Chief Counsel Advice 202125015 Released June 25, 2021 Advice

Refund extension could not be signed after the suit deadline

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS issued a claim-disallowance notice that started the two-year period for filing a refund suit. Although Section 6532(a)(2) permits the parties to extend that period using Form 907, the extension had to be executed before the original two-year period expired. Once the deadline passed without a timely suit or extension, Section 6514(a)(2) prohibited the IRS from issuing the refund. The IRS therefore advised that no relief was available.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer obtain a refund or execute a Form 907 extension after the refund-suit period had expired?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no relief was available.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6514(a)(2) and 6532(a)(2)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2020031318393440
UILC: 6532.02-04, 6514.00-00

Number: 202125015
Release Date: 6/25/2021
From:
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 6:39:34 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: SBSE Counsel advice in #6500871

Hi ------. Thanks for your patience. I’ve now taken a closer look at this and agree with the SBSE
Counsel opinion. In addition, here are a few other key points:

1) The 105C was issued on April 12, 2017. That means the two-year period for filing suit expired on
April 12, 2019. Yes, under IRC § 6532(a)(2) the two-year period can be extended by using Form
907, but the time for executing such extension has expired; the extension would have had to
have been executed before the two-year period had expired. Take a look at this AOD and the
case for which it was issued. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-aod/aod200404.pdf

2) Once the IRS issues a notice of claim disallowance, the IRS is prohibited from issuing a refund
after the 2-year period for filing suit has expired unless the taxpayer has protected herself by
filing a timely refund suit. See IRC § 6514(a)(2).

Unfortunately I do not see any relief that can be given for this taxpayer’s ------- refund.
Let me know if you have any further questions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.