9100-3 extension to self-certify a late qualified opportunity fund (Form 8996) election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A newly formed LLC taxed as a partnership was set up to be a qualified opportunity fund (QOF), which requires self-certifying each year by filing Form 8996 with a timely partnership return. The taxpayer's accounting firm verbally accepted the engagement, but because of a staff mistake never set up the client in its workflow system and missed the filing deadline, filing neither the return nor an automatic extension. After catching the error, the firm filed the return and Form 8996 late. The taxpayer asked the IRS under Treasury Regulation 301.9100-3 for extra time to make the QOF self-certification, which is a regulatory election. The IRS found the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith (it had reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to act) and that relief would not prejudice the government, so it treated the late-filed Form 8996 as timely. The IRS expressed no opinion on whether the taxpayer actually qualifies as a QOF or whether its underlying investment is a qualified opportunity zone business.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a taxpayer get a § 301.9100-3 extension to make a late QOF self-certification (Form 8996) election under § 1400Z-2 after its tax advisor missed the filing deadline?
- Outcome: Approved (late-filed Form 8996 treated as timely)
- Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2(d), (e)(4); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(a)-1, 1.1400Z2(d)-1, 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202213007
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/1/2022
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1400Z.02-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------
--------------------
----------------------------------------
ID No. ------------
-----------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------
--------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:5
In Re:----------------------------------------- PLR-119155-21 Date: January 3, 2022
Legend
Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------
-------------------------
Member = -----------------
State Z = -----------------
Accounting Firm = --------------------------------------------
----
Tax Advisor = --------------------------------
Entity = --------------------------------------------
---
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = ------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------
Date 4 = ------------------
Date 5 = --------------------------
Date 6 = ----------------------
Date 7 = -----------------
Date 8 = -------------------
Date 9 = -------------------
X% = --------
Year 1 = -------
Dear -------------:
This ruling responds to Taxpayer’s request for a letter ruling dated Date 1. Specifically, Taxpayer requests an extension of time under sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Income Tax Regulations, (1) to make a timely election under section 1.1400Z2(a)-
PLR-119155-21
2
1(a)(2)(i) to be certified as a qualified opportunity fund (QOF), as defined in section 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, and (2) for Taxpayer to be treated as a QOF, effective as of the month Taxpayer was formed in Year 1, as provided by section 1400Z-2(d) and section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations.
FACTS
Taxpayer was organized as a limited liability company under the laws of State Z on Date 3 and is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. Taxpayer’s overall method of accounting is the cash method of accounting and has a tax year end of Date 4.
Taxpayer’s sole investment is in Entity. Entity is a limited liability company classified as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes and was formed for the purpose of operating as a Qualified Opportunity Zone Business as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3).
Taxpayer engaged the services of Accounting Firm in Year 1. According to the affidavits and information provided to us, on or about Date 5, Member had a conversation with Tax Advisor to prepare and timely file Taxpayer’s 2020 Federal income tax return, Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, and all related forms and elections to self-certify Taxpayer as a QOF. Tax Advisor verbally accepted the engagement and the responsibility to prepare and file a timely return, including the preparation and filing of an automatic extension using Form 7004, Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information and Other Returns, if necessary. Accounting Firm uses a standardized procedure to be followed upon the acceptance of a new engagement in order for a new client to be set up in Accounting Firm’s workflow management system. However, Tax Advisor failed to follow Accounting Firm’s procedure and therefore Taxpayer was not setup in Accounting Firm’s system. Since Taxpayer was not set up in Accounting Firm’s system, Tax Advisor failed to file Taxpayer’s federal income tax return or Form 7004 by the Date 6 deadline.
On Date 7, Tax Advisor became aware of the failure to file Taxpayer’s automatic extension and began preparing the Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return and all related forms and elections. Tax Advisor prepared Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund and filed it with Taxpayer’s Form 1065 for Year 1 on Date 2.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations for rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations provides the rules for an entity to self-certify as a QOF. Section 1.1400Z2(a)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to be certified as a QOF must do so annually on a timely filed return in such form and manner as may be
PLR-119155-21
3
prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund, with its tax return for the year to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the tax return (including extensions). The information provided indicates that Accounting Firm did not file Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return and the Form 8996 by Date 6 due to a mistake made by Tax Advisor.
Because section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for an entity to self-certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in section 301.9100-1(b).
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in section 301.9100-2) will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
Under section 301.9100-3(b) a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service, or reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. However, a taxpayer is not considered to have reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have known that the professional was not competent to render advice on the regulatory election or was not aware of all relevant facts.
In addition, section 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested;
(ii) was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service will not ordinarily grant relief.
PLR-119155-21
4
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the interests of the government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made or any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.
Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief would not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, based solely on the facts and information submitted, and the representations made in the ruling request, Taxpayer has satisfied the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief and Taxpayer's Form 8996, filed on Date 2, is considered timely filed.
This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual information, representations, and other data submitted.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in section 1.1400Z2 (a)–1(b)(34) or whether the taxpayer meets the requirements under
§ 1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF. Further, we also express no opinion on whether Entity is a qualified opportunity zone business, as defined under
§ 1400Z-2(d)(3). We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-119155-21
5
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
Shareen S. Pflanz
Chief, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
cc: -----------------------
--------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace