Title 18 plea restitution was not a Westbrooks case
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The defendant pleaded guilty to two Title 18 counts, and the plea agreement authorized restitution in the exact amount the court ordered. The IRS advised that the restitution therefore did not fall under the Westbrooks rule for restitution imposed only as a supervised-release condition.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the court-ordered restitution fall under the Westbrooks limitation?
- Outcome: Advice given: no, the plea agreement supported the ordered restitution.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6201(a)(4); Title 18 restitution; Westbrooks restitution analysis
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2020022416235144
UILC: 6201.01-06
Number: 202125012
Release Date: 6/25/2021
From:
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 4:23:51 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: potential Westbrooks
This is not a Westbrooks case. The defendant pleaded guilty to two Title 18 counts and
there’s a plea agreement providing for restitution in the amount ordered. Please call if
you have any further questions on this matter.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace