Extra time granted to elect 10-year write-off of research costs
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation that heads a consolidated group of companies wanted to spread its
research and experimental (R&E) costs for one tax year as a deduction over 10
years, an option allowed by IRC § 59(e). To lock that in, it had to attach a
signed election statement to its return, but it missed the filing deadline. It
asked the IRS for extra time under the "9100 relief" regulations (Treas. Reg.
§§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3), which let the Commissioner forgive a late
election when the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the government
is not harmed. The IRS agreed the standard was met and gave the company 120 days
from the ruling date to make the election. The ruling only grants the deadline
extension; it does not bless whether the costs actually qualify as R&E under
§ 174(a) or otherwise vouch for the taxpayer's numbers.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a consolidated group get a late-filing extension to make the § 59(e) election to amortize its R&E expenditures over 10 years?
- Outcome: Approved (120-day extension granted)
- Key authorities: IRC § 59(e); IRC § 174(a); Treas. Reg. § 1.59-1(b)(1); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202233009 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 8/19/2022 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.02-03
Person To Contact:
---------------- ------------------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------- --------------------
----------------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------- CC:PSI:B06
PLR-124719-21
In Re: Request for extension of time under Date:
§§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the May 26, 2022
Procedure and Administration Regulations to
file an election pursuant to § 59(e) of the
Internal Revenue Code
LEGEND:
Taxpayer = --------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Tax Year = ------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
Dear ----------:
This letter responds to a letter dated December 2, 2021, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer, requesting an extension of time
under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations
to make an election under § 59(e) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 1.59-
1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations to deduct ratably over a 10-year period
Taxpayer’s research and experimental (R&E) expenditures described in § 174(a)
incurred in Tax Year. This letter is being issued electronically in accordance with Rev.
Proc. 2020-29, 2020-21 I.R.B. 859. A paper copy will not be mailed to Taxpayer.
PLR-124719-21 2
FACTS
Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:
Taxpayer is the common parent of a consolidated group for federal income tax
purposes. Taxpayer and its affiliated group of corporations file a consolidated federal
income tax return on a fiscal year basis using the accrual method of accounting.
Taxpayer intended to make an election under § 59(e) and § 1.59-1(b)(1) to deduct
ratably over a 10-year period certain R&E expenditures for Tax Year. On its timely filed
consolidated income tax return for Tax Year, Taxpayer capitalized and deducted ratably
certain R&E expenditures incurred for Tax Year. Taxpayer has made representations
explaining why the statement required to make the election under § 59(e) and § 1.59-
1(b)(1) was not timely filed.
Taxpayer represents that, in requesting an extension of time to make an election under
§ 59(e) for Tax Year, it acted reasonably and in good faith and, further, there is no
prejudice to the interests of the government.
RULING REQUESTED
Taxpayer requests an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to make
an election under § 59(e) to capitalize and deduct ratably certain R&E expenditures
incurred during Tax Year.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 59(e)(1) provides, in relevant part, that any qualified expenditure to which an
election under § 59(e)(1) applies shall be allowed as a deduction ratably over the 10-
year period beginning with the taxable year in which such expenditure was made.
Section 59(e)(2)(B) includes in the definition of “qualified expenditure” any amount
which, but for an election under § 59(e), would have been allowable as a deduction
(determined without regard to § 291) for the taxable year in which paid or incurred under
§ 174(a) (relating to R&E expenditures).
Section 59(e)(3) provides that except as provided in § 59(e), no deduction shall be
allowed under any other section of the Code for any qualified expenditure to which an
election under § 59(e) applies.
Section 59(e)(4)(A) provides that an election may be made under § 59(e)(1) with
respect to any portion of any qualified expenditure.
Section 59(e)(4)(B) provides that any election under § 59(e) may be revoked only with
the consent of the Secretary.
PLR-124719-21 3
Section 1.59-1(b)(1) provides that an election under § 59(e) shall only be made by
attaching a statement to the taxpayer’s income tax return (or amended return) for the
taxable year in which the amortization of the qualified expenditures subject to the
§ 59(e) election begins. The statement must be filed no later than the date prescribed
by law for filing the taxpayer’s original income tax return (including any extensions of
time) for the taxable year in which the amortization of the qualified expenditures subject
to the § 59(e) election begins. Additionally, the statement must include the taxpayer’s
name, address, and taxpayer identification number, and the type and amount of
qualified expenditures identified in § 59(e)(2) that the taxpayer elects to deduct ratably
over the applicable period described in § 59(e)(1).
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of
time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except
subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Section 301.9100-1(b) provides the term “regulatory election” includes an election the
due date of which is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards used to determine
whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-
1(a).
Section 301.9100-2 allows automatic extensions of time for making certain elections.
Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
The Commissioner will grant requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 when the taxpayer
provides the evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to
the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section
301.9100-3(a).
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
Accordingly, the Commissioner grants Taxpayer an extension of time of 120 days from
the date of this letter to make an election under § 59(e) and § 1.59-1(b)(1) to deduct
ratably over a 10-year period its R&E expenditures incurred for Tax Year. The § 59(e)
election must comply with the manner-of-election requirements of § 1.59-1(b)(1).
In making the election for Tax Year, Taxpayer must attach a copy of this letter ruling to
its amended consolidated federal income tax return. Alternatively, if Taxpayer files its
PLR-124719-21 4
amended consolidated federal income tax return electronically, it may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to its amended return that provides the date and
control number of the letter ruling.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for a ruling, it is subject to verification on examination. Except as
specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax
consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code and
the regulations thereunder. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion concerning
whether Taxpayer satisfies the requirements of §§ 59(e) or 174(a) or Taxpayer’s
proposal to amend its tax return for Tax Year.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy
of this letter to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
By: _______________________________
Jennifer A. Records
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 6
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 Purposes
cc: -------------------------
-------------------------------
------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2022, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.