9100 relief to file a late section 754 election after a partner's death
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A limited partnership had a partner who died, an event that lets the partnership step up (or down) the basis of its assets to match the successor's basis in the partnership interest, but only if the partnership has a section 754 election in place. The partnership timely filed its return for the year of the death, but inadvertently left out the written statement making the § 754 election. It asked the IRS for "9100 relief," a discretionary extension under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3, and the IRS granted it. Relief is available when the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and granting it will not prejudice the government. The IRS gave the partnership 120 days from the date of the letter to file the election statement, effective for the year including the death and thereafter. The grant is contingent: the partnership must make all the § 734(b) and § 743(b) basis adjustments (and related depreciation adjustments) it would have made had the election been timely, and its partners must adjust the basis of their partnership interests accordingly, even for years now closed by the statute of limitations. This matters because a § 754 election can significantly change depreciation and gain calculations, and 9100 relief can rescue a missed one.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the partnership get an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 to file a late § 754 election effective for the year a partner died?
- Outcome: Approved (9100-3 relief granted; 120 days to file the election statement, contingent on making the corresponding § 734(b)/§ 743(b) basis adjustments)
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 754, 734, 743; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202152007 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/30/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 9100.15-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------------------------- --------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------ --------------------
-------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------- CC:PSI:B01
PLR-107662-21
Date:
September 17, 2021
LEGEND
Company = -------------------------------------
-----------------------
Date 1 = -----------------
Date 2 = ----------------------
State = -------------
A = -------------------------------------
-------------------------
Dear ----------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated February 9, 2021, and additional information
submitted on behalf of Company by its authorized representative, requesting an extension
of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an
election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).
FACTS
The information submitted states that Company was organized as a limited partnership
under the laws of State on Date 1. Company is classified as a partnership for federal tax
purposes. A held a partnership interest in Company when he died on Date 2. Company’s
tax return for the taxable year including Date 2 was timely filed, but a valid § 754 election
to adjust the basis of partnership property was inadvertently not filed with the return.
Company represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
PLR-107662-21 2
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with the
regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property is adjusted, in
the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734, and, in the case of
a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such an election
shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all
transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which the
election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.
Section 1.754-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an election
under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b) with
respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership,
shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year
during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return
must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including extensions
thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension
of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except
subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as
an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal
Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in
the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will use to
determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do not meet
the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides the
evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction
of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) the
grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result,
Company is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make
an election under § 754 effective for its taxable year including Date 2 and thereafter. The
election should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center
PLR-107662-21 3
for association with Company’s return for its taxable year including Date 2. A copy of this
letter should be attached to the statement filed.
This ruling is contingent on Company adjusting the basis of its properties to reflect any §
734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been made if the § 754 election had been
timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect any additional depreciation that would
have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether
the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for
any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any depreciation deduction allowable for an
open year is to be computed based upon the remaining useful life and using property
basis as adjusted by the greater of any depreciation deduction allowed or allowable in
any prior year had the § 754 election been timely made. Additionally, the partners of
Company must adjust the basis of their interests in Company to reflect what that basis
would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory
period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year
subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of Company must reduce the
basis of their interests in Company in the amount of any additional depreciation that would
have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made.
Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
tax consequences of any facts discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, we
express no opinion as to whether Company is a partnership for federal tax purposes.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
PLR-107662-21 4
In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of
this letter ruling to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
By:
Laura Fields
______________________________
Laura Fields
Chief, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.