Private Letter Ruling 202140009 Released October 8, 2021 Approved

Foundation receives five more years to dispose of inherited company stock

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation inherited a large minority stake in a complex, closely held company from its creator through a trust, leaving the foundation with excess business holdings under Section 4943. During the initial five-year disposal period, the foundation consulted legal and corporate counsel, evaluated a company redemption, and explored a sale to independent investors. Its extension-period plan called for continued sale or redemption efforts, use of an investment bank, and donation of the shares to public charities if disposition otherwise appeared impossible during the first four extension years. The foundation submitted the plan before the original deadline and also provided it to the state attorney general. The IRS found the bequest unusually large, the holdings complex, the prior efforts diligent, and the plan reasonably capable of completion. It granted another five years to dispose of the shares and ruled that the Section 4943(a)(1) tax would not apply during that extension, while expressing no opinion on possible self-dealing.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the foundation qualify for an additional five years to dispose of inherited excess business holdings without Section 4943 tax during the extension?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 4943(a), 4943(c)(6) and (7), 4941(d)(2)(F), and 4946(a)(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

 Internal Revenue Service                          Department of the Treasury
                                                   Washington, DC 20224

 Number: 202140009                                 Third Party Communication: None
 Release Date: 10/8/2021                           Date of Communication: Not Applicable
 Index Number: 4943.00-00
                                                   Person To Contact:
 ------------------------------                    --------------------, ID No. -----------------
 ----------------------------------------------    Telephone Number:
 --------------------------------------            ---------------------
                                                   Refer Reply To:
                                                   CC:EEE:EOET:EO2
                                                   PLR-103554-21
                                                   Date:
                                                   July 14, 2021




LEGEND:

Taxpayer = --------------------------------
Individual = ---------------------------
Company = --------
Trust      = -----------------------------------
Counsel = ------------------------------------
Attorney = ---------------------
Date 1     = -------------------
Date 2     =-----------------------------
Date 3 = -----------------------------
State     = ---------------
X         =-------------
Y         =--------------------
Z         =-------

Dear ------------------:

This letter ruling is in response to a request from your authorized representative dated
January 30, 2021 and subsequent documentation requesting an extension of an
additional five years under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) section 4943(c)(7) for
disposing of certain excess business holdings. Taxpayer represents the facts as
follows.

FACTS

Taxpayer was incorporated as a State nonprofit corporation on Date 1. Taxpayer is
exempt from federal income tax under IRC section 501(a) as an organization described
in IRC section 501(c)(3) and is classified as a private foundation under IRC section
PLR-103554-21                                 2

509(a). Taxpayer was created by Individual, who is a substantial contributor to
Taxpayer within the meaning of IRC section 507(d)(2), and therefore a disqualified
person with respect to Taxpayer under IRC section 4946(a)(1)(A).

As a result of Individual’s death, Taxpayer received X shares of Company’s capital
stock from Trust, also a disqualified person, on Date 2, which Taxpayer represents is an
unusually large bequest. These shares, which were valued for federal tax purposes at
Y, represent approximately Z percent of Company’s outstanding capital stock and are a
minority interest in Company. As a result of the bequest of X shares to Taxpayer,
Taxpayer has excess business holdings of Company under IRC section 4943(c)(1).

Taxpayer represents that it has made diligent efforts during the initial five-year period to
dispose of its interest in Company since receiving the shares stock. After receiving the
shares, Taxpayer consulted with its legal counsel, Counsel, to determine its options for
disposition of the shares. Counsel advised that a sale of its shares would be difficult
due to the complex nature of the corporate structure of Company and the self-dealing
rules under the IRC. Taxpayer also states that it received a redemption offer from
Company but did not proceed because the offer did not comply with IRC requirements.
Taxpayer subsequently engaged the services of Attorney, who is a corporate attorney
with significant experience in investments in private companies, to evaluate the
feasibility of a sale of the Taxpayer’s shares to an independent investor.

Taxpayer’s plan of disposition includes continued diligent efforts to sell its shares of
Company. These efforts include obtaining periodic reviews by Attorney to assess the
marketability of its shares in Company and hiring an experienced investment banking
firm to broaden its search for outside investors. Taxpayer has represented that it has
been engaging in productive discussions with Company since the beginning of the
current year. Taxpayer states that Company has expressed an interest in redeeming
the shares of all shareholders and a willingness to provide financial and other
information that would be helpful in engaging in a meaningful search for a buyer.
Taxpayer is also considering donating the excess business holdings to one or more
public charity grantees.

Taxpayer’s initial five-year period for disposing of excess business holdings under IRC
section 4943(c)(6) will end on Date 3. Prior to the end of the initial five-year period
under IRC section 4943(c)(6), Taxpayer submitted a plan for disposing of all of the
excess business holdings.

Based on the documentation submitted and the facts and representations described
above, Taxpayer requested the following rulings.

RULING REQUESTS

    1. Extend for an additional five years the period of time for disposing of Taxpayer’s
      excess business holdings under IRC section 4943(c)(7).
PLR-103554-21                                 3


    2. Taxpayer’s interest in Company will not be subject to the IRC section 4943(a)(1)
      tax during the extension period.

LAW

IRC section 4943(a)(1) imposes a tax on the value of excess business holdings of any
private foundation in a business enterprise.

IRC section 4943(c)(1) provides that the term “excess business holdings” means, with
respect to the holdings of any private foundation in any business enterprise, the amount
of stock or other interest in the enterprise that the foundation would have to dispose of
to a person other than a disqualified person in order for the remaining holdings of the
foundation in such enterprise to be permitted holdings.

IRC section 4943(c)(2) provides that the permitted holdings of any private foundation in
an incorporated business enterprise are 20 percent of the voting stock, reduced by the
percentage of the voting stock owned by all disqualified persons.

IRC section 4943(c)(6) generally provides that if there is a change in a private
foundation’s holdings in a business enterprise (other than by purchase by the private
foundation or by a disqualified person) that causes the private foundation to have
excess business holdings in such enterprise, the interest of the foundation in such
enterprise (immediately after such change) shall (while held by the foundation) be
treated as held by a disqualified person (rather than by the foundation) during the five-
year period beginning on the date of such change.

IRC section 4943(c)(7) provides that the Secretary may extend the IRC section
4943(c)(6) period to dispose of excess business holdings for an additional five years in
the case of an unusually large gift or bequest of diverse business holdings or holdings
with complex corporate structures if:

       (A) the foundation establishes that: (i) it made diligent efforts to dispose of such
       holdings have been made within the initial five-year period, and (ii) disposition
       within the initial five-year period has not been possible (except at a price
       substantially below fair market value) by reason of the size and complexity or
       diversity of such holdings;

       (B) before the close of the initial five-year period: (i) the private foundation
       submits to the Secretary a plan for disposing of all of the excess business
       holdings involved in the extension, and (ii) the private foundation submits the
       plan to the attorney general (or other appropriate state official) having
       administrative or supervisory authority or responsibility with respect to the
       foundation’s disposition of the excess business holdings involved and submits to
PLR-103554-21                                  4

       the Secretary any response received by the private foundation during the five-
       year period; and

       (C) the Secretary determines that such plan can reasonably be expected to be
       carried out before the close of the extension period.

IRC section 4941(a) imposes an excise tax on each act of self-dealing between a
disqualified person and a private foundation.

IRC section 4941(d)(1)(A) provides that self-dealing includes, among other things, any
direct or indirect sale or exchange of property between a private foundation and a
disqualified person.

IRC section 4941(d)(2)(F) provides that any transaction between a private foundation
and a corporation that is a disqualified person pursuant to any liquidation, merger,
redemption, recapitalization, or other corporate adjustment, organization, or
reorganization, shall not be an act of self-dealing if all of the securities of the same class
as that held by the foundation are subject to the same terms and such terms provide for
receipt by the foundation of no less than fair market value.

ANALYSIS

Taxpayer received a bequest of Company stock from Individual through Trust, both
disqualified persons with respect to Taxpayer under IRC section 4946(a)(1). Taxpayer’s
ownership of Company stock constitutes excess business holdings under section
4943(c)(1), and Taxpayer received that stock other than by purchase by Taxpayer or by
disqualified persons with respect to Taxpayer. As a result, section 4943(c)(6) provides
Taxpayer with an initial five-year period to dispose of its excess business holdings,
which will end on Date 3.

The shares of stock in Company received by Taxpayer represent a significant portion of
Company’s outstanding capital stock. Company is a complex closely held business.
Accordingly, Individual’s bequest of Company stock to Taxpayer represents an
unusually large gift of diverse business holdings with a complex corporate structure
within the meaning of IRC section 4943(c)(7).

During the initial five-year period, Taxpayer has made diligent efforts to dispose of its
excess business holdings, including working closely with Counsel and Attorney to
attempt to either sell the shares to an independent investor or have them redeemed by
Company. Before the end of the initial five-year period, Taxpayer submitted a request
seeking an additional five-year period within which to dispose of its excess business
holdings in Company along with a plan for disposing all of the excess business holding
during the extension period. Taxpayer’s plan includes either a sale of its shares in
Company to a third party or a redemption of the shares by Company, which Taxpayer
represents will be in accordance with the requirements of IRC section 4941(d)(2)(F).
PLR-103554-21                                  5

Taxpayer also represents that in the event a sale or redemption of the shares does not
appear possible during the first four years of the extension period, it will donate the
shares to one or more public charity grantees.

Taxpayer has also submitted its plan to the State attorney general and provided the
State attorney general’s response to the plan to the Internal Revenue Service.

RULING

Based on the facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer, we have determined
that Taxpayer’s plan to dispose of its excess business holdings in Company can
reasonably be expected to be carried out before the close of the extension period.

Therefore, we conclude that Taxpayer meets the requirements under IRC section
4943(c)(7) for an extension of an additional five years to dispose of these excess
business holdings, and Taxpayer’s excess business holdings in Company will not be
subject to tax under IRC section 4943(a)(1) during the five-year extension period.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by or on behalf of Taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury
statements executed by an individual with authority to bind Taxpayer and upon the
understanding that there will be no material changes in the facts. While this office has
not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for these rulings, it is
subject to verification on examination. The Associate Chief Counsel (Employee
Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes) will revoke or modify a letter
ruling and apply the revocation retroactively if there has been a misstatement or
omission of controlling facts; the facts at the time of the transaction are materially
different from the controlling facts on which the ruling was based; or, in the case of a
transaction involving a continuing action or series of actions, the controlling facts
change during the course of the transaction. See Rev. Proc. 2021-1, 2021-1 I.R.B. 1,
section 11.05.

This letter does not address the applicability of any section of the Code or Regulations
to the facts submitted, other than those sections specifically described. Except as
expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax
consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this
letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed as to the existence or acts of self-dealing by
disqualified persons with respect to Taxpayer, nor is any opinion expressed regarding
Taxpayer’s plan of disposition beyond the rulings provided herein.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. IRC section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to Taxpayer’s authorized representative.
PLR-103554-21                                   6


A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   James Zelasko
                                   Branch Chief
                                   Exempt Organizations Branch 2
                                   Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and
                                   Employment Taxes



cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.