Tax matters partner authority does not extend to a Section 6707A penalty

Number
202121011
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Tax Treatment Determined At Partnership Level; Partnership Item
Code sections
§ 6221, § 6231, § 6707A
Ruling dated
August 19, 2020
Publicly released
May 28, 2021

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An IRS email addressed who may sign a limitations extension involving a Section 6707A penalty. The response stated that a tax matters partner signs only TEFRA statute extensions. A Section 6707A penalty would not fall under TEFRA, so tax matters partner status would not supply signing authority for that extension. The adviser added that a tax matters partner must be a general partner, so the same individual might have authority in another capacity.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a tax matters partner's authority to sign TEFRA statute extensions cover a Section 6707A penalty?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no, although the same person might separately be a general partner.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6707A; TEFRA partnership procedures

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2020081908321943
UILC: 6221.00-00, 6231.03-00

Number: 202121011
Release Date: 5/28/2021
From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 8:32:19 AM
To: ----------------------
Cc: -------------------------------------------------------------------
Bcc:
Subject: RE: -------F872 for 6707A Penalty

Hi --------

The TMP only signs TEFRA statute extensions. The section 6707A penalty wouldn’t be
under TEFRA. I note that a TMP must be a general partner so it could be the same
person anyways.

Happy to discuss.

Thanks --
-------

----------------
---------------------
--------------
-------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace