Consolidated group gets 75 more days to elect to waive the carryback of its net operating loss

Number
202228001
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Consolidated Net Operating Loss Deduction
Code sections
§ 1502, § 172, § 301.9100-3
Ruling dated
April 19, 2022
Publicly released
July 15, 2022

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

When a consolidated group of corporations has a net operating loss, it can choose to carry that loss back to earlier years or instead waive the carryback and only carry it forward. Waiving the carryback requires a specific election statement filed with the group's return under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) (pursuant to IRC § 172(b)(3)). Here the parent company intended to waive the carryback and filed all its returns as if it had, but the required election statement was never actually filed. After the deadline passed, the parent asked the IRS for relief under Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3, which let the IRS extend a missed regulatory-election deadline when the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the government is not prejudiced. Because the request was made before the IRS discovered the failure and the group had not carried the loss back, the IRS granted 75 days from the date of the letter to file the election by amending the return. The relief is conditioned on the group's tax not being lower than if the election had been timely made, and penalties and interest still apply.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the consolidated group get an extension of time to make
    the § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) election to waive its NOL carryback period?
  • Outcome: approved (75-day extension granted)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 172(b)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i),
    301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202228001
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/15/2022
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1502.21-00
Person To Contact:
-----------------------------------
------------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------- --------------------
-------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:3
PLR-100180-22
Date:
April 19, 2022

Legend

Parent = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------

Date 1 = --------------------------

Company Official = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------

Dear --------------:

This letter ruling responds to a letter dated December 6, 2021, submitted by Parent, requesting an extension of time under §§301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, to make an election under §1.1502- 21(b)(3)(i) to relinquish the entire carryback period for the Parent consolidated group's consolidated net operating loss ("CNOL") for the tax year ending Date 1 (the "Election"). The material information submitted for consideration is summarized below.

Parent is the common parent of a consolidated group ("Parent Group"). Parent Group incurred a CNOL in the tax year ending Date 1. Parent intended to relinquish the carryback period for its consolidated group's CNOL on its tax return for the tax year ending Date 1. All returns for Parent Group were filed consistent with a valid election having been made. However, for various reasons, a valid election was not filed. After the date that the Election was due (with extensions), it was discovered that a valid election was not filed. Subsequently, this request was submitted for an extension of time to file a valid election.

Parent has represented that Parent Group has not, and will not, carry back any portion of the CNOL for the tax year ending Date 1 to a prior consolidated return year of Parent
PLR-100180-22
2

Group. Parent has also represented that no portion of the CNOL for the tax year ended Date 1 has been carried back, or will be carried back, to a separate return year (within the meaning of §1.1502-1(e)) of any corporation that was a member of Parent Group at any time during the tax year ended Date 1. Parent has further represented that Parent is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the time Parent requested relief (taking into account any qualified amended return filed within the meaning of §1.6664-2(c)(3)) and for which the new return position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested.

Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) provides that a consolidated group may make an irrevocable election under section 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire carryback period with respect to a CNOL for any consolidated return year. The election is made in a separate statement entitled "THIS IS AN ELECTION UNDER §1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) TO WAIVE THE ENTIRE CARRYBACK PERIOD PURSUANT TO SECTION 172(b)(3) FOR THE [insert consolidated return year] CNOLs OF THE CONSOLIDATED GROUP OF WHICH [insert name and employer identification number of common parent] IS THE COMMON PARENT." Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) also provides that the statement must be filed with the group's income tax return for the consolidated return year in which the loss arises.

Under §301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Requests for relief under §301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., §1.1502- 21(b)(3)(i)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under §301.9100- 3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to file the Election, provided Parent establishes it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Information, an affidavit, and representations submitted by Parent and Company Official explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file a valid election. The information establishes that that the request for relief was filed before the failure to
PLR-100180-22
3

timely make the Election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service. See
§301.9100-3(b)(1)(i).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations made, we conclude that Parent has shown it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is granted under
§301.9100-1, until 75 days from the date on this letter, for Parent to file the Election with respect to the relinquishment of the entire carryback period for the CNOL for the tax year ending Date 1, as described above.

The above extension of time is conditioned on Parent Group's tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to Parent Group's tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the applicable Director's office upon audit of the federal income tax returns involved.

Parent must file the Election in accordance with §1.1502-21(b)(3)(i). Parent Group's return for the tax year ending Date 1, having been filed consistent with a valid election having been made, must be amended to attach the election statement required by
§1.1502-21(b)(3)(i). A copy of this letter must be attached to the election statement. Alternatively, if Parent Group files its returns electronically, Parent may satisfy this latter requirement by attaching a statement to its return that provides the date on, and control number (PLR-100180-22) of, this ruling.

We express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.

For the purposes of granting relief under §301.9100-3, we relied on certain statements and representations made by Parent and Company Official. However, the Director should verify all essential facts. In addition, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under §301.9100-3 to file the Election, penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable, if any, continue to apply.
PLR-100180-22
4

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Thomas I Russell
Thomas I. Russell
Chief, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace