IRS splits preferred instrument treatment under Section 382
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A publicly traded corporation issued a preferred instrument and another instrument to finance part of a stock acquisition. The preferred instrument carried cumulative fixed dividends, a liquidation right, no director-election voting rights, and a future call right at a premium. The taxpayer asked how the instrument should be characterized as stock for purposes of Section 382, which limits the use of tax attributes after ownership changes. Based on the instrument's terms and the taxpayer's representations, the IRS ruled that one redacted percentage of the instrument would not be treated as stock under Section 382(k)(6)(A) or the regulations. A different redacted percentage would be treated as stock under Section 382(k)(6)(A).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: What portions of the preferred instrument constituted stock for purposes of Section 382?
- Outcome: Mixed.
- Key authorities: IRC § 382(k)(6)(A); Treas. Reg. § 1.382-2T(f)(18)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202131005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/6/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 382.11-05, 382.11-07
Person To Contact:
---------------------- ---------------------------, ID No. ---------------
------------------------------------- -----------------
------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
----------------------------- --------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:1
PLR-118554-20
Date:
May 05, 2021
Legend
Taxpayer = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
State A = -------------
Shareholder A = ----------------------------------
Instrument I = ----------------------------------------------------------------
Instrument II = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
Target = ---------------------------------------------
Issue Price = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
Unit = --------
Action I = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Date 1 = --------------------
PLR-118554-20 2
Date 2 = --------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------------------------------------
a = -----------
b = ------------
c = --
d = -------------------------
e = -------------------------
f = ---------
I = ---
J = ---
Dear ----------------:
This letter responds to your letter dated August 21, 2020, and supplemented by
additional letters dated November 19, 2021 and March 8, 2021 submitted on behalf of
Taxpayer requesting rulings regarding the federal income tax characterization of
Instrument I (as described below) for purposes of Internal Revenue Code section 382.
The material information submitted in that request and subsequent correspondence is
summarized below.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon facts and representations submitted
by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of
the request for rulings. Verification of the information, representations, and other data
may be required as part of the audit process.
Summary of Facts
Taxpayer is a State A corporation whose common stock is widely held and publicly
traded.
On Date 2, Taxpayer acquired the stock of Target. In order to fund a portion of the
purchase price for such acquisition, on Date 1 (the “Issue Date”) Taxpayer issued a
units of Instrument I, together with Instrument II to Shareholder A for $b. The purchase
price was allocated between Instrument I and Instrument II. As a result of such
allocation, Taxpayer determined the issue price for Instrument I to be Issue Price.
PLR-118554-20 3
Instrument I possess no right to vote in elections for any member of the Taxpayer board
of directors. Instrument I generally (i) provides for (A) cumulative dividends at a fixed
rate of dividend rate of c%, and (B) a liquidation right of $d and (ii) is perpetual and
callable at $e plus accrued and unpaid dividends upon and after Date 3. On the Issue
Date, Taxpayer expected to redeem Instrument I upon Date 3. The amortization of the
redemption premium over the period ending with Date 3, together with the annual fixed
dividend on Instrument I, would result in an effective dividend yield of f% through Date
- Although (i) the dividend rate as well as the redemption price can be increased as a
result of certain limited actions by Taxpayer, and (ii) Taxpayer has the right to pay
dividends at its election in common stock, neither were expected to occur as of the
Issue Date. On Date 1, the maximum number of units of Instrument I that can be
transferred to carry out Action I is I% of units held by the Shareholder A. As of Date 1,
J% of the units of Instrument I cannot be transferred to carry out Action I.Representations
Taxpayer makes the following representations:
1. As of the Issue Date, Taxpayer expected that it would be able to make all
quarterly payments of dividends on Instrument I and redeem Instrument I on
Date 3.
2. The terms of Instrument I and Instrument II were established without Taxpayer
giving any consideration to the possible application of section 382 at any point in
time
Rulings
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations set forth above, we
rule as follows:
(1) J% of Instrument I will not constitute stock within the meaning of either section
382(k)(6)(A) or Treas. Reg. § 1.382-2T(f)(18).
(2) I% of Instrument I will constitute stock within the meaning of section 382(k)(6)(A).
Caveats
Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion
concerning the tax treatment of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. We express no opinion about the tax treatment of the
transaction or item as described under other provisions of the Code or regulations, or
the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or the effect resulting from, the
facts and circumstances described herein that is not specifically covered by the ruling
set forth above.
PLR-118554-20 4
Procedural Statements
The ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their returns that provides the date on and control number of
the letter ruling.
Pursuant to a Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent
to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Mark J. Weiss_________________
Mark J. Weiss
Chief, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.