Adding the title "Member" next to a signature on Form 8979 does not invalidate a Partnership Representative appointment

Number
202208015
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Designation of Partnership Representative
Code sections
§ 6223
Ruling dated
November 10, 2021
Publicly released
February 25, 2022

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2022, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Under the centralized partnership audit rules (the BBA regime), a partnership designates a Partnership Representative (PR) to act for it before the IRS, using Form 8979. Someone asked Chief Counsel whether writing a title such as "Member" next to a person's name on the signature line of that form would call the appointment into question. In this brief email advice, Counsel said no. Whether a person is currently or was previously connected to the partnership is not a factor in deciding if they are eligible to serve as PR. So adding the word "Member" after the signer's name did not invalidate the appointment. This is a narrow, practical clarification for people filling out the form, not a formal ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does adding a title like "Member" on the Form 8979 signature line affect the validity of a person's appointment as Partnership Representative?
  • Outcome: Advice given (no; the appointment was not invalidated).
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6223; Treas. Reg. § 301.6233-1(b) (as cited in the document).

Full text (IRS public release)

 ID:       CCA_2021111013294414                        [Third Party Communication:

 UILC:     6223B.00-00                                 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 202208015
Release Date: 2/25/2022
From: ------------------
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 1:29:44 PM
To: ----------------
Cc: ------------------------
Bcc: ------------------
Subject: RE: ----------------------------- Legitimacy of Partnership Representative Appointment


Hi ---------,

You asked whether adding a title, such as "Member," on the signature line of Form 8979
would impact the legitimacy of a person's appointment as a Partnership Representative
(PR). A PR's current or previous connection to a BBA partnership is not a determinative
factor when considering a person's (or entity's) eligibility to serve as a PR. See Treas.
Reg. 301.6233-1(b). Therefore, ------------appointment as PR on Form 8979 was not
invalidated by his inclusion of the word "Member" after his name. Please let us know if
you have any further questions.

Thanks,
------

_______________________________
----------------------------------
------------------------
--------------------
--------------------------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace