Chief Counsel Advice 202141013 Released October 15, 2021 Advice

Restitution is assessable because the sentencing transcript shows it was imposed independently, but the government must wait until non-government victims are paid

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Under section 6201(a)(4), the IRS can assess court-ordered criminal restitution for a Title 26 tax as if it were a tax, but only when it was imposed as an independent part of the sentence rather than solely as a condition of supervised release (the "Westbrooks" question). This short Chief Counsel email advises that this is not a Westbrooks case: after reviewing the sentencing transcript, which controls over the written judgment, restitution was imposed independently, so the Westbrooks restrictions do not apply. It cautions, however, that because there are non-government victims the defendant must pay, the government cannot collect its own restitution until those victims have been paid.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is the ordered restitution assessable, or is this a "Westbrooks" case?
  • Outcome: Advice given (not a Westbrooks case; assessable, but government collection is subordinate to non-government victims)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6201(a)(4); United States v. Westbrooks

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2020072711542244
UILC: 6201.01-06

Number: 202141013
Release Date: 10/15/2021
From: ----------------------
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 11:54:22 AM
To: -----------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------------------------------
Bcc:
Subject: RE: potential Westbrooks--------

This is not a Westbrooks case. After reviewing the sentencing transcript, which controls
in preference to any language in the written judgment, restitution in this case was
imposed independently and not as a condition of supervised release. Therefore, the
Westbrooks restrictions on assessment and collection do not apply.

Please note that, because there are non-government victims for whose benefit the
defendant has been ordered to pay restitution, the government cannot collect its
restitution until the non-government victims have been paid.

Please call if you have any additional questions about this matter.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.