayer directly or indirectly, through one or more subsidiaries, acquires, maintains,
manages, finances, or otherwise deals in and with office, retail, commercial, and multi-
family, industrial, hospitality, or mixed-use real estate properties located with qualified
opportunity zones. According to the affidavits and information provided to us, around
Date 4, the time Taxpayer organized as a QOF, it had been working with Advisor A, a
certified public accountant at Firm A, for more than 10 years. Advisor A had always
provided accurate tax advice upon which Taxpayer relied. Advisor A provided
accounting and tax preparation return services for Year 1. While preparing its Year 1
Federal income tax return, Advisor A suffered from serious health complications,
including multiple surgeries. As a result, Advisor A mistakenly told Taxpayer that it did
not need to self-certify as a QOF and file a Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund, at
the time Taxpayer organized as a QOF. Rather, Advisor 1 told Taxpayer it needed to
self-certify as a QOF upon completion of the property, on Date 5. As a result, Taxpayer
failed to file a timely Form 8996 to self-certify as a QOF for Year 1.

Due to Advisor A's health issues, Taxpayer ended the professional relationship with
Advisor A. Taxpayer then engaged the services of Advisor B, a certified public
accountant at Firm B. Taxpayer and Advisor B discussed what actions, if any, must be
taken in connection with Taxpayer's certification as a QOF for Year 1. Advisor B
informed Taxpayer that in order to have self-certified as a QOF, Taxpayer should have
filed the Form 8996 on or before Date 6. Advisor B directed Taxpayer to retain legal
counsel to request an extension to file Form 8996 through a private letter ruling request.

Taxpayer represents that granting of the relief under section 301.9100-3 of the
Regulations will not result in a lower tax liability for the years affected by the election.
Taxpayer further represents it is subject to the centralized partnership audit regime
under section 6221 of the Code for its taxable year ending in Year 1.

                                LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Code directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations for
rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax
Regulations provides the rules for an entity to self-certify as a QOF. Section
1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to be certified as a QOF must do
so annually on a timely filed return in such form and manner as may be prescribed by
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service forms or
instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file a Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund,
with its Federal income tax return for the taxable year to which the certification applies.
The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the tax return (including extensions).
The information provided indicates that Taxpayer did not file Form 8996 due to
Taxpayer's reliance on mistaken advice given by Advisor A.

Because section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations sets forth the
manner and timing for an entity to self-certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory
elections, as defined in section 301.9100-1(b) of the Regulations.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Regulations provide the standards that
the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time
for regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in section 301.9100-2)
will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish
that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not
prejudice the interests of the government.

Under § 301.9100-3(b) of the Regulations, a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the
regulatory election is discovered by the Service, or reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make,
the election. However, a taxpayer is not considered to have reasonably relied on a
qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have known that the
professional was not competent to render advice on the regulatory election or was not
aware of all relevant facts.

In addition, § 301.9100-3(b)(3) of the Regulations provides that a taxpayer is deemed
not to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—

   (i)     seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has
           been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the time the taxpayer
           requests relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory
           election for which relief is requested;

   (ii)    was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and
           related tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or

   (iii)   uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since
           the original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer,
           the Service will not ordinarily grant relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) of the Regulations provides that the Commissioner will grant a
reasonable extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of
the Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) of the Regulations provides that the interests of the
government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax
liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer
would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value
of money).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the Regulations provides that the interests of the
government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election
should have been made or any taxable year that would have been affected by the
election had it been timely made are closed by the period of limitations on assessment
under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting relief under this
section.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief would not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Regulations have been met.

Taxpayer is granted an extension of 45 days from the date of this letter ruling to file an
amended return, or an Administrative Adjustment Request (whichever is appropriate), to
make the election to self-certify as a QOF under § 1400Z-2 of the Code and
§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations, by filing a completed Form
8996.

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This
office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling.
However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in
§ 1.1400Z2(a)–1(b)(34) of the Income Tax Regulations or whether the taxpayer meets
the requirements under § 1400Z-2 of the Code and the regulations thereunder to be a
QOF. Further, we also express no opinion on whether any interest owned in any entity
by Taxpayer qualifies as qualified opportunity zone property, as defined in
§ 1400Z-2(d)(2), or whether such entity would be treated as a qualified opportunity zone
business, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3). We express no opinion regarding the tax
treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the
Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any
conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   Christina M. Glendening
                                   Senior Counsel, Branch 5
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Income Tax & Accounting)

CC: ------------
--------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2022, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.