Private Letter Ruling 202149009 Released December 10, 2021 Approved

IRS consents to revoke a Section 83(b) election filed within the 30-day window

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer received restricted units from an employer that were subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, then filed an election under section 83(b). An 83(b) election accelerates income tax to the time of grant instead of waiting until the units vest. Shortly afterward, and less than 30 days after the grant, the taxpayer asked the IRS for consent to revoke that election. An 83(b) election normally cannot be revoked without the Commissioner's consent, and consent is usually limited to cases involving a mistake of fact. But the IRS follows a broader principle that any election can be revoked on or before the due date for making it, and Revenue Procedure 2006-31 says a request to revoke an 83(b) election is generally granted if filed by that due date (30 days after the transfer). Because the taxpayer's revocation request came within that 30-day window, the IRS granted consent to revoke.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer revoke a section 83(b) election when the revocation request was filed within 30 days of the property transfer?
  • Outcome: Approved (consent to revoke the election granted)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 83(b); Treas. Reg. § 1.83-2(a), (f); Rev. Proc. 2006-31, 2006-2 C.B. 32

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202149009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/10/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 83.02-04 Person To Contact:
---------------------ID No.
------------------ -----------------


                                                           Telephone Number:

----------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:EEE:EB:EC
PLR-116200-21
Date:
September 15, 2021

Legend
Date 1 = -----------------
x = --------
Employer = ----------------------------------------
Date 2 = ------------------

Dear -----------:

  This letter is in response to your request, dated April 26, 2021, in which you

asked for consent to revoke an election you made under § 83(b) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). The facts, as represented, are as follows.

   On Date 1, you were granted x restricted units of Employer, subject to a

substantial risk of forfeiture. On Date 2, you filed an election under § 83(b) of the Code
with the Internal Revenue Service Center where you file your individual tax return. The
§ 83(b) election referenced all x restricted units received from Employer on Date 1. On
April 28, 2021, less than 30 days after Date 1, you sent a letter to this office requesting
consent to revoke your § 83(b) election.

   Section 83 of the Code sets forth the rules for transfers of property in connection

with the performance of services. Section 83(a) provides that the excess of the fair
market value of the property transferred, at the time the property becomes substantially
vested, over the amount (if any) paid for the property, shall be included as
compensation in the service provider's gross income for the taxable year in which the
property becomes substantially vested. Property is substantially vested when it is either
transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

    Section 83(b) of the Code and § 1.83-2(a) of the Income Tax Regulations

(Regulations) permit the service provider to elect to include in gross income the excess
(if any) of the fair market value of the property at the time of transfer over the amount (if
any) paid for the property, as compensation for services. Under § 83(b)(2) of the Code,
an election made under § 83(b) must be made in accordance with the regulations
thereunder and must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service no later than 30 days
PLR-116200-21 2

after the date that the property is transferred to the service provider.

   Section 83 of the Code and § 1.83-2(f) of the Regulations provide that an election

under § 83(b) may not be revoked without the consent of the Commissioner. Section
1.83-2(f) provides that consent to revoke an election under § 83(b) will be granted only
in a case where the transferee is under a mistake of fact as to the underlying
transaction and must be requested within 60 days of the date on which the mistake first
became known to the person who made the election. The Service has recognized the
principle that an election made under the Code or Regulations may be revoked on or
before the due date for making the election. Section 2.08 of Rev. Proc. 2006-31, 2006-
2 C.B. 32, provides that a request for consent to revoke a § 83(b) election will generally
be granted if the request is filed on or before the due date for making that § 83(b)
election.

   In the instant case, you filed your request to revoke your § 83(b) election within

the 30 day time period allowed under § 83(b) for making the election. Based solely on
the representations provided and the information and documents submitted, consent to
revoke your § 83(b) election is granted.

     The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by you and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by you. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of
the request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. Except
as specifically ruled above, no opinion is expressed as to the federal tax consequences
of the transaction described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically,
no opinion is expressed concerning other tax consequences of § 83 and its applicability
to the transaction described above. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who
requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited
as precedent. A copy of this letter should be attached to any income tax return to which
it is relevant.

                                              Sincerely,



                                              THOMAS D. SCHOLZ
                                              Senior Counsel
                                              Executive Compensation Branch
                                              Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                              (Employee Benefits, Exempt
                                              Organizations and Employment Taxes)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.