Title 18 plea restitution was not a Westbrooks case
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The defendant pleaded guilty to two Title 18 counts, and the plea agreement authorized restitution in the exact amount the court ordered. The IRS advised that the restitution therefore did not fall under the Westbrooks rule for restitution imposed only as a supervised-release condition.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the court-ordered restitution fall under the Westbrooks limitation?
- Outcome: Advice given: no, the plea agreement supported the ordered restitution.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6201(a)(4); Title 18 restitution; Westbrooks restitution analysis
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2020022416235144
UILC: 6201.01-06
Number: 202125012
Release Date: 6/25/2021
From:
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 4:23:51 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: potential Westbrooks
This is not a Westbrooks case. The defendant pleaded guilty to two Title 18 counts and
there’s a plea agreement providing for restitution in the amount ordered. Please call if
you have any further questions on this matter.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.