Written designation controls voluntary payroll tax payment

Number
202129007
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Income Tax Collected at Source
Code sections
§ 3402
Ruling dated
October 31, 2019
Publicly released
July 23, 2021

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel explained when a taxpayer may direct how a payroll tax payment is applied. A taxpayer may designate a voluntary payment only through specific written instructions made when the payment is submitted. The taxpayer cannot designate a payment produced by enforced collection. If a voluntary partial payment lacks proper instructions, the IRS applies it in the government's best interests, generally to successive periods by priority and to non-trust-fund taxes first. Excess amounts then pay trust-fund taxes, followed by assessed fees and collection costs, assessed penalties and interest, and accrued penalties and interest.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a taxpayer designate how a quarterly federal tax deposit attributable to a specific payroll is applied?
  • Outcome: Advice given: yes for a voluntary payment with specific contemporaneous written instructions; otherwise the IRS applies the payment in its best interests.
  • Key authorities: Rev. Proc. 2002-26; Policy Statement 5-14; IRM §§ 1.2.1.6.3, 5.7.4.3, and 8.25.2.4.4; Salazar v. Commissioner

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2019110508593544
UILC: 3402.00-00

Number: 202129007
Release Date: 7/23/2021
From: ----------------------
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:46 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: ----------------------------
Subject: Designating Payments/ROTA call

Hi --------

During our ROTA call earlier this month, a question was raised about whether a taxpayer can designate the payment allocation when the taxpayer makes a quarterly federal tax deposit, attributable to a specific payroll, or whether the payment must be applied in the best interests of the government. Please share the response below with your staff.

A taxpayer is permitted to designate a voluntary payment, but in order for such designation to be proper the request or designation for the application of the payment must be specific, in writing, and made at the time of the payment. A taxpayer has no right of designation of payments resulting from enforced collection measures.

If a taxpayer submits a voluntary partial payment when there are assessments for more than one taxable period, and does not provide specific written instructions as to the application of the partial payment, then the payments will be applied in a manner serving the best interests of the government. The payment will generally be applied to satisfy the liability for successive periods in descending order of priority until the payment is absorbed and is applied to non-trust fund taxes first.

Pursuant to Policy Statement 5-14 (found at IRM 1.2.1.6.3), to the extent partial payments exceed the nontrust fund portion of the tax liability, they are deemed to be applied against the trust fund portion of the tax liability (e.g., withheld income tax, employee’s share of FICA, collected excise taxes). Once the nontrust fund and trust fund taxes are paid, the remaining payments will be considered to be applied to assessed fees and collection costs, assessed penalty and interest, and accrued penalty and interest to the date of payment.

For more information, see the following resources:

Rev. Proc. 2002-26, 2002-1 C.B. 746

2

Salazar v. Comm'r, 338 Fed. Appx. 75, 79 (2d Cir. 2009) (and cases quoted therein) IRM 5.7.4.3 IRM 8.25.2.4.4

Thanks ---

---------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace