IRS gives a GRAT settlor extra time to opt out of automatic GST-exemption allocation after the attorney never advised it

Plain-English summary

A person (the settlor) set up a grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT) and transferred property into it, reporting the gift on a timely Form 709. When the settlor's retained annuity interest ended and the estate-tax inclusion period (ETIP) closed, the trust continued as a trust that could trigger generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax. That triggered the rule that automatically uses up the settlor's GST tax exemption on the transfer under section 2632(c), unless the settlor affirmatively elects out under section 2632(c)(5). The settlor's attorney never advised about that election, so it was never made. The settlor asked the IRS for an extension of time under section 2642(g) and the "9100 relief" regulations to elect out. Because the settlor reasonably relied on a tax professional who failed to advise the election, and granting relief would not prejudice the government, the IRS granted the extension: the settlor has 120 days from the date of the letter to elect out by filing an amended Form 709. Electing out matters because it lets the settlor preserve GST exemption for other transfers rather than having it automatically consumed here.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Should the IRS grant an extension of time to elect out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption to a GRAT transfer, where the settlor's attorney failed to advise making the election?
• Outcome: Approved (9100 relief granted; 120 days from the letter to elect out on an amended Form 709)
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 2632(c)(5), 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Treas. Reg. § 26.2632-1(b)(2); Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202148003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/3/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2632.00-00, 2642.00-00,
9100.00-00 Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------- ---------------------
------------------------ Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:PSI:B4
PLR-105911-21
Date:
September 09, 2021

Legend

Settlor = ----------------------
---------------------------

Trust = ----------------------------------

Trust Agreement = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Children’s Trust = ----------------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = -------------------

Date 2 = --------------------

Date 3 = -------------------

Attorney = ----------------------------

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated March 9, 2021, and
subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time under § 2642(g) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to elect out of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax automatic
allocation of exemption rules.
PLR-105911-21 2

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

On Date 1 (a date after December 31, 2000), Settlor established Trust, a grantor
retained annuity trust. On Date 2 (a date in the same year as Date 1), Settlor
transferred property to Trust (the Date 2 transfer). Settlor filed a timely Form 709,
United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return. Trust is governed by
Trust Agreement.

Settlor’s retained interest in Trust terminated at the end of the annuity term on Date 3

The estate tax inclusion period (ETIP) with respect to the Date 2 transfer closed for GST
tax purposes on Date 3. On Date 3, Trust continued as Children’s Trust. Children’s
Trust has GST potential.

No taxable distributions, taxable terminations or any other events have occurred with
respect to any trust established under the governing instrument of Trust that would
result in a GST tax liability.

Settlor retained Attorney to draft Trust Agreement and to provide tax advice with respect
to the Date 2 transfer. Attorney failed to advise Settlor of the rules under § 2632(c)
regarding the automatic allocation of GST exemption and the ability to elect out of the
automatic allocation of GST exemption by making an election under § 2632(c)(5).
Consequently, Settlor failed to make an election under § 2632(c)(5) with respect to the
Date 2 transfer.

Settlor requests an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to elect out of
automatic allocation of GST exemption for the Date 2 transfer.

Law and Analysis

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as, (1) a
taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every
individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by such
individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the
transferor.

Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be
irrevocable.

Section 2632(c)(1) provides that if any individual makes an “indirect skip” during such
individual’s lifetime, any unused portion of such individual’s GST exemption is treated
as allocated to the property transferred to the extent necessary to make the inclusion
PLR-105911-21 3

ratio for such property zero. If the amount of the indirect skip exceeds such unused
portion, the entire unused portion shall be allocated to the property transferred.

Under § 2632(c)(3)(A), the term “indirect skip” means any transfer of property (other
than a direct skip) subject to the tax imposed by chapter 12 made to a GST trust, as
defined in § 2632(c)(3)(B). Under § 2632(c)(3)(B), a GST trust is a trust that could have
GST potential with respect to the transferor unless the trust satisfies any of the
exceptions listed in § 2632(c)(3)(B)(i)-(vi).

Section 2632(c)(4) provides that for purposes of § 2632(c), an indirect skip to which
§ 2642(f) applies shall be deemed to have been made only at the close of the ETIP.
The fair market value of such transfer shall be the fair market value of the trust property
at the close of the ETIP.

Section 2632(c)(5)(A)(i) provides, in part, that an individual may elect to have § 2632(c)
not apply to an indirect skip or any or all transfers made by such individual to a
particular trust. Section 2632(c)(5)(B)(ii) provides that the election may be made on a
timely filed gift tax return for the calendar year for which the election is to become
effective.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations
provides that, in the case of an indirect skip made after December 31, 2000, to which
§ 2642(f) (relating to transfers subject to the estate tax inclusion period or ETIP) does
not apply, the transferor’s unused GST exemption is automatically allocated to the
property transferred (but not in excess of the fair market value of the property on the
date of the transfer). This automatic allocation is effective whether or not a Form 709 is
filed reporting the transfer and is effective as of the date of the transfer to which it
relates. An automatic allocation is irrevocable after the due date of the Form 709 for the
calendar year in which the transfer is made.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(ii) provides that, except as otherwise provided, the transferor
may prevent the automatic allocation of GST exemption with regard to an indirect skip
by making an election as provided in § 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii).

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(A) provides, in relevant part, that a transferor may prevent
(1) the automatic allocation of GST exemption (elect out) with respect to one or more (or
all) current-year transfers made by the transferor to a specified trust or trusts, and (2)
the automatic allocation of GST exemption (elect out) with respect to all future transfers
made by the transferor to a specified trust or trusts.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(B) provides that to elect out, the transferor must attach an
election out statement to a Form 709 filed within the time period provided in § 26.2632-
1(b)(2)(iii)(C). In general, the election out statement must identify the trust, and
specifically must provide that the transferor is electing out of the automatic allocation of
GST exemption with respect to the described transfer or transfers.
PLR-105911-21 4

Under § 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(C), to elect out, the Form 709 with the attached election out
statement must be filed on or before the due date for timely filing the Form 709 for the
calendar year in which (1) for a transfer subject to § 2642(f), the ETIP closes or (2) for
all other elections out, the first transfer to be covered by the election out was made.

Section 26.2632-1(c)(1)(i) provides that a direct skip or an indirect skip that is subject to
an ETIP is deemed to have been made only at the close of the ETIP. The transferor
may prevent the automatic allocation of GST exemption to a direct skip or an indirect
skip by electing out of the automatic allocation rules at any time prior to the due date of
the Form 709 for the calendar year in which the close of the ETIP occurs (whether or
not any transfer was made in the calendar year for which the Form 709 was filed, and
whether or not a Form 709 otherwise would be required to be filed for that year).

Section 2642(b)(1)(A) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of
the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or
before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be made
under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1), the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall
be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of
§ 2001(f)(2)), or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of
an ETIP, its value at the time of the close of the ETIP.

Section 2642(f)(1) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, if an
individual makes an inter vivos transfer of property, and the value of such property
would be includible in the gross estate of such individual under chapter 11 if such
individual died immediately after making such transfer (other than by reason of § 2035),
any allocation of GST exemption to such property shall not be made before the close of
the ETIP (and the value of such property shall be determined under § 2642(f)(2)). If
such transfer is a direct skip, such skip shall be treated as occurring as of the close of
the ETIP.

Section 2642(f)(3) provides that, for purposes of §2642(f), the term “estate tax inclusion
period” means any period after the transfer described in § 2642(f)(1) during which the
value of the property involved in such transfer would be includible in the gross estate of
the transferor under chapter 11 if he died.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall by regulation
prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be
granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and
an election under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5).

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under
§ 2642(g)(1), the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including
evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such
other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to
PLR-105911-21 5

grant relief, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not
expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that, under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for
allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for
electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust
as a generation-skipping transfer trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by
statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to
make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in
§ 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides an automatic extension of time for making certain elections.
Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an
extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and not
expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50,
a taxpayer may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in
§ 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the
provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides, in part, that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3
will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction
of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant
of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the
requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, Settlor is granted an
extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to elect out of the automatic
allocation rules with respect to the Date 2 transfer. The election should be made on an
amended Form 709 filed with the Internal Revenue Service at the following address:
Internal Revenue Service, Attn: E&G, Stop 824G, 7940 Kentucky Drive, Florence, KY
41042-2915.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-105911-21 6

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   Associate Chief Counsel
                                   Passthroughs & Special Industries



                                   Leslie H. Finlow
                              By: ______________________________
                                  Leslie H. Finlow
                                  Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosure (1)
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc: