Determination Letter 202141030 Released October 15, 2021 Approved Transcribed from scan

IRS approves a set-aside for university research equipment grants

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation asked the IRS to approve a multi-year set-aside for grants
to U.S. universities. The grants would help selected laboratories purchase and
install specialized equipment for emerging biological research techniques,
with possible uses including studying how viruses enter cells, how DNA folds
during cell division, and which proteins are misfolded in certain diseases. The
foundation planned a national competition, required the universities to share
the costs, and would provide later research funding after equipment
installation. The IRS found that the project's expense, technical complexity,
and multi-year selection and implementation process made a set-aside more
suitable than an immediate payment. It approved the set-aside under Section
4942(g)(2), subject to distribution within 60 months after the first set-aside.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the private foundation treat funds reserved for multi-year university equipment grants as a qualifying distribution under IRC § 4942(g)(2)?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4942(g)(2); Treas. Reg. § 53.4942(a)-3(b)(1) and (b)(2); Rev. Rul. 74-450

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date: July 21, 2021

Employer Identification Number:

Contact person - ID number:

Release Number: 202141030
Release Date: 10/15/2021

Contact telephone number:

LEGEND
B = State
C = Name
D = Specialized
E = Specialized Equipment
F = Specialization
G = Quantity
H = Quantity
J = Date
K = Date
L = Date
M = Date
P = Specialized Equipment
X = Date
Y = Date
Z = Name

p dollars = Amount
q dollars = Amount
r dollars = Amount

UIL: 4942.03-07

Dear

Why you are receiving this letter

This is in response to your September 15, 2020 letter requesting approval of a set-aside
under Internal Revenue Code Section 4942(g)(2). You’ve been recognized as tax-exempt
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code and have been determined to be a private foundation
under Section 509(a).

Our determination

Based upon the information furnished, your set-aside program is approved under Internal
Revenue Code Section 4942(g)(2). As required under Section 4942(g)(2), the set-aside
amount must be paid within the 60-month period after the date of the first set-aside.

Description of set-aside request

Letter 4797 (11-2011)
Catalog Number 58293H

You were formed under the laws of the State of B in X. You have requested a set-aside of p
dollars for the tax year ending Y. The nature and purpose of the set aside is for Z through the
awarding of C to universities that will fund the equipment purchase, installation costs and other
research expenses associated with newly emerging D techniques. The specific technique of
interest for Z is that which incorporates focused E and [redacted], with advanced P that provides enough
[redacted]. Specifically, this
advanced technique will allow biologists to watch and directly record the most basic cellular
processes that to-date have only been inferred. Some example research questions that can be
addressed with this technique include how exactly viruses (such as COVID-19) interact with the
cellular membrane to first invade a cell, or how does DNA fold and unfold itself during cell
division, or which proteins are misfolded in diseases such as sickle-cell anemia.

Currently, this technology is found in less than G research labs within the United States. Through
the set aside, you plan to fund H additional laboratories to acquire this capability. You explained
that you are well positioned to do this as it will directly build on the previous investment that you
made for the [redacted]. The cost of the additional equipment for the advanced
[redacted] and the focused E, along with a [redacted]-year service contract is estimated at r dollars per
site. Additionally, a dedicated technical support staff member will be necessary for successful
operation of the focused E. You will also structure the Request for Proposals for C to provide a
portion of these costs (a total of q dollars per site) while the applicant university agrees to provide
the remainder of the required funding. This will ensure that the selected universities will have
committed to substantial institutional support for long-term operation, including [redacted].

To award C, you will conduct a national competition that will be open to your prior recipient
universities as well as other universities and their research teams. Only those universities in the
United States that have P and their research teams located within the U.S. are eligible to submit a
proposal and receive C.

In addition, before the competition is opened, you will host a workshop that will refine the
requirements for proposals for this competition. Once the proposals are received and then
reviewed, the most appropriate universities will be selected for C. You will then provide multi-
year grants totaling q dollars in the years of J and K for the purchase and installation of E at the
winning universities. You will also verify their successes for these years. This will then be
followed by r dollars in research grant funding for the years L and M.

Furthermore, an authorized signer from each of the recipient universities will be required to sign
your acknowledgement form that states that they have reviewed and agree to the Terms and
Conditions for receiving C which are consistent with your restated bylaws, and philosophy
statement.

Z can be better accomplished by a set-aside rather than by an immediate payment of funds because
of the complex and costly nature of Z, as well the time required to successfully implement C. The
set aside approach also allows you to have control over the use of C, to help ensure its success.

Letter 4797 (11-2011)
Catalog Number 58293H

You will distribute the total set aside amount within [redacted] months after the date of the first set aside.
You have no planned additions to the set aside after its initial establishment.

Basis for our determination

Internal Revenue Code Section 4942(g)(2)(A) states that an amount set aside for a specific project,
which includes one or more purposes described in Section 170(c)(2)(B) may be treated as a
qualifying distribution if it meets the requirements of Section 4942(g)(2)(B).

Section 4942(g)(2)(B) of the Code states that an amount set aside for a specific project will meet
the requirements of this subparagraph if, at the time of the set-aside, the foundation establishes
that the amount will be paid within five years and either clause (i) or (ii) are satisfied.

Section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Code is satisfied if, at the time of the set-aside, the private
foundation establishes that the project can be better accomplished using the set-aside than by
making an immediate payment.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(1) of the Foundations and Similar Excise Taxes Regulations provides that
a private foundation may establish a project as better accomplished by a set-aside than by
immediate payment if the set-aside satisfies the sustainability test described in Section 53.4942(a)-
3(b)(2).

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the Foundations and Similar Excise Taxes provides that specific
projects better accomplished using a set-aside include, but are not limited to, projects where
relatively long-term expenditures must be made requiring more than one year’s income to assure
their continuity.

In Revenue Ruling 74-450, 1974-2 C.B. 388, an operating foundation converted a portion of
newly acquired land into a public park into a four-year construction contract. The construction
contract payments were to be mainly during the final two years. This constituted a “specific
project.” The foundation’s set-aside of all its excess earnings for four years was treated as a
qualifying distribution under Internal Revenue Code Section 4942(g)(2).

What you must do

Your approved set-aside(s) will be documented on your records as pledges or obligations to be
paid by the date specified. The amounts set aside will be taken into account to determine your
minimum investment return under Internal Revenue Code Section 4942(e)(1)(A), and the income
attributable to your set aside(s) will also be taken into account when computing your adjusted net
income under Section 4942(f) of the Code.

Additional information

This determination is directed only to the organization that requested it. Internal Revenue Code
Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Letter 4797 (11-2011)
Catalog Number 58293H

Please keep a copy of this letter in your records.
If you have questions, please contact the person listed in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosure

Letter 4797 (11-2011)
Catalog Number 58293H

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.