Tax-exempt controlled entity received 60 days to make depreciation election

Plain-English summary

A taxable corporation wholly owned by a section 501(c)(3) organization indirectly owned a partnership that placed depreciable property in service. The corporation intended to elect under section 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) not to be treated as a tax-exempt entity, which affects whether the property is subject to tax-exempt-use depreciation rules. During a transition in which one accounting firm acquired another firm's clients, neither firm filed the corporation's return or election. The corporation discovered the omission itself, filed the return, and sought relief before the IRS found the problem. The IRS found that the failure was inadvertent, that the corporation acted reasonably and in good faith, and that relief would not prejudice the government. It granted 60 days to file an amended return with the election and a copy of the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could a tax-exempt controlled entity receive extra time to elect out of tax-exempt-entity treatment under section 168(h)(6)(F)(ii)?
• Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file an amended return making the election
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 167 and 168(h)(6)(F); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-3 and 301.9100-7T

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202243002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/28/2022 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 168.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------- ----------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------- --------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B04
PLR-102972-22
Date:
August 02, 2022

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------
Exempt Organization = ----------------------------------------------------
Subsidiary Z = ------------------------------------
Partnership A = ------------------------------
Firm 1 = ---------------------------------------------
Firm 2 = ----------------------------
State = --------
X = ---
Y = ----
Date 1 = -----------------------
Date 2 = ------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Date 4 = ----------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------

Dear ------------------:

This letter responds to Taxpayer’s request, dated Date 1, requesting an extension of
time to make an election under §168(h)(6)(F)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

                                       FACTS

Taxpayer was organized as a limited liability company under the laws of State on Date

2. Taxpayer is a wholly owned subsidiary of Exempt Organization, a tax-exempt
   organization described in § 501(c)(3). On Date 3, Taxpayer made an election on Form
   8832, Entity Classification Election, to be classified as an association taxable as a
   PLR-102972-22 2

corporation effective Date 3 and has been subject to tax as a C corporation since that
date. Because Exempt Organization owns more than 50 percent in value of the stock of
Taxpayer, Taxpayer is a “tax-exempt controlled entity” within the meaning of
§168(h)(6)(F)(iii). Taxpayer uses the cash method of accounting and its taxable year is
the calendar year.

Taxpayer owns X percentage of Subsidiary Z, a limited liability company formed under
the laws of State. Subsidiary Z owns Y percentage of Partnership A, a limited
partnership formed under the laws of State and acts as its sole general partner. As a
result, Taxpayer is an indirect owner of Partnership A. Partnership A was formed as part
of an affiliated group of entities operating under Exempt Organization to rehabilitate,
develop, and operate multi-family residential properties for low-income tenants. On
Date 4, Partnership A acquired and placed in service a property that was eligible to be
depreciated for federal income tax purposes. Partnership A expected that its direct and
indirect owners, including Taxpayer, would make timely elections under §168(h)(6)(F)(ii)
to not be treated as tax-exempt entity.

Taxpayer does not have any separate tax personnel or specialized tax compliance
experience and relies on outside advisors for federal and state tax compliance and
consulting. Firm 1 had historically been one of two tax advisors for Exempt Organization
and was engaged to provide federal and state tax compliance services for Taxpayer for
Year 1. Taxpayer engaged Firm 1 to prepare its federal income tax return, including the
§168(h)(g)(F)(ii) election, for Year 1.

During Year 1, Firm 2 acquired a majority of the clients of Firm 1, including Exempt
Organization and related entities. The transition of this client acquisition was ongoing
during the anticipated filing season of Taxpayer’s Year 1 return. Due to confusion
caused by the client transition, neither Firm 1 or Firm 2 filed Taxpayer’s Year 1 tax
return, thus a § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election was never made.

In Year 2, as another entity related to Exempt Organization was engaging in a separate
transaction, Taxpayer reviewed its own records and discovered its tax return for Year 1
and accompanying election statement was never filed. From the materials submitted, it
appears that Taxpayer intended to make the election under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) for Year 1
and Firm 2 acknowledges that Taxpayer expected Firm 2 to file this return, including
making a timely § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election. Taxpayer has since filed its tax return for
Year 1, and now seeks permission under § 301.9100 to obtain an extension of time in
which to make the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election.

                               APPLICABLE LAW

Section 167(a) of the Code generally provides for a depreciation deduction for property
used in a trade or business. Under § 168(g), the alternative depreciation system must
be used for any tax-exempt use property as defined in §168(h). Section 168(h)(6)(F)(i)
PLR-102972-22 3

provides generally that any tax-exempt controlled entity is treated as a tax-exempt entity
for purposes of § 168(h)(6).

Section 168(h)(6)(A) provides that, for purposes of § 168(h), if any property which is not
tax-exempt use property is owned by a partnership having both a tax-exempt entity and
a nontax-exempt entity as partners and any allocation to the tax-exempt entity is not a
qualified allocation, then an amount equal to such tax-exempt entity's proportionate
share of such property is treated as tax-exempt use property. Under §168(h)(6)(F)(iii)(I),
a corporation (without regard to that subparagraph and § 168(h)(2)(E)) constitutes a
“tax-exempt controlled entity” if 50 percent or more (in value) of the corporation's stock
is held by one or more tax-exempt entities (other than a foreign person or entity). In the
case of tiered partnerships and other entities, § 168(h)(6)(E) applies similar rules. Under
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(ii), a tax-exempt controlled entity can elect not to be treated as a tax-
exempt entity. Once made, the election is irrevocable and will bind all tax-exempt
entities holding an interest in the tax-exempt controlled entity.

Under § 301.9100-7T(a)(2)(i) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, a
§168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election must be made by the due date of the tax return for the first
taxable year for which the election is to be effective. Section 301.9100-7T(a)(3)(i)
provides that the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election must be made by attaching a statement to
the tax return for the taxable year for which the election is to be effective.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has the
discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section
301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as including any election for which
a regulation prescribes the due date. The § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election is a regulatory
election.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Service will use to
determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section
301.9100- 3(a) provides that a request for an extension of time for a regulatory election
(other than automatic extensions of time covered in § 301.9100-2) will be granted when
the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted
reasonably and in good faith and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably
and in good faith if the taxpayer:

   (i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered
   by the Service;

   (ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the
   taxpayer's control;

PLR-102972-22 4

   (iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising due diligence, the
   taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;

   (iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or

   (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax professional
   failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Under § 301.9100-3(b)(3), a taxpayer will not be considered to have not acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer:

   (i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty could be
   imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and the new
   position requires a regulatory election for which relief is requested;

   (ii) was fully informed of the required election and related tax consequences, but
   chose not to file the election; or

   (iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
   original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service
   will not ordinarily grant relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Service will grant a reasonable extension of
time only when doing so will not prejudice the interests of the Government. The
interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a taxpayer
having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election
than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made.

                                     ANALYSIS

The facts submitted by Taxpayer indicate that Taxpayer intended at the outset to make
the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election, that its failure to make the election on a timely-filed return
was inadvertent, and that Taxpayer is not using hindsight in requesting relief.
Moreover, Taxpayer requested this relief before failure to make the election was
discovered by the Service. Finally, Taxpayer acted reasonably in and good faith, and
the interests of the government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief under
§301.9100-3.

                                   CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts as represented and the applicable law, we conclude that the
request for relief under § 301.9100-3 should be granted. Taxpayer is granted an
extension of 60 days from the date of this letter to file an amended return making the
election under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii). Taxpayer must attach a copy of this ruling letter to its
amended return. If Taxpayer files its amended return electronically, it may satisfy this
PLR-102972-22 5

requirement by attaching a statement to its amended return that provides the date and
control number of this letter ruling.

This ruling is based upon information and representations submitted by Taxpayer. While
this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a
ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, this ruling grants an extension of time to make a §168(h)(6)(F)(ii)
election; however, this ruling does not address whether taxpayer is eligible to make the
election.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that
it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representation, on
file, we are sending a copy of this letter to Taxpayer's authorized representative. This
letter is being issued electronically in accordance with Rev. Proc. 2020-29, 2020-21
I.R.B. 859 and Rev. Proc. 2022-1, 2022-1 I.R.B. 1. A paper copy will not be mailed to
Taxpayer.

                                    Sincerely,




                                    Angella L. Warren
                                    Branch Chief, Branch 4
                                    Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                    (Income Tax & Accounting)

cc: ---------------------