Refund extension could not be signed after the suit deadline

Number
202125015
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Credits or Refunds After Period of Limitation (Erroneous v. Not Erroneous); Extension of Time
Code sections
§ 6514, § 6532
Ruling dated
March 13, 2020
Publicly released
June 25, 2021

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS issued a claim-disallowance notice that started the two-year period for filing a refund suit. Although Section 6532(a)(2) permits the parties to extend that period using Form 907, the extension had to be executed before the original two-year period expired. Once the deadline passed without a timely suit or extension, Section 6514(a)(2) prohibited the IRS from issuing the refund. The IRS therefore advised that no relief was available.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer obtain a refund or execute a Form 907 extension after the refund-suit period had expired?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no relief was available.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6514(a)(2) and 6532(a)(2)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2020031318393440
UILC: 6532.02-04, 6514.00-00

Number: 202125015
Release Date: 6/25/2021
From:
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 6:39:34 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: SBSE Counsel advice in #6500871

Hi ------. Thanks for your patience. I’ve now taken a closer look at this and agree with the SBSE Counsel opinion. In addition, here are a few other key points:

1) The 105C was issued on April 12, 2017. That means the two-year period for filing suit expired on April 12, 2019. Yes, under IRC § 6532(a)(2) the two-year period can be extended by using Form 907, but the time for executing such extension has expired; the extension would have had to have been executed before the two-year period had expired. Take a look at this AOD and the case for which it was issued. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-aod/aod200404.pdf

2) Once the IRS issues a notice of claim disallowance, the IRS is prohibited from issuing a refund after the 2-year period for filing suit has expired unless the taxpayer has protected herself by filing a timely refund suit. See IRC § 6514(a)(2).

Unfortunately I do not see any relief that can be given for this taxpayer’s ------- refund. Let me know if you have any further questions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace