Chief Counsel Advice 202142013 Released October 22, 2021 Advice

This is a Westbrooks case because the defendant was convicted solely of Title 26 crimes, so the restitution is not assessable

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Under section 6201(a)(4), the IRS can assess court-ordered criminal restitution for unpaid tax as if it were a tax, but only when the restitution qualifies (the "Westbrooks" question). This short Chief Counsel email advises that a particular case is a Westbrooks case, meaning the restitution here does not qualify. The defendant was convicted solely of Title 26 crimes after pleading not guilty. The email adds that a reference to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act in the redacted material is dicta: it had no bearing on the outcome and does not reflect a determination that the case was outside Westbrooks.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is the ordered restitution assessable by the IRS, or is this a "Westbrooks" case?
  • Outcome: Advice given (this is a Westbrooks case; restitution not assessable)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6201(a)(4); United States v. Westbrooks; the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2021052507000944
UILC: 6201.01-06

Number: 202142013
Release Date: 10/22/2021
From: ----------------------
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 07:00:09
To: -------------
Cc: -------------------------------------------------------
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Form 4442

This is a Westbrooks case – the defendant was convicted solely of Title 26 crimes after
pleading not guilty. The reference to the MVRA in --------------------------------------------------
-------------- is dicta – it had no bearing on the outcome of the case, and does not reflect
a determination that the case was not subject to Westbrooks.

Please call if you have further questions about this matter.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.