Consolidated group gets more time to elect out of bonus depreciation after its preparer filed the extension late
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Businesses that buy qualifying equipment can normally take a large "additional
first year" (bonus) depreciation deduction under IRC § 168(k), but they can also
elect out of it for whole classes of property. That election must be made on a
timely filed return (including extensions). Here a corporate taxpayer intended
to elect out, and had done so consistently for years, but its outside tax firm
filed the automatic extension (Form 7004) a few days late, so the return itself
was late and the election could not be made on time. The taxpayer asked the IRS
for relief under Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3, which let the IRS
extend a missed regulatory-election deadline when the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith and the government is not prejudiced. The IRS granted the
extension: the taxpayer may make the § 168(k)(7) election by filing an amended
return with the required statement. The relief does not extend the deadline for
the underlying return and does not decide whether any particular property
actually qualifies.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the taxpayer get an extension of time to make the
§ 168(k)(7) election not to deduct additional first year (bonus) depreciation? - Outcome: approved (extension granted)
- Key authorities: IRC § 168(k)(7); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-2(f)(1),
301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202228002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/15/2022 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------- -----------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------------- --------------------
--------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B07
PLR-100236-22
Date:
April 21, 2022
Re: Request for extension of time to make the election not to deduct additional first year
depreciation.
Legend
Symbol Identity EIN # (as applicable)
Parent ---------------------------------------- ----------------
Sub1 ------------------------------------- ----------------
Sub2 ---------------------------------------- ----------------
Sub3 ------------------------------------ ----------------
Sub4 ---------------------------------- ----------------
Sub5 -------------------------------- ----------------
Sub6 ------------------------------------------------ ----------------
Sub7 ------------------------------ ----------------
Taxable Year --------------------------------------------------
Product ------------
Date1 ----------
Date2 --------------------------
Date3 --------------------------
Date4 ------------------
Date5 ------------------
Month1 ------------------
Firm ---------------------------
Amount -----------------------
Dear ------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated September 22, 2021, and subsequent
correspondence submitted by your representative on behalf of Parent, Sub1, Sub2,
PLR-100236-22 2
Sub3, Sub4, Sub5, Sub6, and Sub7 (collectively, Taxpayer) requesting an extension of
time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to file a request for an extension of time to make the election not to deduct
the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for all
3 year property, 5 year property, 7 year property, 10 year property, and 15 year property
placed in service during Taxable Year. Taxpayer should have made the election on
Taxpayer’s timely filed Federal income tax return for Taxable Year pursuant to
§ 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(A) and (B) of the Income Tax Regulations. However, Taxpayer was
unable to make the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation because
Taxpayer failed to timely file its tax return for Taxable Year. This letter ruling is being
issued electronically as permissible under section 7.02(5) of Rev. Proc. 2021-1, 2021-1
I.R.B. 1, 35.
FACTS
Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:
Taxpayer, a C corporation, files a Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax
Return, following a Date1 fiscal year end. Taxpayer's overall method of accounting is an
accrual method. Taxpayer’s primary trade or business is the manufacture and sale of
Product.
Taxpayer engaged Firm, an outside tax consulting firm, to prepare and file its
Federal income tax return for Taxable Year. Taxpayer intended to make the election
under § 168(k) to not claim the additional first year deduction for certain classes of
property that taxpayer placed in service during Taxable Year. The due date of
Taxpayer's Federal income tax return for the Taxable Year, without extensions, was
Date2.
Taxpayer intended to file a Form 7004, Application for Automatic Extension of
Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information, and Other Returns by Date2.
During the month preceding Date2, Firm prepared an extension calculation for Taxpayer
and recommended that Taxpayer make an advance payment of Amount on or before
Date2. The recommended advanced payment was prepared with the assumption that
Taxpayer would make the election not to deduct additional first year depreciation for
certain classes of property on its tax return for Taxable Year. Prior to Date2, Taxpayer
sent an email to Firm authorizing Firm to file Taxpayer’s Form 7004 on Taxpayer’s
behalf. On Date2, Taxpayer made payments of Amount to the Internal Revenue Service
consistent with the extension calculation prepared by Firm.
Due to Firm’s error, Taxpayer’s Form 7004 was not filed on or before Date2.
Instead, Firm filed Taxpayer’s Form 7004 on Date3, after the original due date of the
return. Taxpayer’s Form 7004 was rejected via e-file and subsequent paper filing.
PLR-100236-22 3
Taxpayer electronically filed its Federal income tax return for Taxable Year on
Date4. Taxpayer subsequently filed an amended Federal income tax return for Taxable
Year on Date5.
Taxpayer has consistently elected not to deduct additional first year depreciation
based on the recommendation of Firm during the seven taxable years preceding
Taxable Year.
RULING REQUESTED
Accordingly, Taxpayer requests an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3 to file the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
deduction under § 168(k) for all 3 year property, 5 year property, 7 year property, 10
year property, and 15 year property that are qualified property and placed in service by
Taxpayer during Taxable Year.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Sections 168(k)(1) and (6) allow, in the taxable year that qualified property is
placed in service, a 100-percent additional first year depreciation deduction for qualified
property acquired by the taxpayer after September 27, 2017, and placed in service by
the taxpayer after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023 (or before January
1, 2024 for qualified property described in § 168(k)(2)(B) or (C)).
Section 168(k)(7) provides that a taxpayer may make an election not to deduct
the additional first year depreciation for any class of property that is qualified property
placed in service during the taxable year (the § 168(k)(7) election). Section 1.168(k)-
2(f)(1)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the § 168(k)(7) election applies to
all qualified property that is in the same class of property and placed in service in the
same taxable year. Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(ii) defines “class of property” for purposes of
the § 168(k)(7) election as meaning each class of property described in § 1.168(k)-
2(f)(1)(ii)(A)-(G).
Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(A) provides that the § 168(k)(7) election not to deduct
additional first year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of
the Federal tax return for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service by
the taxpayer.
Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(B) provides that the § 168(k)(7) election not to deduct
additional first year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562,
“Depreciation and Amortization,” and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for
the Taxable Year, provided that the election not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation is made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer's timely filed tax return
indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.
PLR-100236-22 4
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has the discretion to grant
a reasonable extension of time under the rules in §§ 301.9100-1(c) and 301.9100-3 to
make certain regulatory elections. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election
as an election with a due date prescribed by regulations published in the Federal
Register, or in a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
The requested election not to deduct additional first year depreciation is a
regulatory election as defined under § 301.9100-1(b) because the due date of the
election is prescribed in § 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(A). Furthermore, Taxpayer's request must
be analyzed under the requirements of § 301.9100-3 because the automatic provisions
of § 301.9100-2 are not applicable.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted an extension of time to make the election under § 168(k)(7) not to
deduct the additional first year depreciation for all 3 year property, 5 year property, 7
year property, 10 year property, and 15 year property placed in service by Taxpayer
during Taxable Year, that qualify for the additional first year depreciation deduction. The
election must be made by Taxpayer filing an amended Federal tax return for Taxable
Year, with a statement indicating that Taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional
first year depreciation for all 3 year property, 5 year property, 7 year property, 10 year
property, and 15 year property placed in service during that taxable year.
Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the
Federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code (including other subsections of § 168). Specifically, no opinion is
expressed or implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service by
Taxpayer during the Taxable Year is eligible for the additional first year depreciation
deduction under § 168(k).
PLR-100236-22 5
Further, this letter ruling does not grant any extension of time for filing Taxpayer's
Form 1120 for Taxable Year.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter
ruling to Taxpayer's authorized representatives. We are also sending a copy of this
letter ruling to the appropriate IRS operating division official.
Sincerely,
EVAN K. HEWITT
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 7
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax and Accounting)
Enclosures (2):
copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2022, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.