Private Letter Ruling 202244003 Released November 4, 2022 Approved

The automatic GST-exemption allocation rules applied to a decedent's trust even though the estate never made the allocation on Schedule R

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax applies when wealth passes to grandchildren or later generations, but each person has a GST exemption (here $1,000,000 under the law in effect at the decedent's death) that can shelter transfers from that tax. The exemption can be allocated by hand on the estate tax return, and if it is not, the law "automatically" allocates any unused exemption in a set order. Here a woman set up a revocable trust that became irrevocable at her death and continued to benefit her children, with the remainder going to two granddaughters. Her estate filed the estate tax return (and a supplement) but never included Schedule R, so it never affirmatively allocated any GST exemption to the trust, and she had used none of her exemption during life. The estate asked the IRS to confirm that the automatic allocation rules of section 2632(c) nonetheless applied. The IRS agreed: the exemption was automatically allocated first to the "direct skip" gifts occurring at death (two bequests to the granddaughters plus stock a daughter disclaimed so that it passed straight to a granddaughter), and any remaining exemption was then automatically allocated to the trust. The practical effect is that the trust is treated as having received the leftover GST exemption, reducing or eliminating GST tax on future distributions or termination, without the estate having to have checked the box.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the automatic GST-exemption allocation rules of section 2632(c) allocate the decedent's unused exemption to her trust even though the estate never affirmatively allocated it on the return?
  • Outcome: Approved (automatic allocation applied: first to death-time direct skips, then the remainder to the trust)
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631, 2632(a)–(c); Treas. Reg. § 26.2632-1(d)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202244003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/4/2022 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2632.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------- -------------------------- ID No. ----------------
--------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
--------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------- CC:PSI:B04
------------------------- PLR-103993-22
Date:
------------------------------------------------------------ August 11, 2022


Legend

Decedent = -----------------------------------------------------
Trust = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = -------------------
Date 3 = -------------------------
Date 4 = -------------------------
Date 5 = -------------------
Daughter 1 = ---------------------
Daughter 2 = -----------------
Son = --------------------
Daughter-in-law = -------------------
Granddaughter 1 = -----------------
Granddaughter 2 = -------------------
a = ---------
b = -----------

Dear --------------:

   This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated December

28, 2021, requesting a ruling that the automatic allocation rules under § 2632(c) of the
Internal Revenue Code, as in effect on Date 2, apply to the transfers made by Decedent
to Trust.

     The facts and representations submitted are as follows:

PLR-103993-22 2

   On Date 1, Decedent established a revocable trust. The assets of the revocable

trust were held and administered for the sole benefit of Decedent during her life. The
revocable trust became irrevocable upon the death of Decedent.

   Article III of the revocable trust, creates “Trust,” which provides, in relevant part,

that upon the death of Decedent, if Daughter 1, Daughter 2, Son, or Daughter-in-law
(Son’s wife), is to survive Decedent, the balance of the trust property is to be retained in
Trust. Daughter 2 predeceased Decedent without issue.

    Paragraph A of Article III provides, in relevant part, that the trustees of Trust are

directed to distribute the net income of Trust monthly to Decedent’s children, Daughter
1, Daughter 2, and Son, in equal shares. If Daughter 1 is not then living, Daughter 1’s
share is to be paid to Daughter 1’s daughter, Granddaughter 1. If Daughter 2 is not
then living, Daughter 2’s share is to be paid equally to the other shares distributed under
this article. If Son is not then living, Son’s share is to be paid to Daughter-in-law, or if
Daughter-in-law is not living to Son’s daughter, Granddaughter 2.

   Paragraph B of Article III provides, in relevant part, that the trustees, in their sole

discretion, may distribute any part or all of the principal of Trust to or for the benefit of
any one or more of the issue of Decedent in such amounts as the trustees are to
determine. Paragraph C of Article III provides, in relevant part, that upon the death of
the survivor of Daughter 1, Son, or Daughter-in-law, Trust is to terminate and the
remaining principal and income is to be paid to Granddaughter 1 and Granddaughter 2
in equal shares.

    Decedent died on Date 2, a date prior to January 1, 2001. Pursuant to the

provisions of Decedent’s will, Decedent bequeathed $a to Granddaughter 1 and $a to
Granddaughter 2. Decedent’s residuary estate is to be divided into equal shares for
each of Daughter 1, Daughter 2, and Son, to be distributed outright and free of trust. In
the event that one of Decedent’s children is to predecease Decedent, the deceased
child’s share is to be distributed to that child’s surviving issue, or in default of such
issue, the deceased child’s share is to be distributed equally to the surviving children.
On Date 3, Daughter 1 made a qualified disclaimer of her interest in certain stocks and
securities from Decedent’s estate, and those interests passed directly to
Granddaughter 1. Those interests are represented to have a Date 2 value of $b.

   On Date 4, Decedent’s executor timely filed Form 706, United States Estate (and

Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return for the estate. On Date 5, Decedent’s
executor filed a supplemental Form 706. Schedule R was not included on either return,
and thus none of Decedent’s generation-skipping transfer tax (GST) exemption was
affirmatively allocated to Trust. You represent that prior to Decedent’s death, Decedent
had not allocated any GST exemption during Decedent’s lifetime with respect to any
transfer, and Decedent’s entire GST exemption was available for allocation at the time
of her death.
PLR-103993-22 3

   You have requested the following ruling:

      The automatic allocation rules of § 2632(c) operated to cause the unused
      portion of Decedent’s available GST exemption to be automatically allocated
      to Trust.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

  Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A

generation-skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as: (1) a taxable distribution; (2)
a taxable termination; and (3) a direct skip.

   Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied

by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines “applicable rate” as the product of the
maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.
Section 2642(a) provides the method for determining the inclusion ratio.

    Section 2612(a) provides that the term taxable termination means a termination

(by death, lapse of time, release of a power, or otherwise) of an interest in property held
in trust where the property passes to a skip person with respect to the transferor of the
property. Section 2612(b) provides that the term taxable distribution means any
distribution from a trust to a skip person other than a taxable termination or a direct skip.
Under §2612(c)(1), a direct skip is a transfer subject to federal estate or gift tax made
by a transferor to a skip person. A skip person is defined in § 2613(a) as (1) a natural
person assigned to a generation which is two or more generations below the generation
assignment of the transferor, or (2) a trust if either all the interests in such trust are held
by skip persons, or there is no person holding an interest in the trust, and at no time
after such transfer may a distribution (including distributions on termination) be made
from such trust to a non-skip person.

   Section 2631(a), as in effect on Date 2, provided that for purposes of determining

the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000
which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect
to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation
under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

   Section 2632(a) provides that any allocation by an individual of his

GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date
prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual’s estate (determined with
regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

    Section 2632(b)(1) provides that if any individual makes a direct skip during his

lifetime, any unused portion of such individual’s GST exemption shall be allocated to the
property transferred to the extent necessary to make the inclusion ratio for such
property zero. Section 2632(b)(2) provides that the unused portion of an individual’s
PLR-103993-22 4

GST exemption is that portion of such exemption that had not previously been allocated
or treated as allocated by the individual.

    Section 2632(c)(1), as in effect on Date 2, provided that any portion of an

individual’s GST exemption which has not been allocated within the time prescribed by
§ 2632(a) shall be deemed to be allocated as follows: (A) first, to property which is the
subject of a direct skip occurring at such individual’s death; and (B) second, to trusts
with respect to which such individual is the transferor and from which a taxable
distribution or a taxable termination might occur at or after such individual’s death.

   Section 26.2632-1(d)(1) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations

provides that an allocation of a decedent's unused GST exemption by the executor of
the decedent's estate is made on the appropriate United States Estate (and Generation-
Skipping Transfer) Tax Return (Form 706 or Form 706NA) filed on or before the date
prescribed for filing the return by § 6075(a) (including any extensions actually granted
(the due date)). An allocation of GST exemption to a trust is void if the allocation is
made with respect to a trust that has no GST potential with respect to the transferor for
whom the allocation is being made, as of the date of the transferor's death. For this
purpose, a trust has GST potential even if the possibility of a GST is so remote to be
negligible.

    Section 26.2632-1(d)(2) provides that a decedent's unused GST exemption is

automatically allocated on the due date for filing Form 706 to the extent not otherwise
allocated by the decedent's executor on or before that date. The automatic allocation
occurs whether or not a return is actually required to be filed. Unused GST exemption
is allocated pro rata (subject to the rules of § 26.2642-2(b)), on the basis of the value of
the property as finally determined for purposes of chapter 11 (chapter 11 value), first to
direct skips treated as occurring at the transferor's death. The balance, if any, of
unused GST exemption is allocated pro rata (subject to the rules of § 26.2642-2(b)) on
the basis of the chapter 11 value of the nonexempt portion of the trust property (or in the
case of trusts that are not included in the gross estate, on the basis of the date of death
value of the trust) to trusts with respect to which a taxable termination may occur or
from which a taxable distribution may be made. The automatic allocation of GST
exemption is irrevocable, and an allocation made by the executor after the automatic
allocation is made is ineffective. No automatic allocation of GST exemption is made to
a trust that will have a new transferor with respect to the entire trust prior to the
occurrence of any GST with respect to the trust.

   As discussed above, it is represented that prior to her death, Decedent did not

allocate any GST exemption to any inter vivos transfers and that, at the time of
Decedent’s death, her entire GST exemption of $1,000,000 was available. Pursuant to
the automatic allocation rules contained in § 2632(c)(1), as in effect on Date 2, GST
exemption was automatically allocated first to the direct skip transfers occurring at
death, which were the two $a transfers to Decedent’s granddaughters and the interest
in stocks and securities that you represent had a value of $b that Daughter 1 disclaimed
in a qualified disclaimer. The remaining GST exemption, if any, would be deemed to be
PLR-103993-22 5

allocated to Trust. Accordingly, based upon the facts submitted and the representations
made, we conclude that the automatic allocation rules of § 2632(c), as in effect on
Date 2, operated to cause the unused portion of Decedent’s available GST exemption
to be automatically allocated to Trust.

  In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a

copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

   Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

  This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                     Sincerely,



                                     Melissa C. Liquerman______________________
                                     [Melissa C. Liquerman]
                                      Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                     Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                     (Passthroughs and Special Industries)



  Enclosure:
        Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2022, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.